Chronic Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
What Objective Changes Occur With Behavioral Treatment: Evaluating Biometrics and Self -Reported Health Measures of Adult Patients Receiving Behavioral Treatments With Chronic Pain
Verified date | May 2024 |
Source | Stanford University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational [Patient Registry] |
The study will provide important information regarding the biometric changes that occur in behavioral treatments for chronic pain and explore the additional impact of integrated movement and supervised exercise. The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if pain rehabilitation programs have impacts on physical function in patient reported outcomes and objective measures of physical activity or sedentary time with a wearable Fitbit. Additionally, we will examine the associations between movement, pain acceptance, and related health factors, such as pain severity, sleep, functional status, depression, and anxiety. The addition of biometric data will allow for further investigation of the association between objective measures and patient self-report measures.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | April 25, 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | October 25, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18+ 2. Non-cancer chronic pain (pain that occurs on at least half of the days of 6 months or more) 3. English fluency 4. Ability to attend >70% treatment sessions to ensure active treatment is delivered Exclusion Criteria: 1. Cognitive impairment, non-English speaking, or psychological factors that would preclude comprehension of material and/or full participation in the study. 2. Participants with acute cauda equina syndrome 3. Inability to complete a 6 minute walk test without LOB 3) Chronic pain as explained by inflammatory disease For the movement-based portions of group: Exclusion: For our CBT + Movement (low intensity/ restorative) movement group: Patient must be able to sit upright for 20 minutes without loss of balance or upper extremity (UE) assistance. Inability to sit without use of UE support would be excluded. This ensures safety that the participant can completed the adapted movement program without risk of falls. HR will not be elevated > 50% HRmax in these restorative movement classes. Exclusion criteria for the Back in ACTion (higher intensity) movement group is inability to complete a 6-minute walk test safely or without loss of balance, as this poses a fall risk that requires individual assistance throughout the class, or medical exclusion from cardiovascular exercise over 50% HRmax, as HR will be elevated to 50-70% HR max in these classes. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Stanford Pain Management Clinic | Redwood City | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Stanford University |
United States,
Karayannis NV, Sturgeon JA, Kemani MK, Mackey SC, Greco CM, Wicksell RK, McCracken LM. Pain acceptance and psychological inflexibility predict pain interference outcomes for persons with chronic pain receiving pain psychology. Scand J Pain. 2023 Feb 7;23(3):464-475. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0107. Print 2023 Jul 26. — View Citation
Mercer K, Li M, Giangregorio L, Burns C, Grindrod K. Behavior Change Techniques Present in Wearable Activity Trackers: A Critical Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Apr 27;4(2):e40. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4461. — View Citation
Neumann A, Hampel P. Long-term effects of rehabilitation and prevention of further chronification of pain among patients with non-specific low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(6):1257-1268. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210221. — View Citation
Pears S, Sutton S. Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) interventions for promoting physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;15(1):159-184. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1727759. Epub 2020 Feb 17. — View Citation
Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 28;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. eCollection 2017. — View Citation
You DS, Ziadni MS, Cooley CE, Talavera DC, Mackey SC, Poupore-King H. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in real-world patients with chronic back pain: A pilot cohort data analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(6):965-973. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200305. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in sedentary behavior time | Sedentary behavior is defined as any waking behavior such as sitting or leaning with an energy expenditure of 1.5 metabolic equivalent task (MET) or less | Pre intervention (baseline), and post intervention (at 10 weeks) | |
Secondary | HF-Heart rate variability | Heart rate variability (per participant) is where the amount of time between your heartbeats fluctuates slightly. Even though these fluctuations are undetectable except with specialized devices, they can still indicate current or future health problems, including heart conditions and mental health issues like anxiety and depression. Heart rate variability (in milliseconds) has no standard reference range. HF is the high frequency band of HRV. | Pre intervention (baseline), end of treatment session (week 6), and post intervention (at 10 weeks) | |
Secondary | Sleep Duration | Amount of time asleep per "night cycle" | Pre intervention (baseline), end of treatment session (week 6), and post intervention (at 10 weeks) | |
Secondary | Daily Step Count | Amount of steps occurring in a 24 hour day | Pre intervention (baseline), end of treatment session (week 6), and post intervention (at 10 weeks) | |
Secondary | Pain Catastrophizing | 13-item self-report measure designed to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults. The score ranges from 0-52, where higher scores indicate greater pain catastrophizing. | Pre intervention (baseline), and post intervention (at 10 weeks) and 6 months follow up (post group) | |
Secondary | PROMIS Depression Score | Self reported Questionnaires to assess depression. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression use a T-score metric, and the scores range from 10T to 85T, with the population mean score of 50T (SD of 10). Higher T scores would indicate worse symptom in each domain. | Pre intervention (baseline), and post intervention (at 10 weeks),and 6 months follow up (post group) | |
Secondary | PROMIS Anxiety Score | Self reported Questionnaires to assess anxiety. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety measures use a T-score metric, and the scores range from 10T to 85T, with the population mean score of 50T (SD of 10). Higher T scores would indicate worse symptom in each domain. | Pre intervention (baseline), and post intervention (at 10 weeks),and 6 months follow up (post group) | |
Secondary | PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score | Self reported Questionnaires to assess sleep quality. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) , Sleep Disturbance use a T-score metric, and the scores range from 10T to 85T, with the population mean score of 50T (SD of 10). Higher T scores would indicate worse symptom in each domain. | Pre intervention (baseline), and post intervention (at 10 weeks),and 6 months follow up (post group) | |
Secondary | PROMIS Physical Function Score | Self reported Questionnaires to assess physical function/mobility. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function measures use a T-score metric, and the scores range from 10T to 85T, with the population mean score of 50T (SD of 10). Higher T scores would indicate worse symptom in each domain. | Pre intervention (baseline), and post intervention (at 10 weeks),and 6 months follow up (post group) | |
Secondary | PROMIS Pain Interference Score | Self-reported Questionnaires to assess pain interference. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), pain interference, and physical function measures use a T-score metric, and the scores range from 10T to 85T, with the population mean score of 50T (SD of 10). Higher T scores would indicate worse symptom in each domain. | Pre intervention (baseline), and post intervention (at 10 weeks),and 6 months follow up (post group) | |
Secondary | Duration of Heart Rate in Exercise Zones (50-70% HRMax) (during exercise) | The time in a 24 hour period that the participant has an elevated heartrate for sustained duration indicating exercise.
We would want to increase our amount of time (minutes) in HRzones to indicate more time spend in active exercise during the movement portions of the interventions. |
Pre intervention (baseline), and post intervention (at 10 weeks) | |
Secondary | Average Resting Heartrate | A 2013 study in the journal Heart tracked the cardiovascular health of about 3,000 men for 16 years and found that a high resting heart rate was linked with lower physical fitness and higher blood pressure, body weight, and levels of circulating blood fats. The researchers also discovered that the higher a person's resting heart rate, the greater the risk of premature death. Specifically, an RHR between 81 and 90 doubled the chance of death, while an RHR higher than 90 tripled it.
A low resting heart rate often suggests greater physical fitness. A reduction in average resting heart rate would indicate improvement in CV fitness for our treatment interventions. |
Pre intervention (baseline), end of treatment session (week 6), and post intervention (at 10 weeks) | |
Secondary | Physical Activity Vital Sign | the subjective measure of minutes a person is physically active in a week (in minutes) | Pre intervention (baseline), end of treatment session (week 6), and post intervention (at 10 weeks) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01659073 -
Using Perfusion MRI to Measure the Dynamic Changes in Neural Activation Associated With Caloric Vestibular Stimulation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05914311 -
Use of Dermabond in Mitigation of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Trial Lead Migration
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05422456 -
The Turkish Version of Functional Disability Inventory
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05422443 -
The Turkish Version of Pain Coping Questionnaire
|
||
Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04385030 -
Neurostimulation and Mirror Therapy in Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05103319 -
Simultaneous Application of Ketamine and Lidocaine During an Ambulatory Infusion Therapy as a Treatment Option in Refractory Chronic Pain Conditions
|
||
Completed |
NCT03687762 -
Back on Track to Healthy Living Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04171336 -
Animal-assisted Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03179475 -
Targin® for Chronic Pain Management in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03418129 -
Neuromodulatory Treatments for Pain Management in TBI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03268551 -
MEMO-Medical Marijuana and Opioids Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06204627 -
TDCS* and Laterality Trainnning in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06060028 -
The Power of Touch. Non-Invasive C-Tactile Stimulation for Chronic Osteoarthritis Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05496205 -
A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05118204 -
Randomized Trial of Buprenorphine Microdose Inductions During Hospitalization
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT03538444 -
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Opiate Use Disorder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05036499 -
PFI for Pain-Related Anxiety Among Hazardous Drinkers With Chronic Pain
|
N/A |