Turkish Validity & Reliability of Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C)

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Perception of chronic pain and related disability; occurs through the interaction of physiological and psychological processes. Pain catastrophizing is a cognitive attribution style characterized by a negative mindset and magnification of pain. Catastrophizing in children has been associated with poor functioning and higher levels of pain. Catastrophizing during the transition to adulthood is defined as an important predictor of persistent pain and central sensitivity. The number of scales assessing pain and attitudes related to pain in children is quite low. In recent years, with the adaptation of the assessment scales used for adults to children or the development of new scales, the assessment of pain and pain-related attitudes in children has begun to be provided. Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), in 1995 Sullivan et al. for the purpose of comprehensive assessment in adults experiencing pain-related disasters. In 2003, Crombez et al. showed the validity and reliability of the scale in school-age children. For predictive validity, the scale was administered to children with chronic pain, and it was reported to predict the severity of pain and pain-related disability. Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C) scale; It is a self-report measure adapted from the Adult Pain Catastrophizing Scale used to assess negative thinking associated with pain. It contains 13 items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = "not at all true" to 4 = "very true". Substances; rumination (4 items, e.g. "When [my child] has pain, I can't get him out of my mind"), magnification (3 items, e.g. the child has pain], thinking about other painful events"), and helplessness (6 items, e.g. "[My child's]] When I have pain, I feel that I cannot continue"). Items are aggregated across subscales to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 52; higher scores are related to higher catastrophizing attitude. The pain catastrophizing scale was originally developed in German and later validity and reliability studies were conducted in different languages. The aim of this study is to question the Turkish validity and reliability of the "Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C)" scale.

Clinical Trial Description

Now, the study is continuing. 50% of the participant were evaluated. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05436301
Study type	Observational
Source	Kutahya Health Sciences University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	October 15, 2022
Completion date	January 15, 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT01659073` - Using Perfusion MRI to Measure the Dynamic Changes in Neural Activation Associated With Caloric Vestibular Stimulation	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05914311` - Use of Dermabond in Mitigation of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Trial Lead Migration	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05422456` - The Turkish Version of Functional Disability Inventory
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05422443` - The Turkish Version of Pain Coping Questionnaire
Completed	`NCT05057988` - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04385030` - Neurostimulation and Mirror Therapy in Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06206252` - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Completed	`NCT05103319` - Simultaneous Application of Ketamine and Lidocaine During an Ambulatory Infusion Therapy as a Treatment Option in Refractory Chronic Pain Conditions
Completed	`NCT03687762` - Back on Track to Healthy Living Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT04171336` - Animal-assisted Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Chronic Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT03179475` - Targin® for Chronic Pain Management in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03418129` - Neuromodulatory Treatments for Pain Management in TBI	N/A
Completed	`NCT03268551` - MEMO-Medical Marijuana and Opioids Study
Recruiting	`NCT06060028` - The Power of Touch. Non-Invasive C-Tactile Stimulation for Chronic Osteoarthritis Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06204627` - TDCS* and Laterality Trainnning in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT00983385` - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05118204` - Randomized Trial of Buprenorphine Microdose Inductions During Hospitalization	Phase 4
Terminated	`NCT03538444` - Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Opiate Use Disorder	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05812703` - Biometrics and Self-reported Health Changes in Adults Receiving Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Pain
Completed	`NCT05036499` - PFI for Pain-Related Anxiety Among Hazardous Drinkers With Chronic Pain	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Turkish Validity and Reliability of Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child (PCS-C)

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms