View clinical trials related to Colon Cancer.
Filter by:This clinical trial studies the effect of four different intervention components "tools" on body weight, nutrition, and physical activity in cancer survivors. Studies indicate that people with a history of cancer whose nutrition and physical activity habits are consistent with the American Cancer Society's Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines may have longer disease-free survival. The four different intervention components may help patients with a history of cancer adopt recommended health behaviors after they have completed treatment.
Recently, the use of mobile health is increasing for the purpose of managing prognosis such as recurrence, survival and quality of life by using a wearable smart band and a smartphone application. In the era of the 4th revolution, mobile health for the purpose of comprehensive prognosis for cancer patients is becoming a very good tool. It is possible to confirm the clinical significance of short-term and temporary health care through a mobile application and a smart band during the treatment process for cancer patients, but the study is insufficient to generalize the number of subjects. Therefore, for colon cancer patients who need prognosis management after surgery, we will investigate the effect of a mobile application using a smart band which has a modular structure reflecting the treatment method and treatment process after surgery. This study targets patients who underwent prostate cancer surgery. An intervention group (App+IoT device) uses a smart care application for 12 months. This application was tailored for prostate cancer patients and created by reflecting the treatment process after surgery. And they also uses a wearable smart band for 12 months. Control group is provided general education through the hospital brochure. Evaluation will be conducted 2-3days after surgery (before discharge), and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.
To learn if lifestyle changes (such as diet and exercise) combined with daily aspirin and vitamin D can affect the likelihood of advanced colorectal cancer coming back (recurring)
This is a randomized, controlled, "non-inferiority" trial to determine the non-difference in post-operative complications rate in laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis formation.
The PROJECT OBJECTIVE is to create an innovative AI-based (Artificial Intelligence) IN SILICO TECHNOLOGY for the design and optimization of T-cell receptors (TCRs) capable of recognizing specific tumor antigens presented on Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA). The technology will be based on bioinformatics (including molecular modelling) and artificial intelligence (including predictive, generative and optimization models). PROJECT TASKS are dedicated to the implementation of individual technological components (including the database necessary for their preparation) and to performing IN VITRO evaluation rounds to optimize the technology. Integration, within an IN SILICO TECHNOLOGY, of processes which currently require huge amounts of in vitro laboratory experiments that are necessary for bringing new TCR-based cancer immunotherapies into clinical trials: - finding appropriate TCRs targeting cancer neoantigen presented on a HLA molecule (pHLA) - testing for potential TCR toxicity (targeting self antigens presented on healthy tissues) - optimization of pHLA:TCR binding affinity and toxicity.
Complete mesocolic excision is currently recognized as a standard procedure for colon cancer. Controversy remains on the presence of right gastroepiploic mesentery metastasis in patients with colon cancer locating at or close to the hepatic flexure. The investigators design this study in order to define the incidence of mesogastrium metastasis and analyse the safety and surgical outcome in these patients who undergo complete mesocolic excision with right gastroepiploic mesentery resection.
This is a two-group, parallel, randomized, standard-control phase II study comparing the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in patients undergoing T4NX/TXN+ colon cancer surgery with MSI-H or POLE/ POLD1 mutations.This study was conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, Tumor Hospital of Tianjin Medical University. Patients with MSI-H or POLE/ POLD1 gene mutations confirmed by PCR sequencing or NGS sequencing will be randomly assigned (2:1) to immunotherapy (experimental group) or standard chemotherapy (control group) after signing informed consent. In this study, 30 patients will be enrolled, 20 patients will receive immunotherapy and 10 patients will receive standard chemotherapy. In the immunotherapy group, the treatment regimen was Tirelizumab 200mg, intravenously infused once every 3 weeks until the end of 12 months of treatment, with a total of 17 infused times. Patients enrolled in this group could enjoy the preferential policy of purchasing 7 times and giving 10 times at their own expense. The chemotherapy regimen of the standard chemotherapy group was XELOX regimen, oxaliplatin 130mg/m2, d1, capecitabine 1000mg/m2, orally, bid (half an hour after breakfast and dinner), d1-14, every 21 days. The duration of treatment was determined according to the patient's postoperative pathological stage (3 months for T4N0/ T1-3N1 and 6 months for T4N+/ T1-3N2). Patients received regular and periodic reviews, with imaging evaluations every 3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months after 2 years. Safety will be evaluated by AE and laboratory tests. After tumor recurrence or metastasis was first detected, tumor tissue biopsies were taken again for NGS sequencing, and all patients were followed up every 3 months until death according to the plan.
Multicenter, multinational, randomized, 2-arm, double-blind, phase II clinical study with 2000mg mesalamine, or placebo for prevention of colorectal neoplasia in Lynch Syndrome patients during and following daily intake for 2 years.
This study will assess if the CARES (Cancer Advocacy, Resources, Education and Support) intervention improves time to start of treatment after diagnosis and time to treatment completion for solid tumors (ex: lung, head, neck, thyroid, cervical, breast, bladder, colon, and rectal cancers) in rural patients.
Patients with digestive tract malignancy often experience severe and unremitting abdominal pain that negatively affects physical, emotional, and social function, as well as health related quality of life (HRQOL). Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising and evidence-based treatment modality for cancer pain. Users of VR wear a pair of goggles with a close-proximity screen in front of the eyes that creates a sensation of being transported into lifelike, three-dimensional worlds. To date, VR has been limited to short-term clinical trials for cancer pain. Moreover, limited research exists on theory-based VR modalities beyond mere distraction, such as VR that employs acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with components of biofeedback and mindfulness. To bridge these gaps, this study seeks to: (1) assess the impact of immersive VR on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including pain, activity metrics, and opioid use among patients with visceral pain from a digestive tract malignancy; (2) assess differences in PROs, activity metrics, and opioid use between skills-based VR therapy vs. distraction VR therapy; and (3) determine patient-level predictors of VR treatment response in visceral cancer pain. To address these aims, the study will measure PROs and opioid use in 360 patients randomized among 3 groups and follow them for 60 days after enrollment: (1) an enhanced VR group receiving skills-based VR; (2) a distraction-based VR group receiving patient-selected VR videos; and (3) a VR sham control group using a VR headset with 2-D content. The results will inform best practices for the implementation of VR for visceral cancer pain management and guide selection of patient-tailored experiences.