Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
Official title:
Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Derived Quantitative Functional Assessment Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance: The FAIR Study
Coronary angiography-derived FFR assessment (AngioQFA) is a novel technique for physiological lesion assessment based on 3-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and virtual hyperemic flow derived from contrast frame count without drug-induced hyperemia. The goal of this prospective, multicenter trial is to compare the diagnostic performance of AngioQFA with invasive FFR as the reference standard. The secondary purpose is to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) using wire-based IMR as the reference standard.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 330 |
Est. completion date | October 30, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | October 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria - General Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age =18 years. 2. Coronary angiography is required for patients with suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease. 3. The subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent. - Angiographic Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diameter stenosis of 30%-90% by visual estimate 2. Reference vessel size =2 mm in stenotic segment by visual estimate Exclusion Criteria: Patients meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded: - General Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subject has undergone CABG of the target vessel. 2. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction within one week prior to the intended procedure. 3. Severe heart failure (NYHA=III) 4. Patients with other serious conditions not eligible for clinical trials, such as severe arrhythmia or tachycardia, sinus syndrome, asthma, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 5. Serum creatinine level of >150µmol / L. 6. Subject has known allergy to iodinated contrast agents, adenosine, or ATP. 7. Pregnant or breastfeeding. 8. Repeated enrollment. 9. Any other factors that the researchers consider not suitable for diagnostic intervention or FFR and IMR detection, such as the target vessel has collateral circulation, coronary spasm, the target vessel plaque rupture resulting in myocardial infarction, or other reasons deemed unsuitable for inclusion. - Angiographic Exclusion Criteria: 1. Myocardial bridge or coronary artery fistula on the study lesions. 2. The target lesion =50% diameter stenosis in the left main coronary artery or ostial lesions less than 3 mm to the RCA. 3. Low-quality angiography with poor contrast agent filling or inability to detect vascular boundaries due to various reasons, vascular overlap or severe distortion of the target vessel to fully expose the lesion location is not expected to be calculated. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Shenzhen Raysight Intelligent Medical Technology Co., Ltd. | Jieyang People's Hospital, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Diagnostic sensitivity of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia on a per-patient basis. | Positive FFR is defined as FFR=0.80. Positive AngioQFA is defined as AngioQFA=0.80. | 1 hour | |
Primary | Diagnostic sensitivity of AngioIMR versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-patient basis. | Positive IMR is defined as IMR=25. Positive AngioIMR is defined as AngioIMR=25. | 1 hour | |
Primary | Diagnostic specificity of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia on a per-patient basis. | Negative FFR is defined as FFR>0.80. Negative AngioQFA is defined as AngioQFA>0.80. | 1 hour | |
Primary | Diagnostic specificity of AngioIMR versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-patient basis. | Negative IMR is defined as IMR<25. Negative AngioIMR is defined as AngioIMR<25. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia on a per-patient basis. | Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia on a per-patient basis. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | Diagnostic performance of AngioQFA in comparison to FFR on a per-vessel basis. | Diagnostic performance includes sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | AUC and ROC of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis. | AUC and ROC of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | The consistency of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis. | The consistency of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AngioIMR versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-patient basis. | Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AngioIMR versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-patient basis. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | Diagnostic performance of AngioIMR in comparison to IMR on a per-vessel basis. | Diagnostic performance includes sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | AUC and ROC of AngioIMR Versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis. | AUC and ROC of AngioIMR Versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | The consistency of AngioIMR Versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis. | The consistency of AngioIMR Versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis. | 1 hour | |
Secondary | Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of AngioQFA and QCA DS% versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia. | FFR=0.80 is defined as "positive", FFR>0.80 is defined as "negative"; DS%=50% is defined as "positive", DS%<50% is defined as "negative". | 1 hour | |
Secondary | Diagnostic accuracy of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia after PCI. | Postoperative FFR=0.89 was defined as "positive", FFR>0.89 is defined as "negative". | 1 hour | |
Secondary | The Pearson correlation coefficient and consistency of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis after PCI. | The Pearson correlation coefficient and consistency of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis after PCI. | 1 hour |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |