Clinical Trials Logo

Colorectal Polyps clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Colorectal Polyps.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT03699163 Active, not recruiting - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

The Colorectal Breath Analysis (COBRA) Study

COBRA
Start date: June 3, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study aims to determine whether a breath test could be used for early detection of colorectal cancer and colorectal polyps. Patients who are attending for a planned colonoscopy or who are scheduled to undergo elective resection of histologically confirmed colorectal cancer (adenocarcinoma) will be approached to provide a breath sample. Multi platform mass spectrometry analysis will be performed to establish volatile biomarkers that can discriminate between colorectal cancer, benign colorectal disease (e.g. polyps) and healthy controls.

NCT ID: NCT02887573 Active, not recruiting - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

Free-residue Nutrients for the Bowel Preparation of Colon Capsule Endoscopy

Start date: January 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Colon capsule endoscopy(CCE) is a new diagnostic method of colonic lesions.It has advantages of no requirement for sedation and air insufflation.The bowel preparation has a closely relationship with yield of diagnosing diseases.Bowel preparation of CCE is not only to clean the colon but also to promote capsule propulsion.Now there is not an optimal method for CCE.

NCT ID: NCT02041507 Active, not recruiting - Pain Clinical Trials

Water-aided Colonoscopy vs Air Insufflation Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening

Start date: February 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The degree of protection afforded by colonoscopy against proximal colorectal cancer (CRC) appears to be related to the quality of the procedure, and the incomplete removal of lesions has been shown to increase the subsequent risk of developing a colon cancer. Some studies suggest that small polyps with advanced histology are more common in the right than in the left colon (right colon proximal to splenic flexure, left colon distal to the splenic flexure). The average size of polyps in the right colon with advanced pathology or containing adenocarcinoma was ≤9 mm, whereas in the left colon their average size was >9 mm, P<0.001. Inadequate prevention of right-sided CRC incidence and mortality may be due to right-sided polyps with advanced histology or that harbor malignancy. These presumptive precursors of cancer are smaller and possibly more easily obscured by residual feces, and more likely to be missed at colonoscopy. Water-aided colonoscopy (WAC) can be subdivided broadly into two major categories: water immersion (WI), characterized by suction removal of the infused water predominantly during the withdrawal phase of colonoscopy, and water exchange (WE), characterized by suction removal of infused water predominantly during the insertion phase of colonoscopy. In some reports WE appeared to be superior to both WI and air insufflation colonoscopy (AI) in terms of pain reduction and adenoma detection, particularly for <10 mm adenomas in the proximal colon. In this multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) we test the hypothesis that that WE, compared to AI and WI, will enhance overall Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in CRC screening patients. Confirmation of the primary hypothesis will provide evidence that WE enhances the quality of screening colonoscopy. We also hypothesize that WE may be more effective in detecting proximal colon adenomas than WI and AI, particularly <10 mm adenomas, thus increasing proximal colon ADR and proximal colon ADR <10 mm. Confirmation of secondary hypotheses will provide justification for further testing that WE may provide a strategy to improve prevention of colorectal cancer by increasing detection of adenomas in screening colonoscopy. Unlike previous reports of single colonoscopist studies, the insertion and withdrawal phases of colonoscopy will be done by different investigators. The second investigator will be blinded to the method used to insert the instrument, thus eliminating possible bias about procedure related issues. Several secondary outcomes will also be analysed.