Clinical Trials Logo

Colorectal Polyps clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Colorectal Polyps.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1 ·  Next »

NCT ID: NCT04727918 Completed - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

Comparison of Cold Biopsy Forceps vs Cold Snare for Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Removal

BIOPANS
Start date: October 5, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

European guidelines recommend the use of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCP)(5 mm or less). However, for DCP < 4 mm cold biopsy forceps (CBF) may be optional. Moreover, CBF remains the endoscopist's technique of choice for polyp resection and CSP is associated with a failure of specimen retrieval for histology in up to 6.8% of cases. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the efficacy of CSP with CBF for removal of DCP in routine colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT02595775 Completed - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

A Trial of an Audit and Feedback Report to Improve Colonoscopy Performance

Start date: September 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This project aims to measure the impact of a physician report card (also called an audit & feedback report) on colonoscopy performance. Endoscopists in Ontario will be randomly assigned to either receive the endoscopist report card or to no feedback. Using Ontario health administrative data, the quality of colonoscopy will be compared between those who received the report card and those who do not. The investigators will also measure the effect of receiving endoscopist report card on colonoscopy performance amongst endoscopists who perform poorly at baseline compared to those who do not. Further, the acceptability of two educational interventions that aim to improve the quality of colonoscopy will be evaluated by conducting one-on-one interviews with select participants. This study is critical to ensure that Canadians have access to the highest quality colonoscopy possible.

NCT ID: NCT02354287 Completed - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Cold Biopsy Forceps With Pre-lift for Complete Resection of Colonic Polyps ≤7mm in Size

Start date: February 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

There is no consensus method for removal of diminutive (5mm) to small(6-9mm) colorectal polyps at colonoscopy. Neither the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy or the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have guidelines for the removal of these polyps, despite the fact that around 90% of lesions removed by polypectomy at colonoscopy are diminutive to small. Multiple techniques are used for polyp removal, especially diminutive lesions. These include either forceps, both hot and cold, as well as snare with electrocautery or cold snare. Forceps utilises shearing force to grasp tissue and remove it, with the hot method passing a current through the grasper to essentially burn tissue. Snare is the use of a small metal loop placed and tightened at the base of polyps to cut through the tissue either straight away in a cold method or with electrocautery where a small current is passed through the loop to assist cutting through tissue. Surveys of Colonoscopists and Gastroenterologists in Australia and the United States show that the choice of method used for diminutive to small polyps is highly variable with cold snaring marginally favoured.Studies into polypectomy techniques are limited and it is clear that additional data and the review of polypectomy methods needs to be undertaken in order determine the optimal method for the removal of diminutive and small colorectal polyps. A technique is used at the Gloucestershire National Health Service (NHS) trust involving a submucosal pre injection with a standard solution then the use of cold forceps for removal of polyps ≤7mm. This appears to be both very safe and highly effective method for the removal of these lesions compared to other techniques. No formal published studies have been completed to evaluate this method at national and international levels. We propose a study to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and costs of this method.

NCT ID: NCT02331836 Completed - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

Endocuff-assisted Versus Cap-assisted Versus Standard Colonoscopy

EC-Cap-SC
Start date: February 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Comparison of Endocuff-assisted, Cap-assisted and Standard colonoscopy for assessment of the adenoma detection rate (ADR)

NCT ID: NCT02284802 Completed - Clinical trials for Head and Neck Neoplasms

Early Detection of Tumors of the Digestive Tract by Confocal Endomicroscopy

Start date: September 10, 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Confocal endomicroscopy is an emerging technique that allows in vivo imaging of cells and tissue structures of the gastrointestinal mucosa, with a magnification of about 1000 times, guiding optical biopsies in real time. Confocal endomicroscopy represents technique that combines conventional white light image with the confocal microscope probe, thereby allowing examination of the surface epithelium in vivo and histological diagnosis during endoscopy. Among the applications already established for its use, stand out diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus, gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, celiac disease, differentiation of hyperplastic adenomatous polyps of the colon, microscopic colitis and follow-up of patients with inflammatory disease, reducing the need for endoscopic biopsies. The CLE can still detect molecular changes effectively improving the endoscopic diagnosis. This pilot project consists of 07 subprojects which the technology of confocal endomicroscopia will be evaluated and compared with the histological results of biopsy or surgical specimens: 1. confocal endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia and superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus 2 Diagnosis of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with head and neck cancer by confocal endomicroscopy 3 Detect the presence of premalignant lesions in the gastric stump in patients with reflux alkaline gastritis after partial gastrectomy 4. detect lesions in the gastric mucosa of patients with familial history of gastric cancer 5 Biliary Strictures: differential diagnosis by confocal endomicroscopia 6 confocal Endomicroscopy of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas 7 Contribution of confocal endomicroscopy for the differential diagnosis of colorectal polyps The project aims to deploy the structure of the Confocal endomicroscopy Endoscopy ICESP, for performing in vivo histological examinations of the digestive tract, biliary tract and pancreas. All research groups involved in the early detection of tumors of the esophagus, stomach, biliary tract, pancreas, colon and rectum may benefit from the implementation of this methodology.

NCT ID: NCT02217449 Completed - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

Virtual Chromoendoscopy for Distal Polyps

Start date: January 2011
Phase:
Study type: Observational

To assess the accuracy of predicting histology with virtual chromoendoscopy for distal colorectal polyps according to the ASGE PIVI statement.

NCT ID: NCT01950117 Completed - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

Complete Removal of Neoplastic Large Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Randomized Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection or Conventional Polypectomy

Start date: September 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Recently, it was reported that the incomplete resection rate of neoplastic large polyps after conventional polypectomy was markedly high in clinical practice. The incomplete resection rate of neoplastic large polyps after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is not known. The aim of this study is to compare the incomplete resection rate of neoplastic large polyps after EMR or conventional polypectomy. The EMR technique is preferable to conventional polypectomy for the complete resection of the large polyps (>15 mm in diameter)

NCT ID: NCT01633333 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide for Colonoscopy

Start date: June 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Colonoscopy is commonly used in screening for colorectal cancer. A refined technique of colonoscopy involving the use of water as the sole modality to aid colonoscope insertion, water exchange, has been described in recent research papers to decrease patient discomfort and pain, and to reduce the need for sedation during colonoscopy when compared with standard air insufflation. Carbon dioxide insufflation has been described to decrease patient discomfort after colonoscopy. No randomized trial has so far compared the use of water exchange to carbon dioxide insufflation. Our hypothesis is that water exchange inflicts less discomfort to patients undergoing colonoscopy than carbon dioxide insufflation. Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy in two centers in Norway, one center in Poland and one center in The Netherlands will be enrolled and randomized to examination of either of the two methods.

NCT ID: NCT01607827 Completed - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

Colorectal Polypectomy Upon Insertion And Withdrawal Or Upon Withdrawal Only?

Start date: April 2004
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators aim to assess the procedure time and miss rate of polyps when performing polypectomy in the colon on the way up* and down** or only on the way down**. (* advancing the scope to the cecum, ** pulling back the scope after intubation of the cecum). Our hypothesis is that using the strategy to remove all visible polyps firstly on the way up and secondly on the way down is less time consuming and misses less polyps as with the strategy to remove polyps only on the way down.

NCT ID: NCT01553565 Completed - Colorectal Polyps Clinical Trials

Prospective Comparison of Cold Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents

Start date: March 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

1. Background: The ideal method to remove small colorectal polyps in patients who are taking antithrombotic agents is unknown. 2. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate postpolypectomy bleeding and the complete retrieval rate after the removal by colon snare transection without electrocautery for small polyps in patients who are taking antithrombotic agents. 3. Design: A prospective, consecutive study. 4. Setting: Municipal hospital outpatients. 5. Interventions: Polypectomy by cold snare technique (Cold polypectomy) was performed for colorectal polyps up to 10 mm in diameter in patients who continue to take antithrombotic agents. The primary outcome measure was bleeding within two weeks after polypectomy. Secondary outcome measure was the complete retrieval rate of colorectal polyps based on the pathological examination.