Study of Debio 0932 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours or Lymphoma

Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:

Phase I Dose-escalation, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Debio 0932, a Novel Hsp90-inhibitor, Administered Orally, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours or Lymphoma

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01168752
• Other study ID #: Debio 0932-101
• Secondary ID: 2009-017720-11
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 1
• First received: July 22, 2010
• Last updated: January 31, 2014
• Start date: April 2010
• Est. completion date: April 2013

Study information

• Verified date: January 2014
• Source: Debiopharm International SA
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis)
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of Debio 0932 when administered orally, every-other-day or daily during the first 30 days, in patients with solid tumours or lymphoma.

Description:

This is an open-label, non-randomised, dose-escalation phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study in patients with advanced and/or refractory malignancies (solid tumours or lymphoma), to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of Debio 0932 administered orally every-other-day (schedule A) or every day (schedule B) and to assess its safety profile, pharmakokinetic, antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic biomarkers.

Increments used in dose escalation will be determined according to the maximum grade of treatment-related adverse events observed during the first 30-day treatment period of each schedule in the previous in the preceding dose level Once reaching the recommended dose (RD) for each schedule, up to 40 additional patients will be enrolled and treated at the RD of the retained schedule, as part of an expansion phase.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 81
• Est. completion date: April 2013
• Est. primary completion date: April 2013
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced solid tumours or lymphoma, except for primitive hepatocarcinoma for which radiological diagnosis only is permitted;

• Advanced or metastatic disease refractory to standard curative or palliative therapy or contraindication or have refused standard therapy,

• Measurable and/or evaluable disease,

• Age = 18 years,

• ECOG performance = 1

• Life expectancy = 3 months,

• If female, neither pregnant or lactating,

• Negative pregnancy test for females at screening, preferably done within 1 week before Day 1 of treatment (not applicable to patients with bilateral oophorectomy and/or hysterectomy),

• Agreeing to use appropriate medically approved contraception (physical barrier contraception is recommended) from study entry to 6 months after the last day of treatment for the patient,

• Absolute neutrophil count = 1,500/µL; platelets = 100,000/µL; calculated creatinine clearance = 60mL/min (calculated according to the formula of Cockroft and Gault); total bilirubin = 1.5x ULN; AST/ALT = 2.5x ULN. In patients with documented liver metastases, the AST/ALT may be = 3.5x ULN; prothrombin time =1.5x ULN, kalemia, magnesemia and phosphatemia > LLN (Lower Limit of Normal)

• Able to render informed consent and to follow protocol requirements,

• Able to swallow capsules,

• Able to comply with scheduled plans, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Received investigational agents or systemic anti-cancer agents within 14 days of Day 1 of treatment, or 28 days for those agents with unknown elimination half-lives, or known elimination half-lives greater than 50 hours; or 6 weeks for Mitomycine C or for nitrosourea agents,

• Unresolved toxicity from previous treatment or previous investigational agents,

• Patients with history of prior radiation that potentially included the heart in the field (e.g. mantle),

• Cardiac exclusion criteria:

• History of significant coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure that meets NYHA class III or IV, within 12 months (see Appendix D),

• Significant cardiovascular dysfunction : pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular systolic dysfunction, aortic stenosis, mitral insufficiency > grade 2 and/or Left Ventricular Ejection fraction < 45% or < 55% if prior exposure to anthracyclines, based on MUGA or echocardiography,

• Uncontrolled hypertension (Systolic > 150 or diastolic >100),

• Permanent and uncontrolled cardiac rhythm disorders and clinical relevant abnormalities in 12-lead ECG/Holter, such as WPW (Wolff-Parkinson-White) syndrome, QRS > 120 msec, PR > 220 msec, heart rate < 50 bpm, Q wave, ST deviation, left bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation, flutter, tachysystoly.

• Prolonged QTc interval > 450 msec in men and > 470 msec in women using Fridericia formula,

• Congenital long QT syndrome,

• Use of any medication associated with known QTc interval prolongation (a non-exhaustive list will be provided separately)

• Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B or hepatitis C,

• Patients with uncontrolled brain metastases,

• Gastrointestinal diseases or disorders that could affect drug absorption such as diarrhoea, major abdominal surgery, significant bowel obstruction and/or gastrointestinal diseases that could alter the assessment of safety, including any of the following:

• Irritable bowel syndrome

• Ulcerative colitis

• Crohn disease

• Haemorrhagic coloproctitis

• Concurrent participation with any other anticancer therapy.

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cancer
• Lymphoma
• Neoplasms
• Solid Tumors

Intervention

Drug:
• Debio 0932
Gelatin capsules of 2 dosage strengths (25 mg or 100 mg) The maximum dose will depend on the number of dose levels necessary to determine the MTD. In both schedules the study treatment will be continued, until one of the study treatment discontinuation criteria is met.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Centre Georges-François Leclerc	Dijon
France	Institut Claudius Regaud	Toulouse
France	Institut Gustave Roussy	Villejuif

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Debiopharm International SA

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

References & Publications (16)

Abramson JS, Chen W, Juszczynski P, Takahashi H, Neuberg D, Kutok JL, Takeyama K, Shipp MA. The heat shock protein 90 inhibitor IPI-504 induces apoptosis of AKT-dependent diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Br J Haematol. 2009 Feb;144(3):358-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07484.x. Epub 2008 Nov 13. — View Citation

Banerji U, Judson I, Workman P. The clinical applications of heat shock protein inhibitors in cancer - present and future. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2003 Oct;3(5):385-90. Review. — View Citation

Böll B, Eltaib F, Reiners KS, von Tresckow B, Tawadros S, Simhadri VR, Burrows FJ, Lundgren K, Hansen HP, Engert A, von Strandmann EP. Heat shock protein 90 inhibitor BIIB021 (CNF2024) depletes NF-kappaB and sensitizes Hodgkin's lymphoma cells for natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Aug 15;15(16):5108-16. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0213. Epub 2009 Aug 11. — View Citation

Chandarlapaty S, Sawai A, Ye Q, Scott A, Silinski M, Huang K, Fadden P, Partdrige J, Hall S, Steed P, Norton L, Rosen N, Solit DB. SNX2112, a synthetic heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, has potent antitumor activity against HER kinase-dependent cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jan 1;14(1):240-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1667. — View Citation

Chiosis G, Lucas B, Huezo H, Solit D, Basso A, Rosen N. Development of purine-scaffold small molecule inhibitors of Hsp90. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2003 Oct;3(5):371-6. Review. — View Citation

Chiosis G, Vilenchik M, Kim J, Solit D. Hsp90: the vulnerable chaperone. Drug Discov Today. 2004 Oct 15;9(20):881-8. Review. — View Citation

Croce CM. Oncogenes and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 31;358(5):502-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072367. Review. — View Citation

Eccles SA, Massey A, Raynaud FI, Sharp SY, Box G, Valenti M, Patterson L, de Haven Brandon A, Gowan S, Boxall F, Aherne W, Rowlands M, Hayes A, Martins V, Urban F, Boxall K, Prodromou C, Pearl L, James K, Matthews TP, Cheung KM, Kalusa A, Jones K, McDonald E, Barril X, Brough PA, Cansfield JE, Dymock B, Drysdale MJ, Finch H, Howes R, Hubbard RE, Surgenor A, Webb P, Wood M, Wright L, Workman P. NVP-AUY922: a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor active against xenograft tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2008 Apr 15;68(8):2850-60. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5256. — View Citation

Hauschke D, Steinijans VW, Diletti E. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1990 Feb;28(2):72-8. — View Citation

Kamal A, Boehm MF, Burrows FJ. Therapeutic and diagnostic implications of Hsp90 activation. Trends Mol Med. 2004 Jun;10(6):283-90. Review. — View Citation

Maloney A, Workman P. HSP90 as a new therapeutic target for cancer therapy: the story unfolds. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2002 Jan;2(1):3-24. Review. — View Citation

Mosser DD, Morimoto RI. Molecular chaperones and the stress of oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2004 Apr 12;23(16):2907-18. — View Citation

Obermann WM, Sondermann H, Russo AA, Pavletich NP, Hartl FU. In vivo function of Hsp90 is dependent on ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis. J Cell Biol. 1998 Nov 16;143(4):901-10. — View Citation

Powers MV, Workman P. Targeting of multiple signalling pathways by heat shock protein 90 molecular chaperone inhibitors. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006 Dec;13 Suppl 1:S125-35. Review. — View Citation

Vilenchik M, Solit D, Basso A, Huezo H, Lucas B, He H, Rosen N, Spampinato C, Modrich P, Chiosis G. Targeting wide-range oncogenic transformation via PU24FCl, a specific inhibitor of tumor Hsp90. Chem Biol. 2004 Jun;11(6):787-97. — View Citation

Workman P, Burrows F, Neckers L, Rosen N. Drugging the cancer chaperone HSP90: combinatorial therapeutic exploitation of oncogene addiction and tumor stress. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Oct;1113:202-16. Epub 2007 May 18. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Occurence of DLTs for both schedules	Occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) for both schedule A and schedule B	30 days	Yes
Secondary	Incidence of AEs, change in safety and efficacy parameters	Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), laboratory abnormalities, treatment discontinuations due to AEs for both schedules and expansion phase, change in 12-lead ECG (RR, PR, QRS, QT and QTcF intervals), rate of confirmed response, duration of response and disease control, pharmacodynamic biomarkers and drug pharmacokinetic parameters.	Duration of study	Yes

External Links

•   Study Sponsor