The Effect of Matrix Rhythm Therapy in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

Chronic Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Effectiveness of a Novel Massage Method Matrix Rhythm Therapy in Chronic Neck Pain

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04696341
• Other study ID #: 25.01.2011/02
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 25, 2011
• Est. completion date: May 6, 2011

Study information

• Verified date: January 2021
• Source: Pamukkale University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Thirty individuals with chronic neck pain randomised into two groups. Group I (15 subjects) received a total of 10 sessions as 5 sessions a week.Hot pack to cervical and upper thoracic regions (20 minutes), conventional Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) (100 Hz for 40 μsec), therapeutic ultrasound (1 Megahertz (MHz) for 5 minutes) and conventional massage were applied. Five sessions of Matrix Rhythm Therapy (2., 5., 6., 8., 10. sessions of combined physiotherapy programme) was added at combined physiotherapy Group II. Matrix Rhythm Therapy was applied to cervical and thoracic regions using 10 Hz frequency for 30 minutes.

Pain intensity was measured using by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring 10 cm. Muscle spasm in cervical region was assessed by using a VAS measuring 10 cm. Turkish version of Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used to assess the disability caused by neck pain. Turkish version of Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess emotional status of participants.

Description:

The study included patients aged between 25-65 years who had neck pain for at least 3 months. Patients with radiculopathy who had motor findings, who underwent any operations due to neck problems, who had systemic, neurologic and psychiatric diseases, inflammatory or infectious diseases, history of malignity, congenital anomalies, who benefited from another therapy modality and the ones in whom physical therapy modalities could not be used due to contraindications (individuals with sensory disorders, who use cardiac pace maker) were excluded from the study.

A total of 36 individuals were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Randomization was allocated by numbered envelopes method. A total of 30 subjects (15 in Matrix Rhythm Therapy (MRT) group and 15 in CG) with neck pain due to mechanic causes like cervical discopathy, cervical arthrosis or myofascial pain syndrome were participated in this study.

All assessments were done by the same physiotherapist (FU) before therapy and at the end of treatment sessions. The physiotherapist who did the assessments did not know to which group the subjects were belonged. Another physiotherapist who was not informed about the results of the evaluation treated the patients.

Home-based exercise programs and recommendations were also given to patients. Matrix Rhythm Therapy is developed by Dr. Ulrich G. Randall at the university of Erlangen/Nuremberg. Longitudinal stroking, compression and spooning techniques are specific methods of MRT. Therapies of the patients were done by the physiotherapist who had certificate of MRT application.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: May 6, 2011
• Est. primary completion date: April 8, 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Having neck pain for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

• radiculopathy with motor findings

• undergoing surgical operation for neck pathologies

• having a systemic , neurologic, psychiatric diseases

• inflammatory or infectious diseases targeting this region

• physical therapy modalities could not be used due to contraindications (individuals with sensory disorders, who use cardiac pace maker)

• pregnancy

• malignancy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Pain
• Neck Pain
• Physical Disability

Intervention

Procedure:
• Matrix Rhythm Therapy
Hot pack to cervical and upper thoracic regions (20 min), conventional TENS (100 Hz for 40 µsec), therapeutic ultrasound (1 MHz for 5 min) and conventional massage (using stroking, kneading and friction techniques for 5 minutes) were applied as passive physiotherapy modalities. Normal range of motion exercises, posture exercises, stretching exercises and isometric exercises were instructed as part of active physiotherapy.Five sessions of MRT (2., 5., 6., 8., 10. sessions of combined physiotherapy programme) was added at combined physiotherapy to Matrix Rhythm Group. Matrix Rhythm Therapy was applied to cervical and thoracic regions using 10 Hz frequency for 30 min (15 min for right and left sides each) according to the instructions of the technique developer.
• Control
Hot pack to cervical and upper thoracic regions (20 min), conventional TENS (100 Hz for 40 µsec), therapeutic ultrasound (1 MHz for 5 min) and conventional massage (using stroking, kneading and friction techniques for 5 minutes) were applied as passive physiotherapy modalities. Normal range of motion exercises, posture exercises, stretching exercises and isometric exercises were instructed as part of active physiotherapy.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Turkey	Sarayköy Vocational School	Denizli

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Pamukkale University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (3)

Smidt N, de Vet HC, Bouter LM, Dekker J, Arendzen JH, de Bie RA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Helders PJ, Keus SH, Kwakkel G, Lenssen T, Oostendorp RA, Ostelo RW, Reijman M, Terwee CB, Theunissen C, Thomas S, van Baar ME, van 't Hul A, van Peppen RP, Verhagen A, v — View Citation

Taspinar F, Aslan UB, Sabir N, Cavlak U. Implementation of matrix rhythm therapy and conventional massage in young females and comparison of their acute effects on circulation. J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Oct;19(10):826-32. doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.0932. E — View Citation

Ylinen J. Physical exercises and functional rehabilitation for the management of chronic neck pain. Eura Medicophys. 2007 Mar;43(1):119-32. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Pain intensity	Pain intensity was measured using by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring 10 cm (0: I have no pain, 10: I have an intolerable pain). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.	Baseline
Primary	Muscle spasm	Muscle spasm in cervical region was assessed by using a VAS measuring 10 cm (0: no spasm, 10: the most severe spasm). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.	Baseline
Primary	Disability	Turkish version of Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used to assess the disability caused by neck pain. NDI is composed of a total of 10 questions of which 4 about subjective symptoms Each section is scored between 0 and 5. For total scores 0-4 no disability, 5-14 mild disability, 15-24 moderate disability, 25-34 severe disability, 35-50 complete disability	Baseline
Primary	Emotional status	Turkish version of Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess emotional status of participants. Each question of the questionnaire which is composed of 21 questions is scored between 0 and 3. Higher scores than 17 mean risc for depression.	Baseline
Secondary	Pain intensity	Pain intensity was measured using by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring 10 cm	2 weeks
Secondary	Muscle spasm	Muscle spasm in cervical region was assessed by using a VAS measuring 10 cm (0: no spasm, 10: the most severe spasm)	2 weeks
Secondary	Disability	Turkish version of Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used to assess the disability caused by neck pain. NDI is composed of a total of 10 questions of which 4 about subjective symptoms Each section is scored between 0 and 5 caused by neck pain. For total scores 0-4 no disability, 5-14 mild disability, 15-24 moderate disability, 25-34 severe disability, 35-50 complete disability	2 weeks
Secondary	Emotional status	Turkish version of Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess emotional status of participants. Each question of the questionnaire which is composed of 21 questions is scored between 0 and 3. Higher scores than 17 means risc for depression.	2 weeks