Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03669328
Other study ID # 16HLGENF01
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 1, 2016
Est. completion date June 30, 2018

Study information

Verified date August 2018
Source Institut Claudius Regaud
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

The effectiveness of the analgesic and anti-nausea prevention techniques of the investigators justifies being evaluated regularly in order to adapt the management strategy to the specificities of each surgical act.

A first evaluation took place in June 2016 and allowed to identify a category of patients (partial breast surgery with or without axillary gesture) not benefiting from an ideal algological management because justifying in 30% of the cases of a level 3 analgesic remedy in the postoperative recovery room. This use of morphine results in a significant incidence of postoperative nausea and prolonged recovery time before return home harmful to the patient.

With their experience in locoregional anesthesia technique in complete breast surgery (total mastectomy) and aware of the effectiveness of this type of anesthesia on the management of immediate and chronic pain, the investigators have extended their indications of ALR to partial breast surgery in ambulatory.


Description:

During the anesthesia consultation, the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is evaluated by the Apfel score (Apfel CC, Anesthesiology 1999) and a preventive strategy correlated to this score is then determined. An order including anti-emetics and analgesics is given to the patient for the return home after the outpatient surgery.

On the day of the outpatient surgery, patients receive in the operating room the prevention of PONV according to their level of risk (according to the recommendations of the Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation - SFAR 2008 and Guidelines 2014) and analgesics including a level II and NSAIDs (in the absence of contraindication).

All patients underwent general anaesthesia with sufentanil and propofol. Mechanical ventilation was performed with laryngeal mask. A echoguided regional anesthesia was performed by injection of 20 ml of ropivacaine 3.75 mg/ml above and under the serratus muscle as described by Blanco and al (ref 3)" In the postoperative recovery room, PONV is treated if necessary by an anti-emetic class different from those used in the block. In postoperative pain with EVA> 3, morphine titration is performed as recommended.

Patients are then monitored in an outpatient surgery unit until they have a home-based return capability assessed by the CHUNG score, including the level of pain (moderate and well relieved), the absence of persistent nausea, and the ability to ambulation.

All outpatient surgery patients are called the day after their return home to ensure the absence of complications according to the regulatory procedure related to outpatient anesthesia.

As part of this evaluation, information on the level of pain at rest and mobility, as well as the frequency of PONV are also recorded and this follow-up is repeated in D2 and D3 after the intervention.

This information is then correlated with the type of anesthesia performed, the surgical procedure as well as the analgesic strategy (ALR) and the antinausea strategy performed.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date June 30, 2018
Est. primary completion date June 30, 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- patients admitted for ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia

- patients admitted during the period from 01 to 30 June 2016 or during the period from 18 to 5 July 2018

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patient neither French nor English,

- Patient refusing to participate in this study

- Minor patients were excluded to ensure the homogeneity of the surveyed population (satisfaction of minors not meeting the same characteristics as that of adults)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
locoregional anesthesia
Both groups received locoregional anesthesias

Locations

Country Name City State
France Institut Claudius Regaud Toulouse Occitanie

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Institut Claudius Regaud

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

References & Publications (5)

Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29. — View Citation

Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lantéri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous — View Citation

Fuzier R, Puel F, Izard P, Sommet A, Pierre S. Prospective cohort study assessing chronic pain in patients following minor surgery for breast cancer. J Anesth. 2017 Apr;31(2):246-254. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2288-9. Epub 2016 Nov 24. — View Citation

Gärtner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568. Erratum in: JAMA. 2012 Nov 21;308(19) — View Citation

Kumar SP. Utilization of brief pain inventory as an assessment tool for pain in patients with cancer: a focused review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 May;17(2):108-15. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.84531. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Evaluation of pain after surgery by Simple Verbal Evaluation Pain level in post-operative room measured by Simple Verbal Evaluation. The simple verbal scale or Keele scale has 5 qualifiers to describe the intensity of the pain, each descriptor is associated with a numerical value. 0 = no pain, 1 = poor, 2 = moderate, 3 = intense, 4 = atrocious.
The goal of management is to achieve pain values below 3 (low to moderate).
1 day (the day of the surgery)
Secondary Incidence of postopérative nausea and vomiting after prevention strategy guided by Apfel score risk The risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is evaluated by the Apfel score and a preventive strategy correlated to this score is then determined. An order including anti-emetics and analgesics is given to the patient for the return home after the outpatient surgery. The Apfel score includes four variables (Female sex, History of motion sickness or postoperative nausea and vomiting, Nonsmoker, Postoperative opioid treatment is planned) and assigns one point for each. 1 day before surgery
Secondary Medical procedure characteristics The type of anesthesia performed, the surgical procedure as well as the analgesic strategy (ALR) and the antinausea strategy performed. 1 day (the day of the surgery)
Secondary Evaluation of pain after surgery by Opioid requirements Pain level in post-operative room measured and opioid requirement if important pain persists. The scale used is the "visual analogue scale ". If EVA> 3 titration with morphine 1 mg per 1 mg is performed in the recovery room until an EVA <3 is obtained. The dose of morphine in mg necessary to achieve this objective is collected. 3 days (from surgery to 3 days after)
Secondary Evaluation of home-based return capability by CHUNG score Patients are then monitored in an outpatient surgery unit until they have a home-based return capability assessed by the CHUNG score, including the level of pain (moderate and well relieved), the absence of persistent nausea, and the ability to ambulation.Points are assigned to six variables : level of consciousness, physical activity, hemodynamic stability, oxygen saturation, pain, emetic symptoms. A score of 9 or 10 is needed to allow the patient to leave the hospital. 1 day (just after the surgery)
Secondary Evaluation of pain at home after surgery at mobility by EVA during the first 3 days Pain level (Analogic Visual Evaluation EVA) on the first 3 days after surgery at mobility. The EVA is a numeric scale of pain. The patient must estimate his pain level from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the most unsustainable pain ever experienced). The question asked by phone is "between 0 no pain and 10 excruciating pain, where would you place your pain on this scale?" This scale is validated by the entire scientific community as the most sensitive and above all the most reproducible and can be obtained by phone.
an acceptable pain is <3 therefore mild to moderate.
3 days (from surgery to 3 days after)
Secondary Evaluation of pain at home after surgery at rest by EVA during the first 3 days Pain level (Analogic Visual Evaluation EVA) on the first 3 days after surgery, at rest. The EVA is a numeric scale of pain. The patient must estimate his pain level from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the most unsustainable pain ever experienced). The question asked by phone is "between 0 no pain and 10 excruciating pain, where would you place your pain on this scale?" This scale is validated by the entire scientific community as the most sensitive and above all the most reproducible and can be obtained by phone.
an acceptable pain is <3 therefore mild to moderate.
3 days (from surgery to 3 days after)
Secondary Evaluation of sleep quality Sleep quality (wake up by pain or not during the night) during the 3 days after surgery. Patient is asked to answer yes or not to the question : Have you been awakened by pain during the night" during first 3 days 3 days (from surgery to 3 days after)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05346796 - Survivorship Plan HEalth REcord (SPHERE) Implementation Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05094804 - A Study of OR2805, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting CD163, Alone and in Combination With Anticancer Agents Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT04867850 - Effect of Behavioral Nudges on Serious Illness Conversation Documentation N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04086251 - Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring in Oncology Patients N/A
Completed NCT01285037 - A Study of LY2801653 in Advanced Cancer Phase 1
Completed NCT00680992 - Study of Denosumab in Subjects With Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Phase 2
Completed NCT00062842 - Study of Irinotecan on a Weekly Schedule in Children Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT04548063 - Consent Forms in Cancer Research: Examining the Effect of Length on Readability N/A
Completed NCT04337203 - Shared Healthcare Actions and Reflections Electronic Systems in Survivorship N/A
Recruiting NCT04349293 - Ex-vivo Evaluation of the Reactivity of the Immune Infiltrate of Cancers to Treatments With Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting the Immunomodulatory Pathways N/A
Terminated NCT02866851 - Feasibility Study of Monitoring by Web-application on Cytopenia Related to Chemotherapy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05304988 - Development and Validation of the EFT for Adolescents With Cancer
Completed NCT04448041 - CRANE Feasibility Study: Nutritional Intervention for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Completed NCT00340522 - Childhood Cancer and Plexiform Neurofibroma Tissue Microarray for Molecular Target Screening and Clinical Drug Development
Recruiting NCT04843891 - Evaluation of PET Probe [64]Cu-Macrin in Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer and Sarcoidosis. Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT03844048 - An Extension Study of Venetoclax for Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Venetoclax Clinical Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT03109041 - Initial Feasibility Study to Treat Resectable Pancreatic Cancer With a Planar LDR Source Phase 1
Completed NCT03167372 - Pilot Comparison of N-of-1 Trials of Light Therapy N/A
Terminated NCT01441115 - ECI301 and Radiation for Advanced or Metastatic Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06206785 - Resting Energy Expenditure in Palliative Cancer Patients