View clinical trials related to Cancer Colorectal.
Filter by:The goal of this randomized trial is to test the effect of a reminder telephone call in the official native language in the country where the invitee is born, in addition to the reminder letter in Norwegian on participation in the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Pakistani and Somalian immigrants, compared to the reminder letter in Norwegian only. The main question it aims to answer is: •Does a reminder telephone call in the language of origin increase participation in colorectal cancer screening in Pakistani and Somalian immigrants in Norway? Participants in this trial are individuals with Pakistan or Somalia as their country of birth invited to the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, who have not participated by mailing a faecal sample to the screening laboratory. In the intervention group, the participants will be called in the official language in their country of origin, to inform about colorectal cancer screening, in addition to the reminder letter in Norwegian language sent to all non-participants. Participants in the comparison group will only be sent the reminder letter in Norwegian language. The researchers will compare differences in the participation rate in the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program between the intervention and comparison groups.
This clinical trial compares two different prehabilitation programs, with no organized prehabilitation, prior to major colorectal cancer surgery. The prehabilitation programs include intensive and coached physical exercise and optimized nutritional intake coupled with smoking cessation, physiological support and correction of poly-pharmacy.
Complete and timely colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening test results in early detection, cancer prevention, and reduction in mortality, but follow-up in safety-net health systems occurs in less than 50% at 6 months. The proposal will implement multi-level approach consisting of a stepped-wedge clinic-level intervention of team-based best practices co-developed with primary and specialty care, a patient-level technology intervention to provide enhanced instructions and navigation to complete diagnostic colonoscopy, and a mixed methods evaluation to explore multi-level factors contributing to intervention outcomes. Developing a solution to this high-risk and diverse population has the potential to translate to other health systems, support patient self-management, and address other patient conditions.
Financial distress affects 30-70% of cancer patients and describes the burden that patients experience due to the costs of care (CoC). One reason may be because patients lack the appropriate information on CoC that would help them better plan for and manage their CoC. Therefore, the investigators plan to test a Proactive CoC intervention which includes a discussion with a trained educator on CoC information and a Cost Tracking tool to help patients deal with their CoC.
The primary objective of this phase I study is to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CBP-1019, a bi-specific ligand conjugated drugs in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Over the past decade, changes in knowledge and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine have been occurring. One study shows that 21% of patients are turning to them. In contrast, hypnosis is among the least used. While perceptions of alternative medicine are improving, there is still widespread skepticism about the beliefs of hypnosis and this may explain why patients are not turning to it. Although its use in oncology is no longer in question, and its efficacy in the management of side effects has been demonstrated, no recent qualitative study has been conducted to examine the representations of hypnosis among cancer patients. It therefore seems relevant to us today to know the evolution of the representations and attitudes of cancer patients towards hypnosis.
The goal of this observational study is to compare anesthetic modalities (intravenous propofol anesthesia with sevoflurane gas anesthesia) in patients who underwent colorectal cancer resection surgery regarding the outcome of acute kidney injury. The main questions it aims to answer are: - is there a difference in acute kidney injury incidence in the two anesthetic modalities? - is there a difference in plasma creatinine between the two anesthetic modalities? - are there any patient characteristics or intraoperative factors that effect the incidence of acute kidney injury in either anesthetic modality? The study will analyze data from the CAN clinical trial database. (Cancer and Anesthesia: Survival After Radical Surgery - a Comparison Between Propofol or Sevoflurane Anesthesia, NCT01975064)
Up to 25% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are diagnosed with liver metastases, which is the most common site of metastasis, already during the primary tumor diagnosis. Another 30% of the patients will develop liver metastases at a later stage. Even though patient can be treated by surgical resection of the metastatic tumor, 50-75% of the patients experience a relapse in less than two years. Due to the high probability of relapse, mCRC patients undergo multiple rounds of surgery and adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy/radiotherapy) which results in substantial physical de-conditioning. Physical activity has been shown to increase the progression-free survival rates in mCRC patients, when applied post-diagnosis. Increased cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) at the time of diagnosis among CRC individuals has been associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality. Although data on the effect of chronic exercise on VO2peak have emerged, thus far, there is no randomized clinical trial that has investigated the effects of exercise training in mCRC patients early after surgical treatment with curative intent. Therefore, this project aims to address the beneficial effect of structured exercise training primarily on VO2peak and tumor recurrence in mCRC patients immediately after surgical treatment and while they are undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy. A total of 66 participants will be recruited from the Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet and randomly allocated to a standard care control group (n=22), standard care plus 150 min/week exercise training (n=22) or standard care plus 300 min/week exercise training (n=22). Participants will undergo exercise training for 6 months, starting immediately after surgery, and they will be followed for additional 6 months. Tumor recurrence will be evaluated up to 3 years after training initiation.
Multicenter, inter-regional, case-control study with the primary objective of evaluating the discriminative power of the blood biomarker TFPI-1 to separate patients with histologically proven CRC from an asymptomatic control population between 50 and 75 years of age with normal colonoscopy.
Studies evaluating decisions aids have used a wide range of outcome measures as well as formats and settings. Most studies have focused on patient decision aids used either within the consultation or delivered pre-consultation, but there are no randomised, controlled studies comparing the two. However, timing and format of the patient decision aid intervention may affect how useful the tool is to the patient. The aim of this project is therefore to deepen our understanding of the patient's engagement in and preparation for the decision making process in a randomised, controlled trial comparing an electronic pre-consultation and paper-based in-consultation patient decision aid. 274 patients with colorectal and breast cancer are enrolled in the study. Data are collected at both patient and consultant perceived levels as well as an observed level of shared decision making.