View clinical trials related to Cardiomyopathies.
Filter by:Aim: to compare the treatment effects of Bisoprolol (beta 1 receptor specific beta blocker (BB)) and Verapamil (cardio-specific calcium channel blockers (CCB)) in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall and a hypercontracted state of the sarcomeres. This narrows the left ventricular cavity, but though the left ejection fraction is increased the stroke volume and the cardiac output cannot be fully compensated. The disease manifestations can be mild or develop into severe functional limitations and devastating complications at early age. Dyspnea, chest pain, palpitations and syncope are the most common symptoms, and patients are at risk of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Arrhythmias and sudden cardiac deaths may precede heart failure symptoms. Patients with symptomatic HCM are treated initially with beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. However, there is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of this guideline-recommended treatment in HCM. Methods: The study is a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. Patients are randomized in to three 35-days treatment periods with Bisoprolol, Verapamil and Placebo. Each treatment period includes a 7-days up titration period, a 21-days target dose period and a 7-days down titration period. Between treatment periods 45 days treatment pause is allowed. End point will be evaluated at day 21 (- 4 days). Patients will be evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise test, echocardiography, 7 day Holter-monitoring, biomarkers and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). A subgroup of patients will also be evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Hypotheses: Three separate phases each with one primary effect parameters will be analyzed between treatment with Bisoprolol and Verapamil: Phase 1: The maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is different (ΔVO2 max ≥1 ml/kg/min) between treatments in non-obstructive HCM patients Phase 2: The left ventricular enddiastolic volume (LVvol) is different (ΔLVvol ≥3 ml) between treatments in non-obstructive HCM patients. Phase 3: The incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is different (Hazard ratio ≥ 0.5) between treatments in non-obstructive HCM patients. The trial will be performed and analyzed in three phases, and each phase may be unblinded and analyzed separately.
BRITISH is a UK multicentre trial of patients who have been diagnosed with heart failure due to Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (NICM, or heart failure that is not caused by blocked heart arteries. Participants will be randomised into two groups. Half the participants will receive an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) and the other half will not. The aim of the study will be to compare all-cause mortality (death from any cause) between these two groups at 36 months, and longer-term to 10 years. The study has the potential to change international heart failure treatment guidelines and to improve how patients with this condition are managed.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with LVEF of ≤35% and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, approximately one-third of CRT-recipients do not improve after therapy (non-responders), despite meeting the required criteria. Previous studies have documented that the positive respons to CRT is related to the delayed electrical activation of the left ventricle in patients with LBBB. It has also been illustrated that non-ischemic CRT-candidates with LBBB demonstrate lower regional myocardial blood flow and metabolism in the septum. Additionally, it has been suggested that LBBB can lead to impaired coronary blood flow in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). This observation is based on an echocardiography-based study, that showed that the percentage of diastolic flow duration (%DD) in LAD was shorter in patients with LBBB compared to the control-group and patients with right-ventricular pacing. It has been demonstrated that CRT has positive effects on septal myocardial perfusion in patients with HF and LBBB. The dominant hypothesis explaining this phenomenon is built on improved septal myocardial work after CRT-implantation, which leads to increased myocardial energy and therefore increased myocardial perfusion. In contrast, it has been suggested that due to re-established synchronous left ventricular electrical activation, CRT reduces the septal intramyocardial pressure in early diastole, leading to a relatively longer antegrade flow duration in LAD. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of CRT on coronary blood flow in LAD in patients with non-ischemic HF and LBBB. The investigators hypothesize that increased LV-function after CRT not only is due to resynchronized LV ejection and filling, but also improved coronary flow. The study aims to enroll 60 patients with heart failure due to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, LBBB, with or without CRT. All patients meeting the criteria will be recruited from the outpatient clinic at the Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital. Invasive flow measurements in the LAD, including fractional flow reserve (FFR), absolute coronary flow and -reserve will be conducted with the CRT on and off, respectively.
Cardiomyopathy refers to a diverse group of myocardial diseases with multiple causes. In 1995, the World Health Organization classified cardiomyopathies into hypertrophic, dilated, restrictive, and mixed type. This classification is based on the pathophysiology of the disease. However, with rapid evolution of molecular genetics in cardiology, the American Heart Association in 2006 has classified cardiomyopathies into two major groups based on predominant organ involvement and etiology; Primary cardiomyopathies are those solely or predominantly confined to heart muscle and are relatively few in number. Secondary cardiomyopathies show pathologic myocardial involvement as part of a large number and variety of generalized systemic (multiorgan) disorders.Current evidence supports the use of genetic testing in clinical practice to improve risk stratification for clinically affected patients and their at-risk relatives for cardiomyopathies.
Subclinical diastolic dysfunction represents the early phase of diabetic cardiomyopathy and is a common complication among type 2 diabetic patients that increases mortality rate among those patients and can progress to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Trimetazidine is an anti-ischemic agent widely used in the treatment of coronary artery disease and it has positive effects on energy metabolism in heart failure. Therefore, we hypothesized that trimetazidine may have potential benefit on the amelioration of the inflammatory insult and improving the clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy especially if applied in the early stages.
Sepsis is a life-threatening infection with increasing incidence, and its spectrum of disease can involve cardiac dysfunction, which further adds to mortality. Although cardiac involvement in sepsis has been classically attributed to systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction is increasingly diagnosed due to new echocardiographic techniques and the conceptual evolution of diastolic dysfunction. Combining systolic and diastolic dysfunction assessment could lead to a better diagnosis of septic cardiac dysfunction. Furthermore, earlier forms of septic cardiac dysfunction could be more promptly recognized by measuring novel and less used parameters of diastolic dysfunction. We hypothesize that left atrium (LA) strain and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) derived intervals could be new and earlier predictors of diastolic dysfunction in septic patients with a potential impact on clinical presentation and prognosis and that rare genetic variation associated with inherited cardiomyopathies could underline the risk and severity of sepsis-related myocardial dysfunction with potential impact on diagnosis and prognosis.
The purpose of the study is to investigate the superiority of chronic left bundle branch area pacing compared to traditional right ventricular (RV) septal pacing in patients with high-grade conduction disease after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this investigator initiated, multicenter, prospective, double-blinded, crossover study, chronic left bundle branch area pacing will be compared to chronic right ventricular septal pacing using echocardiographic measures of left ventricular systolic function in patients with a high cumulative ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important clinical sequela in patients with structural heart disease. VT generally occurs as a result of electrical re-entry in the presence of arrhythmogenic substrate (scar). Scar tissue forms due to an ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) from prior coronary obstructive disease or a non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) from an inflammatory or genetic disease. AADs can reduce VT recurrence, but have significant limitations in treatment of VT. For example, amiodarone has high rates of side effects/toxicities and a finite effective usage before recurrence. ICDs prevent cardiac arrest and sudden death from VT, but do not stop VT occurring. Recurrent VT and ICD therapies decrease QOL, increase hospital visits, mortality, morbidity and risk of death. Improvement in techniques for mapping and ablation of VT have made CA an alternative. Currently, there is limited evidence to guide clinicians either toward AAD therapy or CA in patients with NICM. This data shows significant benefit of CA over medical therapy in terms of VT free survival, survival free of VT storm and VT burden. Observational studies suggest that CA is effective in eliminating VT in NICM patients who have failed AADs, resulting in reduction of VT burden and AAD use over long term follow up. Furthermore, there is limited data on the efficacy of CA in early ICM with VT, or advanced ICM with VT. RCT data is almost exclusively on patients with modest ICM with VT, and this is not representative of the real-world scenario of patients with structural heart disease presenting with VT. Therefore the primary objective is to determine in all patients with structural heart disease and spontaneous or inducible VT, if catheter ablation compared to standard medical therapy with anti-arrhythmic drugs results in a reduction of a composite endpoint of recurrent VT, VT storm and death at a median follow up of 18 months.
The "Long-term Outcome and Predictors for Recurrence after Medical and Interventional Treatment of Arrhythmias at the University Heart Center Hamburg" (TRUST) study is an investor-initiated, single-center, prospective clinical cohort study including patients treated with cardiac arrhythmias or at high risk for cardiac arrhythmias. The design enables prospective, low-threshold, near complete inclusion of patients with arrhythmias treated at the UHZ. Collection of routine follow-up data, detailed procedural information and systematic biobanking will enable precise and robust phenotyping.
Chagas disease is an endemic problem in Latin America, where millions of people are chronically infected with T. cruzi. Recently, it was assumed to have clinical and epidemiological relevance in several other countries due to migratory and globalizing social factors. CCC occurs in 30-50% of infected individuals, causing considerable morbidity/mortality rates. Heart failure is the most prevalent morbidity. While CRT and drug treatment have been advocated and implemented without much success to improve the clinical condition of patients with CCC, there is no consistent scientific evidence on the role of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) as a form of adjuvant treatment for heart failure in patients with CCC. The hypothesis of this study is that patients with CCC, advanced heart failure, severe systolic dysfunction, and non-LBB have better clinical and functional responses when undergoing implantation of a CCM device than when undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.