Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT00475488 |
Other study ID # |
H2006/02690 |
Secondary ID |
V1111-1166-3083 |
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 1996 |
Est. completion date |
December 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2022 |
Source |
Austin Health |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)Surgery is commonly used to treat patients with coronary
artery disease (atherosclerosis) for the relief of angina (chest pain) and improve heart
muscle function.
Healthy veins or arteries, referred to as 'conduits' from elsewhere in the patient's body,
are grafted (attached) from the aorta to the coronary arteries, bypassing (via new routes)
coronary artery narrowings caused by atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries) and thereby
improving the blood supply to the myocardium (heart muscle).
Over the years, a range of different veins and arteries from around the body have been used
to bypass diseased coronary arteries. Typically, internal thoracic arteries from behind the
breastbone and the saphenous veins from the legs are used for bypass. More recently, radial
arteries from the forearm have also been used to bypass coronary arteries that are diseased
(atherosclerotic). There is strong evidence to indicate that the left internal thoracic
artery stays open the longest (i.e. has the highest patency) and achieves the best health
outcomes. As a result, most cardiac surgeons use the left internal thoracic artery as their
first choice of conduit (vessel used to bypass the blocked artery). However, many patients
require multiple grafts and there is little evidence as to which grafts are the best conduits
to use.
It has been suggested that the radial arteries might function better than saphenous veins as
conduits. The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes Trial(RAPCO) aims to compare
patency of the radial arteries with the right internal thoracic artery and also with the
saphenous vein.
Description:
The Department of Cardiac Surgery at Austin Health is conducting a prospective randomised
trial, stratified into two separate sub-studies. The first compares the radial artery with
the right internal thoracic artery(as a free aorto-coronary graft) and the second comparies
the radial artery with a saphenous vein graft. Each patient was to be followed for 10 years
after their CABG surgery in order to assess both the pattern of graft survival over 10 years
and also to record major clinical events.
The study was first given approval by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee on
August 18th,1995. Enrolment commenced in June 1996. Recruitment ceased in March 2005.
Patients were randomly assigned to the control or experimental group, patients in both groups
received the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior decending(LAD) and the study
graft as the second graft.
The gold standard measure for the comparison of conduits is through the use of post-operative
angiograms. These angiograms assess how patent (open) the grafts are, and also offer quality
assurance of the CABG surgery performed. To spread the graft patency end-points over the 10
years after CABG, patients undergo a second randomisation as to the time at which their graft
patency is to be assessed. The timing of the graft study coronary angiogram is weighted
towards the end of the 10 year period with the aim of having 10% at 1 year, 20% at 2 years,
20% at 5 years, 30% at 7.5 years and 30% at 10 years after CABG surgery. Clinical data is
systematically collected to determine those patients who experience heart attack, repeat
surgery, balloon angioplasty or death over subsequent years.
To enrich the number of mid-study graft patency end-points a protocol amendment(July 19th,
2002) was approved allowing patients to be offered a selective coronary angiogram at the 5
year anniversary of their surgery.
A further protocol amendment(November 16th, 2006) allowed coronary and graft CT angiography
to be used optionally to replace selective angiography and also to offer all patients imaging
at 10 years, in addition to the original pre-specified, randomised time of imaging.
As per the ethics approval and prior protocol amendments, lifelong followup is conducted on
patients enrolled in the trial. As such, a RAPCO-Extension trial will be conducted,
evaluating clinical outcomes at 15-years follow-up.