View clinical trials related to Collagen Diseases.
Filter by:A total knee replacement is the removal of parts of the knee joint, that have become damaged due to osteoarthritis, and replacing these with artificial implants. The placement of these artificial implants and how they are aligned with each other is important because they can impact overall knee function and the long-term survival of the implant. It is reported that up to 34% of all patients following total knee replacement (TKR) have poor outcomes functionally. There have been significant developments in knee replacement surgery over recent years. In particular, the introduction of robotic surgical systems, such as the NAVIO and CORI systems (Smith+Nephew Plc). The NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems are hand-held devices which can support the surgeon with the knee replacement procedure, the systems are image-free and do not require the patient to undergo any scans (such as CT scans). During the surgery, the surgeon uses the NAVIO/CORI hand-held device to map specific landmarks within the knee joint and determines the desired alignment using associated computer software. The tools to remove the bone and place the implants are controlled by the surgeon with the guidance of the NAVIO/CORI software. Comparisons of robotic systems to conventional instruments have demonstrated that robotic platforms produce fewer positioning errors in total knee replacement. This can result in more precise knee alignment and better outcomes following surgery. With both the NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems there is a reduction in radiation exposure due to them being image-free. At present, there is some evidence available for the long-term outcomes of total knee replacement implanted using robotic assistance (i.e. 2-10 years) however this study is designed to look at the early outcomes following TKR. There is no literature to date to show that robotic-assisted TKR is superior to conventional methods, within the early post-operative period (up to 12 months). This study is designed to show that the NAVIO/CORI surgical systems are better than conventional methods for TKR. The hypothesis is that they will be cost-effective, will reduce the time a patient spends in hospital following their surgery, will improve patient satisfaction during the early recovery period and will improve the patient's early post-operative mobility and function.
A first-in-human study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating, single and multiple ascending doses of VIB1116 in adult participants with rheumatic diseases.
The main objective of this study is to generate diagnosis and therapeutic-decision tools through the identification of molecular causes of PIDs with autoimmunity/inflammation and the variability in disease outcome at the transcriptional level using a combination of omics signatures (transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metagenomics, metabolomics and lipidomics).
Some patients develop "Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome," in which they experience persistent symptoms after recovering from the acute phase of COVID-19 infection. This syndrome may be more significant in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) who have been suffering from several symptoms associated to SARDs, such as myalgia, fatigue, and general pains. The transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) technique has been frequent, for example, to relieve fatigue and general pains in general population. However, to date, there are no studies evaluating this technique in ARD patients with post-acute COVID-19; therefore, the main objective of the opened study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the application of acute tDCS in ARD patients with post-acute COVID-19.
This is a pilot trial to assess feasibility and acceptability of MyVoice:Rheum vs. a patient pamphlet among female patients ages 18-44 (n=40) who receive rheumatology care. • Hypothesis: MyVoice:Rheum will be feasible and acceptable to patients who receive rheumatology care.
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a single session compared to multiple sessions of education and exercise for older adults with spinal pain treated conservatively in an advanced practice physiotherapy (APP) model of care. Methods and Analysis: In this pragmatic randomized controlled trial, 152 adults (≥ 18 years old) with neck or back pain initially referred for a consultation in neurosurgery, but treated conservatively, will be recruited through the APP neurosurgery CareAxis program in the Montreal region (Quebec, Canada). In the CareAxis program, older patients with spinal pain are triaged by an advance practice physiotherapist and are offered conservative care and only potential surgical candidates are referred to a neurosurgeon. Participants will be randomized into one of two arms: 1- a single session or 2- multiple sessions (6 sessions over 12 weeks) of education and exercise with the advance practice physiotherapist. The primary outcome measure will be the Brief Pain Inventory (pain severity and interference subscales). Secondary measures will include self-reported disability (the Neck Disability Index or Oswestry Disability Index), The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, satisfaction with care (VSQ-9 and MedRisk questionnaires), and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Participants healthcare resources use, and related costs will be measured. Outcomes will be collected at baseline and at 6, 12 and 26 weeks after enrollment. Intention-to-treat analyses will be performed, and repeated mixed-model ANOVA will assess differences between treatment arms. Cost-utility analyses will be conducted from the perspective of the health care system. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Comité d'éthique de la recherche du CIUSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (FWA00001935 and IRB00002087). Results of this study will be presented to different stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.
This is a multicentre observational study with the aim of evaluating the antibody and cellular response after vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 with Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines in frail subjects with impaired immuno-competence, due to their underlying diseases or ongoing therapies.
The Argentine Society of Rheumatology (SAR) set out to develop a national register of patients with rheumatic diseases who have received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in order to assess their efficacy and safety in this population.
The research is being done to study the immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases.
To date, studies on SARS-CoV2and vaccines have been mostly from the general population not exposed to immunosuppressants. The efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines need to be evaluated in these populations.