View clinical trials related to Colonoscopy.
Filter by:The goal of this cross-sectional study was to explore the relationship between physical and psychological stress and the quality of bowel preparation before a colonoscopy examination, in order to improve the quality of bowel preparation. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does physical and psychological stress affect the quality of colonoscopic bowel preparation, and delay disease detection? How can we improve the quality of colonoscopy？ Participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire containing their demographics, history of diseases and drugs, lifestyle habits, and physical and 14-item perceived stress scale(PSS-14). Quality of bowel preparation was assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale（BPS）.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the diagnostic potential of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Fecal Microbiome Testing for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is Artificial Intelligence-assisted Fecal Microbiome Testing a reliable screening test for inflammatory bowel disease? Participants will be asked to provide fecal samples to be analyzed with next-generation sequencing techniques. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted Fecal Microbiome Testing with colonoscopy to see the correlation between the results of both interventions.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the diagnostic potential of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Fecal Microbiome Testing for the diagnosis of colon cancer. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is Artificial Intelligence-assisted Fecal Microbiome Testing a reliable screening test for colon cancer? Participants will be asked to provide fecal samples to be analyzed with next-generation sequencing techniques. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted Fecal Microbiome Testing with colonoscopy to see the correlation between the results of both interventions.
The goal of this observational study is to explore the correlation between the difficulty of colonoscopy and the patients' personality in the population receiving initial colonoscopy in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The main question it aims to answer is: Whether the difficulty of colonoscopy is related to any personality score of big five personality dimensions Participants will: 1. Receive routine colonoscopy 2. Fill out the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scales 3. Fill out the Big Five Personality Questionnaire.
intraduction and aim In this study, in cases who will undergo elective day colonoscopy under sedoanalgesia; It was planned to investigate the effects of restrictive and liberal fluid administration on hemodynamics, side effects, drug levels, patient satisfaction, recovery and discharge times during the procedure. Methods This study was planned to be conducted as a prospective, randomized (closed envelope method), controlled, double-blind study with 100 adult patients aged 18-65 years in the american sociological association (ASA I-II) risk group who will undergo colonoscopy under sedation-analgesia under elective conditions.Vascular access will be opened and randomly divided into two groups as Group R (Restrictive, 2ml/kg 0.9% Sodium cloride-NaCl during colonoscopy) and Group L (Liberal 15ml/kg 0.9% NaCl during colonoscopy). For sedoanalgesia, Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg, Fentanyl 1 μg/kg, Ketamine 0.3 mg/kg will be administered intravenous (IV), followed by 10 mg additional doses of propofol until the Ramsay sedation score (RSS) is 3-4. All colonoscopy procedures will be performed by the same gastroenterologist. Expectations and scientific contributions This research may help to understand the effects of giving or not administering intravenous fluids (restrictive/liberal) prior to the procedure in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy under sedoanalgesia. It can provide hemodynamic stability, reduction in drug doses, reduction of side effects, rapid recovery and discharge, and reduction of costs.
The accuracy of endoscopic optical diagnosis for colorectal polyps has been approaching histological diagnosis after implementation of image enhancement endoscopic technologies. The real-time notification of possible nature of resected polyp after colonoscopy is expected to reduce the anxiety and depression level of the patients before the availability of histological diagnosis and improve their quality of life. We designed and conducted a randomized control trial to confirm this hypothesis.
Water exchange (WE) is an effective insertion method to minimize insertion discomfort and maximize ADR. It is characterized by infusing water to guide insertion in an airless lumen with suctioning of infused water during insertion and almost complete removal of the infused water when cecal intubation is achieved. A modified Delphi review reported water exchange showed the highest overall ADR, ADR in screening cases, and in the right side of the colon compared with water immersion and air (or CO2) insufflation. One of the plausible mechanisms of improving ADR by water exchange is salvage cleaning during insertion, which might help artificial intelligence by removing the interference of fecal debris and bubbles. However, no RCT has been performed to evaluate the effect of CADe on WE colonoscopy. Therefore, investigators will conduct a RCT comparing the ADR of CADe assisted colonoscopy inserted with either WE or insufflation. Our hypothesis will be that CADe assisted WE colonoscopy achieves higher ADR than CADe assisted air insufflation colonoscopy.
In this study, the investigators used the optical flow method to measure the colonoscopy withdrawal speed, and doctors were selected from multiple hospitals to collect prospective colonoscopy screening videos, and the percentage of colonoscopy withdrawal overspeed was calculated to explore the relationship between it based on optical flow method and the adenoma detection rate.
Nitrous oxide (commonly known as 'laughing gas') is often used during dental and other outpatient procedures, because it is easy to administer, is short-acting and rapidly clears from the body following the procedure. The investigators hypothesize that use of Nitrous oxide during GI endoscopy may enhance patient comfort during the procedure and speed-up post-procedure recovery, while minimizing the fatigue and mental fogginess some patients report the day after receiving standard sedative and narcotic drugs used routinely for the procedure. The investigators are interested in determining if adding Nitrous Oxide to commonly used sedation drugs will decrease fatigue, mental fogginess, and nausea/vomiting, as well as determine when the patient felt fully recovered from the effects of all sedatives given for the procedure.
The purpose of this project is to study the the efficacy and safety of probiotics implantation through infusion during colonoscopy in the treatment of functional constipation and irritable bowel syndrome. The study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled, cohort study. The invesitigators plan to enroll 80 patients with functional constipation and 80 patients with irritable bowel syndrome. The invesitigators will randomize the included study subjects. The experimental group receive basic treatment and a single infusion of probiotics through colonoscopy. The control group receive basic treatment and a single injection of normal saline through colonoscopy. The invesitigators will follow up the patients for 8-12 weeks. The primary endpoint is the efficacy of the single colonoscopic probiotics infusion in functional constipation and irritable bowel syndrome patients. The secondary endpoint is the safety of the single colonoscopic probiotics infusion in functional constipation and irritable bowel syndrome patients. Other exploratory objectives include the alterations in clinical indicators, fecal microbiota, and intestinal microbiota metabolites in feces and serum.