View clinical trials related to Chemotherapeutic Toxicity.
Filter by:The investigators use the cancer registration system of National Cheng Kung University Hospital to timely screen and evaluate those patients having breast cancer or lymphoma to enroll patients to participate in this clinical trial. The investigators planned an earlier initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment on breast cancer and lymphoma patients before the chemotherapy, and starting therapeutic intervention by Sacubitril/Valsartan once the heart damage sign appeared via novel echocardiography. The investigators aim to assess the protective and therapeutic benefit of cardioprotective drugs on the cardiotoxicity of anti-cancer therapy.
With this prospective, observational study, we would like to investigate the effect of instillation therapy using BCG or mitomycin C on short- and long-term irritative and obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms using validated questionnaires. The study will objectify the lower urinary tract symptoms and thereby provide better recommendations for therapy with mitomycin C or BCG.
The MyBrain study investigates the brain function of children, adolescents and young adults during and after chemo treatment for cancer. The tests include 1) cognitive skills such as memory and attention; 2) the brain's electrical activity; 3) and biological markers related to brain function. The aim of the study is to better understand the trajectories of cognitive functioning and measures that have been associated with cognitive impairment in patients treated with chemotherapy.
Childhood cancers represent less than 1% of the malignant diseases diagnosed worldwide. Treatment modalities for childhood malignancies will differ depending on the diagnosis. The main treatments may include chemotherapy (QT), radiation therapy (RT), and surgery. The toxicity caused by QT and RT generates adverse effects in the mouth, among them oral mucositis (MO). MO is damage that occurs to the oral mucosa and these lesions are extremely painful, uncomfortable, and cause great morbidity for patients. The main treatment of MO is intraoral photobiomodulation therapy (TBMI), this therapy has been widely used, reducing the severity and pain of MO in patients. The use of extraoral photobiomodulation therapy (TFBME) has been employed in some recent studies and has shown efficacy for reducing and improving the severity of OM. The present study aims to compare the effect of two protocols of photobiomodulation therapy (TFBM) using intraoral and extraoral low power laser in the prevention and treatment of OM in pediatric oncology patients receiving treatment with high dose metrotexate (MTX-HD) and its chemotherapy combinations. Initially, 34 pediatric and adolescent oncology patients receiving intravenous (IV) QT from risk protocols will be selected. Participants will be allocated into 2 groups: Group I: TFBMI (n=17) and Group II: TFBME (n=17). The study will be conducted by a dental surgeon who will perform the initial assessment and reassessments (blinded to the groups) and another who will apply the TFBM. Patients will be evaluated daily from day 1 (D1 - beginning of the chemotherapy cycle) until D10 or until healing of the lesions. The evaluation will consist of oral mucosa examination for grading of OM, pain assessment, quality of life, oral health, depressionand saliva evaluation of patients to assess. The analyses will be performed in the PASW 18.0 program, initially the evaluation of the data distribution will be performed by applying the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. If, after applying these tests, the data show a normal distribution (p>0.05), the t-test will be used. If the distribution is non-normal after the application of the tests (p<0.05), the Wilcoxon test will be used. The p value will be set at 5%. Logistic regression will be used in adjusted models to estimate the probability of occurrence of OM.
This study will formally test the quality improvement intervention of an EMR based tool that informs medical oncologists visiting a patient for the first time of potential risk of chemotherapy toxicity.
In recent years, the treatment paradigm for hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative disease has shifted from "chemotherapy for visceral disease" and "hormone therapy for bone disease" to "chemotherapy only for visceral crises or endocrine resistance". In recent years, CDK4/6 inhibitors have been added to the therapeutic arsenal. A meta-analysis of clinical trials of first-line metastatic CDK4/6 inhibitors showed an improvement in progression-free survival but an increase in toxicities compared to endocrine therapy alone. Other commonly used oral therapies for breast cancer are mTOR inhibitors and capecitabine. Other oral molecules will be added to the therapeutic arsenal in the coming years (e.g. alpelisib and tucatinib), each with specific toxicities. Newer targeted therapies given in combination with endocrine therapies for breast cancer (eg with palbociclib, everolimus, and capecitabine) pose a challenge to health care providers because they are oral drugs. For "traditional" intravenous chemotherapy, patients must go to the hospital regularly, which allows close care by a team of doctors, pharmacists and nurses dedicated to breast cancer. On the other hand, for oral agents, monitoring is less systematic. Monitoring and managing the toxicities of oral treatments becomes a challenge. Suboptimal management of side effects can compromise patients' adherence to their treatment, have a negative impact on their side effects and increase costs for the healthcare system. Systematic follow-up is therefore necessary. In the information age, public access to the Internet is increasing and most households in the province of Quebec now have access to the Internet, either on a smart phone, tablet or computer. Recent studies have shown that having a system to "self-report" side effects could even improve the survival of cancer patients and reduce costs. Apps allow patients to take an active role in their healthcare. With the availability of an increasing number of oral therapies, monitoring the toxicities experienced by these patients is becoming a challenge and oncology teams need tools to help them ensure patient safety. At the same time, patients clearly want more information. The potential benefits and ease of use of web interfaces and patient portals for the management of oral therapy toxicities are appealing, but there is a lack of studies on them.
The goal of this observational study is to demonstrate the ability of using non-invasive Phosphorus (31P) Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) to monitor changes of in-vivo markers of mitochondrial function in skeletal and cardiac muscles in muscles in large B- or T-cell lymphoma patients during treatment with (R-)CHOP. The main question it aims to answer is: • Can 31P-MRS be used to monitor changes of in vivo markers of mitochondrial function in skeletal and cardiac muscles in large B- or T-cell lymphoma patients during treatment with (R-)CHOP? To be able to answer this main question, participants will undergo 31P-MRS imaging of the calf muscles and of the heart 3 times during the study period.
PROMs questionnaires seem to be an effective tool to obtain a greater knowledge of the physical and emotional state of patients. Despite this, few studies have been performed using patient reported outcomes in Head & Neck (H&N) cancer patients during and after treatment. The use of a novel topical mucosa composition (Saliactive®) is studied along the use of questionnaires.
Observational, clinical study. Intention to include 40 patients (20 patients treated with trabectedin and 20 with cisplatin hypersensitivity) The investigators investigate the role of trabectedin in combination with PLD and cisplatin in treating platinum sensitive ROC being allergic to carboplatin. The investigators focus on adverse events and evaluate if these are tolerable for the patients and further evaluate the measurable treatment effect on the tumor burden.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Docetaxel combined with Platinum-based drugs compared with Docetaxel alone for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients carrying DNA repair mutation.