Improving Spinal Cord Stimulation With ECAPS

Chronic Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Improving Spinal Cord Stimulation With ECAPS

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04938245
• Other study ID #: NEUROSURG-2021-29717
• Status: Recruiting
• Start date: August 18, 2021
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: University of Minnesota
• Contact: David Darrow, MD, MPH
• Phone: (612)-634-6666
• Email: darro015[@]umn.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study will be to investigate the optimization of spinal cord stimulation with ECAPs in patients with spinal cord implants.

Description:

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or electrical stimulation in the epidural space of the spinal canal has been used for more than 50 years to treat chronic pain by modulating the activity of the spinal cord or spinal cord roots. While originally conceived out of gate theory, the precise effects of spinal cord stimulation are still an active area of research. Certainly there are multiple factors contributing to this unchanged responder rate including diagnosis, psychosocial factors, comorbidities, and implementation gaps, but a major technical hurdle remains personalizing therapy to engage in the precise pain circuits for each individual patient in anatomic location and over time. The delivery of spinal cord stimulation varies significantly with changes in position due to the movement of the spinal cord and its associated nerve roots. Existing spinal cord stimulation platforms rely on tonic stimulation with minimal adjustment with movements of the spinal cord or any adjustment due to changing physiology. Tonic stimulation assumes a stationary system that does not account for short or long-term effects of plasticity or movement. However, the effect of stimulation on the circuits of the spinal cord as with all stimulation of the nervous system can be measured through an event-related potential (ERP) synchronized to stimulation pulses, called the evoked compound action potential (ECAP). As an evoked-response, it is clear that ECAPs may provide a more dynamic insight into the underlying electrophysiologic system underlying the anatomic pathways of chronic pain, and some reports have correlated ECAPs to measures of pain relief, which is difficult to disassociate in patients with stable patterns of pain. The spatial variance of ECAP may imply that spinal cord stimulation for the purposes of pain relief is not homologous to features available in the ECAP signal but could be accessible in the variability of ECAP signal. Similarly, very little experimental evidence exists to incorporate the complex role of pain processing and valuation systems into a model of ECAP electrophysiology. Namely, the correlation between top-down control and higher-order (cognitive/mood) circuit interactions with ECAP features and chronic pain. Understanding the electrophysiology of evoked responses in the spinal cord in the competitive market of non-opioid pain relief should be grounded in basic pain phenotype modeling. This proposal represents the first step in that pathway by studying the feasibility of capturing ECAPs during clinical externalization while collecting the necessary data for behavioral modeling for future causal analysis with ECAP features. This protocol establishes the first step towards closed-loop stimulation through open-loop measurement and stimulation during an existing clinical paradigm. This study aims to understand the feasibility of implementing ECAP during the externalization period of a clinical trial while simultaneously providing clinical feedback for optimal settings discovered during testing.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 15
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 22 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Medically stable as determined by the principal investigator
• Scheduled to undergo externalization of spinal cord stimulation
• English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

• Scheduled for permanent implantation only without trial
• Have pacemakers or other neurostimulators
• Pregnancy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Pain

Intervention

Device:
• Spinal Cord Stimulation
Intraoperatively, stimulation at 12 Hz will be performed as the leads are moved into the targeted position. Amplitude will be increased to 15 mA maximum total until a response is seen on any electrode and held for 10 seconds. Stimulation and recording will be performed using the Neuralynx stim/record system. Post-operatively, the electrodes will be tested for impedance by the clinical system and then they will be connected to the Neuralynx stim/record system. Electrode stimulation patterns will be applied with increasing amplitude until ECAPs responses are seen on recording electrodes. 42 Hz stimulation will be performed with an amplitude sweep of 0mA-10mA. At each amplitude, stimulation will be applied for 4 seconds followed by 2 seconds of rest. Pulse width will be varied from 30-450 microseconds to test effective amplitude. Bursting stimulation will be applied to detect differences in ECAPs as above.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Minnesota	Minneapolis	Minnesota

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Minnesota

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Correlation of ECAP peak to peak signals to programming parameters		2 weeks
Other	Correlation of ECAP signals to pain relief		2 weeks
Other	Stability and reliability of ECAP sensing		2 weeks
Other	Reliability of ECAP across various levels intraoperatively		2 weeks
Primary	Feasibility Assessed by Enrollment	Feasibility will be measured as a number of the number of enrolled participants who complete at least 80% of the planned assessments.	2 weeks
Secondary	Acceptability Assessed by Survey	Acceptability will be measured as the average rating of a five-point qualitative scale ranging from "Excellent" to "Very Poor." Scores range with 1-5 with lower scores indicating greater acceptability.	2 weeks