Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04777513
Other study ID # HEMOFLOW PMS_2020
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date August 6, 2020
Est. completion date May 31, 2023

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Hemolens Diagnostics Sp. z o.o.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

A multicentre, post-marketing, observational trial in 450 patients, whose standard diagnostic workup for chronic coronary syndromes provided for Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA). Medical records of a potential subject of the trial before their enrolment contain a good quality result of at least 128-slice CCTA performed up to 3 months before the elective ICA. CCTA should find at least one ≥50% stenosis in at least one big coronary artery of ≥ 2 mm diameter. At one hour before ICA in the latest the patient should have a resting Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (CNBP) taken with a certified device delivered by LifeFlow. The last criterion before including a patient in the final analysis is at least one significant (≥50%) stenosis in one or two coronary arteries of ≥ 2 mm diameter visually confirmed by ICA with a FFR measurement taken in these arteries. The data collection period will cover time from admission for the elective ICA to discharge from the hospital (evaluation of possible adverse events related to invasive procedures). After initial qualification of available data by the attending physician, selected patients will be asked for a consent to participation in the trial no later than upon admission for the elective ICA and before CNBP measurement.


Description:

Stage 1 After a patient declares their consent, a doctor or another member of the study team trained by the sponsor will perform procedures in the following order: - Define the unique patient ID to be recorded in the CRF with the patient's demographic data - Assess the quality of CCTA imaging data (DICOM) according to guidelines agreed upon with the sponsor and record the number and location of the significant (≥50%) stenosis sites in the CRF based on CCTA - No later than one hour before ICA starts, perform a physical examination consisting in instantaneous peripheral blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) resting measurement performed with a standard sphygmomanometer and Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure measurement (1-3 min). Stage 2 After the procedures mentioned above are performed, the patient will undergo elective ICA with the outcomes, i.e.: - video material showing the location of the wire during the FFR measurement, - digital pressure signals exported from the FFR measuring device used to determine the value of the invasive FFR, - values of FFR measurements obtained during ICA will be entered after being anonymised in a dedicated HEMOFLOW PMS_2020 reference database. Stage 3 Within 48 hours of ICA completion a doctor or another member of the study team trained by the sponsor: - will enter the following data in the Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro system: 1. Patient's data, i.e. patient's ID, gender, height, body mass, exercise tolerability, information on used medications and smoking cigarettes. Optionally, i.e. if upon admission for ICA a blood test was performed as a part of the standard diagnostic workup - haematocrit levels and total protein concentration 2. Files containing CCTA imaging data in the DICOM format. 3. Values of instantaneous peripheral blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) resting measurement performed with a standard sphygmomanometer as well as the digital signal obtained during the CNBP measurement (1-3 min) - Based on the CCTA description or meta data contained in the imaging data the doctor or another member of the study team will record the following information in the CRF: 1. Radiation dose during CCTA 2. Contrast medium dose during CCTA - Will enter the following information in the CRF: 1. Radiation dose during the diagnostic part of ICA 2. Contrast medium dose during the diagnostic part of ICA 3. Number and type of adverse events 4. Duration of the diagnostic workup. Stage 4 Within 7 days of entering all the stage 3 data the investigator (a cardiologist) trained by the sponsor will measure the value of the virtual FFR with the Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro system at locations corresponding to ICA FFR measurements (based on video recording entered in the database during stage 2) Based on results obtained from the Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro system vs reference data an analysis will be performed on meeting the primary and secondary end points of the trial.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 450
Est. completion date May 31, 2023
Est. primary completion date September 30, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age = 18 2. Declaration of informed consent to sharing medical records gathered during the standard diagnostic workup 3. History of chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) 4. Diagnostic CCTA (good quality test allowing investigation of the entire coronary artery tree), showing at least one site with stenosis =50% of the lumen in a large coronary artery of = 2 mm diameter, with no prior revascularisation 5. Standard treatment of chronic coronary syndromes with no dosage modification required within at least 4 weeks before the enrolment 6. Patients with a prior acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or revascularisation would be found eligible under the following conditions: - Over 30 days from the acute coronary syndrome occurrence - FFR assessment during ICA may only cover the vessels that were not revascularized (both PCI and CABG) and were not the reason of ACS - No closed coronary arteries Exclusion Criteria: 1. CCTA-confirmed myocardial bridges causing >50% stenosis of the epicardial vascular lumen 2. Coronary obstruction confirmed by CCTA or invasive coronarography 3. History of ACS with coronary angioplasty or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) performed unless point 6 conditions are met 4. Significant haemodynamic abnormalities of the valve or history of surgical correction of the defect or CABG 5. Second-degree or third-degree atrioventricular block, sinus node dysfunction, QTc > 450 ms or prolonged QTc 6. LVEF = 35% found in an echocardiogram performed within the last 6 months 7. BMI = 35 8. Clinically apparent infection 9. Thrombocytopenia below 100.000/mm3 10. Active neoplastic disease (apart from basal cell carcinoma and carcinoma in situ) and other conditions, which, in the investigator's opinion significantly affect their life expectancy 11. Other significant conditions, infections, addictions and psychological or social factors, which, in the doctor's opinion, may affect patient's ability to participate in the trial or significantly affect their safety

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
CCTA (Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography)
Per the protocol, patients had a coronary computed tomography angiography within standard of care before the enrollment to the study.
ICA (Invasive Coronary Angiography)
Per the protocol, patients will have an Invasive Coronary Angiography within standard of care.
FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)
Per the protocol, patients will have a Fractional Flow Reserve procedure within standard of care.
Device:
CNBP measurement
Per the protocol, patients will have the measurement of the resting Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (CNBP). The signal is required for iSIL-FFR technology.
Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro
Per the protocol, non-invasive FFR measurements will be perfomed via Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro technology for the enrolled patients.

Locations

Country Name City State
Poland American Heart of Poland, Centrum Kardiologii i Kardiochirurgii w Bielsku-Bialej Bielsko-Biala
Poland Oddzial Kliniczny Kardiologii oraz Interwencji Sercowo-Naczyniowych Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie Cracovia
Poland The John Paul II Specialist Hospital in Cracovia Cracovia
Poland The University Clinical Centre Gdansk
Poland The Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University Katowice
Poland "Miedziowe Centrum Zdrowia" S.A. Lubin
Poland American Heart of Poland, Centrum Sercowo - Naczyniowe w Ustroniu Ustron
Poland The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski National Institute of Cardiology Warsaw
Poland The 4th Military Teaching Hospital Wroclaw
Poland The Jan Mikulicz-Radecki University Teaching Hospital Wroclaw
Poland The T. Marciniak Lower Silesian Specialist Hospital - Center of Emergency Medicine Wroclaw

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hemolens Diagnostics Sp. z o.o. GENELYTICA Sp. z o.o.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Poland, 

References & Publications (17)

Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available. — View Citation

De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003 Apr 15;107(14):1877-83. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000061950.24940.88. Epub 2003 Mar 31. — View Citation

De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov;367(18):1768. Mobius-Winckler, Sven [corrected to Mobius-Winkler, Sven]. — View Citation

DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45. — View Citation

Kruk M, Wardziak L, Demkow M, Pleban W, Pregowski J, Dzielinska Z, Witulski M, Witkowski A, Ruzyllo W, Kepka C. Workstation-Based Calculation of CTA-Based FFR for Intermediate Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;9(6):690-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.019. Epub 2016 Feb 17. — View Citation

Leone AM, Martin-Reyes R, Baptista SB, Amabile N, Raposo L, Franco Pelaez JA, Trani C, Cialdella P, Basile E, Zimbardo G, Burzotta F, Porto I, Aurigemma C, Rebuzzi AG, Faustino M, Niccoli G, Abreu PF, Slama MS, Spagnoli V, Telleria Arrieta M, Amat Santos IJ, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Lopez Palop R, Crea F. The Multi-center Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Contrast MEdium INduced Pd/Pa RaTiO in Predicting FFR (MEMENTO-FFR) Study. EuroIntervention. 2016 Aug 20;12(6):708-15. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A115. — View Citation

Lindstaedt M, Fritz MK, Yazar A, Perrey C, Germing A, Grewe PH, Laczkovics AM, Mugge A, Bojara W. Optimizing revascularization strategies in patients with multivessel coronary disease: impact of intracoronary pressure measurements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Apr;129(4):897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.036. — View Citation

Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P, Budoff MJ, Cole JH, Jaffer FA, Leon MB, Malpeso J, Mancini GB, Park SJ, Schwartz RS, Shaw LJ, Mauri L. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1237-45. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11274. — View Citation

Morris PD, van de Vosse FN, Lawford PV, Hose DR, Gunn JP. "Virtual" (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve: Current Challenges and Limitations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1009-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Jun 24. — View Citation

Nakazato R, Park HB, Berman DS, Gransar H, Koo BK, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Budoff MJ, Malpeso J, Leipsic J, Min JK. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the DeFACTO study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Nov;6(6):881-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000297. Epub 2013 Sep 30. — View Citation

Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, Albus C, Benlian P, Boysen G, Cifkova R, Deaton C, Ebrahim S, Fisher M, Germano G, Hobbs R, Hoes A, Karadeniz S, Mezzani A, Prescott E, Ryden L, Scherer M, Syvanne M, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Vrints C, Wood D, Zamorano JL, Zannad F; European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR); ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(13):1635-701. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092. Epub 2012 May 3. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2012 Sep;33(17):2126. — View Citation

Reczuch K, Jankowska E, Telichowski A, Porada A, Banasiak W, Ponikowski P. Measurement of fractional flow reserve in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease and borderline lesions prevents unnecessary revascularisation procedures. Kardiol Pol. 2004 Apr;60(4):311-19; discussion 320-1. English, Polish. — View Citation

Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611. — View Citation

Toth G, De Bruyne B, Casselman F, De Vroey F, Pyxaras S, Di Serafino L, Van Praet F, Van Mieghem C, Stockman B, Wijns W, Degrieck I, Barbato E. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2013 Sep 24;128(13):1405-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002740. Epub 2013 Aug 28. — View Citation

Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Uva MS, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A; Grupa Robocza Europejskiego Towarzystwa Kardiologicznego (ESC); Europejskie Stowarzyszenie Chirurgii Serca i Klatki Piersiowej (EACTS) do spraw rewaskularyzacji miesnia sercowego; European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). [2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization]. Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(12):1253-379. doi: 10.5603/KP.2014.0224. No abstract available. Polish. — View Citation

Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V, Satran A, Chandra M, Masden R, Leesar MA. Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Oct 1;96(7):877-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.040. — View Citation

Wu W, Pan DR, Foin N, Pang S, Ye P, Holm N, Ren XM, Luo J, Nanjundappa A, Chen SL. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 5;6:29409. doi: 10.1038/srep29409. — View Citation

* Note: There are 17 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The evaluation of the increased diagnostic accuracy of the non-invasive Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro technology Evaluation of the increased diagnostic accuracy (area under ROC curve, AUC) in detection of haemodynamically significant stenoses in coronary arteries with a non-invasive Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro technology compared to CCTA in reference to the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) testing at the arterial level. Up to 18 months
Secondary The evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of the non-invasive Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro technology Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro in detection of haemodynamically significant stenoses in coronary arteries (FFR value =0.80) compared to CCTA (stenosis = 50%), in reference to the invasive FFR testing at the patient and arterial level, based on parameters like sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value, accuracy at the patient and arterial level. Up to 18 months
Secondary The evaluation of safety of the non-invasive Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro technology Evaluation of safety of the non-invasive Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro technology (the result of the non-invasive test completes the diagnostic workup for coronary disease) compared to the standard diagnostics in chronic coronary syndromes based on the following parameters:
Radiation dose during the diagnostic workup
Contrast medium dose in the diagnostic workup
Adverse events during the diagnostic workup
Duration of the diagnostic workup
Up to 5 days. The date from admission for the scheduled ICA to discharge from the hospital.
Secondary The evaluation of the costs of Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro technology 3) Evaluation of the costs of Cardiolens FFR-CT Pro in diagnostics of chronic coronary syndromes compared to the standard diagnostic workup (the sum of the costs for individual diagnostic modalities according to the National Health Fund reimbursement prices as well as Procedural Reimbursement Payment Guide) Up to 5 days. The date from admission for the scheduled ICA to discharge from the hospital.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A