View clinical trials related to Coronary Stenosis.
Filter by:This is a prospective interventional study to assess the effect of cilostazol compared with aspirin in Korean T2DM patients with atherosclerosis.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential benefit of systematic preoperative coronary angiography followed by selective coronary artery revascularization on the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) and undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
Prospective, multi-center, randomized 1:1, single blind trial using BuMA Supreme versus Resolute Integrity conducted in approximately 14 interventional cardiology centers in The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Portugal. Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 9 and 12 months post-stent implantation. All patients will undergo repeat angiography at 9 months follow-up. QCA assessment will be performed at baseline (pre- and post-procedure) and at 9 months follow-up.
The ABSORB III PK sub-study is a prospective, open-label, non-blinded study enrolling approximately 12 subjects in up to 5 US sites. ABSORB III PK sub-study is a part of ABSORB III RCT (NCT01751906). The objective is to determine the pharmacokinetics of everolimus delivered by the Absorb BVS in a separate and non-randomized cohort of subjects who only receive Absorb BVS with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesions after implantation of the Absorb BVS. Note: The ABSORB III PK subjects will not contribute to the determination of the ABSORB III RCT primary endpoint.
ABSORB IV is a prospective, randomized (1:1, Absorb BVS to XIENCE), single-blind, multi-center study, registering approximately 2610 subjects from approximately 140 sites in the United States and outside the United States. ABSORB IV is a continuation of ABSORB III (NCT01751906) trial which are maintained under one protocol because both trial designs are related. The data from ABSORB III and ABSORB IV will be pooled to support the ABSORB IV primary endpoint. Both the trials will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Absorb BVS. The ABSORB IV Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is designed to continue to evaluate the safety and effectiveness as well as the potential short and long-term benefits of Abbott Vascular Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) System, and the Absorb GT1™ BVS System (once commercially available), as compared to the commercially approved, control stent XIENCE.
We aimed to evaluate feasibility and the 6-month angiographic and OCT results of FFR - guided use of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (Sequent Please™, B Braun) with provisional bare metal stenting for elective PCI of de novo coronary lesions.
The German-Austrian ABSORB Register shall provide an analysis of acute and long-term safety as well as therapy outcomes of the ABSORB (trade mark) bioresorbable vascular scaffold system in patients suffering from coronary artery disease.
The NIREUS study aims to demonstrate angiographic non-inferiority for the BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (hereafter referred to as BioNIR) in comparison to the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (hereafter referred to as Resolute). The trial hypothesis is that the BioNIR is non-inferior to the Resolute for the primary endpoint of angiographic in-stent late loss at 6 months.
The BioNIR study aims to show that the BioNIR ridaforolimus eluting stent is non-inferior to the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent for the primary clinical endpoint of target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months; that it is non-inferior to the Resolute for the secondary endpoint of angiographic in-stent late loss at 13 months; and that it is more cost-effective.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Absorb BVS System compared to the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (EECSS) in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in separate epicardial vessels.