There are more than 498,563 clinical trials published worldwide with over 60,000 trials that are currently either recruiting or not yet recruiting. Use our filters on this page to find more information on current clinical trials or past clinical trials (free or paid) for study purposes and read about their results.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare and potentially life-threatening progressive disease that evolves from unresolved pulmonary embolism. Gold standard treatment for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) performed by skilled cardio-thoracic surgeons. Some patients may not be surgical candidates due to co-morbidities or because the vascular lesions are too distal making them technically inoperable. In these patients, balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as an effective treatment. In a subgroup of patients, the distribution of vascular lesions makes it possible to perform either BPA or PEA. There has never been a head-to head comparison of BPA with PEA. The aim of this study is therefore, to evaluate if BPA is non-inferior to PEA in patients with (CTEPH) who are eligible for both treatments.
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a light electrical stimulation to leg muscles and joints can help people with Cerebral Palsy (CP) maintain balance during everyday tasks such as getting up from a chair and walking. Children and young adults with CP can have trouble with daily tasks such as standing up, sitting down on the chair and turning. The difficulty in maintaining balance sometimes lead to falls. This raises risk of disability in CP as children age into teens and adults. Current treatments are not very effective. In this study, children and young adults will be asked to stand up from a stool, walk in a straight line, turn, walk back and sit down on the stool. Participants will receive electrical stimulation at a very low intensity that cannot be felt to help increase their sensory perception. The investigators will evaluate treatment by testing balance, and other functional measures.
Prismocitrate 18 is a continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) solution to be used as a renal replacement solution and as an anticoagulant to prevent blood clotting in the extracorporeal circuit. The objectives of this study are: 1) to confirm the safety of Prismocitrate 18 in patients receiving CRRT using continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) or continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and 2) to observe that the PrisMax System allows for implementation of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) (citrate and calcium dosing) during CRRT with Prismocitrate 18 and intended prescription. The study period of the patient's CRRT will be up to 10 days.
Exercise has many well-documented effects in the prevention or treatment of disease, but recently some studies have raised awareness of the possible negative effects of too much exercise. In former elite endurance athletes, an increased risk of cardiac fibrosis and arrhythmias have been described. Whether exercise itself is the culprit remains to be explored. The right cardiac ventricle can be overloaded during long-term intense exercise, due to increased volume load and possibly an increased afterload. In a subgroub of athletes the appearance with morphological and functional changes resembling an ARVC like phenotype. Furthermore, atrial fibrillation among male middle-aged athletes is up to 5 times more common compared to age-matched non-athletes. The working hypothesis of this study is that male athletes remodel more than females and that some of thise changes are already measureable early after end of elite sporting carreer. In this prospective cohort study, of 50 elite athletes at retirement, after 3 months and thereafter yearly for five years, to determine the characteristics of remodeling of the heart focusing on the left atrial and right ventricle.
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) leads the global mortality statistics. Atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries hallmark IHD, drive hypoxia, and may rupture to result in myocardial infarction (MI) and death of contractile cardiac muscle, which is eventually replaced by a scar. Depending on the extent of the damage, dysbalanced cardiac workload often leads to emergence of heart failure (HF). The atrial appendages, enriched with active endocrine and paracrine cardiac cells, has been characterized to contain cells promising in stimulating cardiac regenerative healing. In this AAMS2 randomized controlled and double-blinded trial, the patient's own tissue from the right atrial appendage (RAA) is for therapy. A piece from the RAA can be safely harvested upon the set-up of the heart and lung machine at the beginning of coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery. In the AAMS2 trial, a piece of the RAA tissue is processed and utilized as epicardially transplanted atrial appendage micrografts (AAMs) for CABG-support therapy. In our preclinical evaluation, epicardial AAMs transplantation after MI attenuated scarring and improved cardiac function. Proteomics suggested an AAMs-induced glycolytic metabolism, a process associated with an increased regenerative capacity of myocardium. Recently, the safety and feasibility of AAMs therapy was demonstrated in an open-label clinical study. Moreover, as this study suggested increased thickness of the viable myocardium in the scarred area, it also provided the first indication of therapeutic benefit. Based on randomization with estimated enrolment of a total of 50 patients with 1:1 group allocation ratio, the piece of RAA tissue is either perioperatively processed to AAMs or cryostored. The AAMs, embedded in a fibrin matrix gel, are placed on a collaged-based matrix sheet, which is then epicardially sutured in place at the end of CABG surgery. The location is determined by preoperative late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI) to pinpoint the ischemic scar. The controls receive the collagen-based patch, but without the AAMs. Study blood samples, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and LGE-CMRI are performed before and at 6-month follow-up after the surgery. The trial's primary endpoints focus on changes in cardiac fibrosis as evaluated by LGE-CMRI and circulating levels of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Secondary endpoints center on other efficacy parameters, as well as both safety and feasibility of the therapy.
In summary, there is a compelling rationale for investigating venetoclax as an intervention to sensitise virus-expressing cells to apoptosis and thereby reduce the size of the latent HIV reservoir. While this concept may ultimately need to be tested in the setting of concomitant latency reversal, the investigators propose to initially establish the safety of venetoclax in PLWH on ART. The investigators will use this study to also investigate effects of venetoclax monotherapy on proapoptotic pathways, immune effector function and HIV persistence in PLWH on ART and through these studies establish the rationale for subsequent studies testing venetoclax in combination with an LRA.
This clinical trial tests how well providing education improves screening for lung cancer in patients with a history of smoking. Screenings may help doctors find lung cancer sooner when it may be easier to treat. Education and counseling may be an effective method to help providers and patients learn about lung cancer screening. Providing education and decision counseling to providers and patients may increase lung cancer screening.
TRIGGER 1 is a previous study that evaluate the immunological risk of pregnancy in women with lung transplants in France, whose pregnancy has ended between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2021. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of humoral rejection with a year after pregnancy. TRIGGER 2 aims to evaluate the risk of humoral rejection if there are common antigens between the child and the lung donor. We will collect HLA typing from children to compare them to the HLA typing of the mother, the lung donor and the antibodies produced if there are. Thus, it will help us to suggest recommendations to limit the immunological risk of pregnancy for lung transplant women. Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice of terminal chronic respiratory failure, such as cystic fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Young female patient of childbearing age are concerned. For many years, given the risk of maternal and fetal complications, pregnancies were not recommended. Studies on large cohorts of transplanted patients, particularly kidney transplanted patients, have made it possible to study the risks of maternal, obstetrical and neonatal complications. A few studies have been published in lung transplantation on small numbers of patients. However, these publications reporting on the fate of pregnancies in cohorts of lung transplant patients do not mentioned the immunological risk, with in particular the absence of studies on the risk of humoral rejection, appearance of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigens) antibodies (Ac) and the possible appearance of anti-HLA Ac directed against the donor (donor specific antibody, DSA). TRIGGER 1 is a previous study, whose main objective is to evaluate the immunological risk of pregnancy in women with lung transplants (mono-, bi-, or cardiopulmonary) in France, whose pregnancy has ended between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2021. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of humoral rejection within 1 year after pregnancy. For this study TRIGGER2, we will collect the HLA typing of the children for pregnancies that resulted in the birth of a child. Thus, we will be able to compare the HLA typing of the children with the HLA typings of the mother and the lung donor, and the antibodies produced by the mother. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the risk of humoral rejection if there are common HLA antigens between the child and the lung donor.
This trial is a multicenter, open-label, non-comparative, phase II, biomarker-driven adjuvant treatment study involving the periodic collection and analysis of blood samples from patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative early-stage BC at higher risk of relapse, who have undergone surgery within the previous five years, with no evidence of locoregional, contralateral, or distant disease. The study design is composed by an initial pre-screening phase, a molecular follow-up phase (ctDNA surveillance phase), and an interventional therapeutic phase (treatment phase). After informed consent is obtained, a total of1,260 eligible patients will enter a ctDNA surveillance in which primary tumor tissue and matched normal blood will be collected from each patient to obtain a patient-specific somatic mutations panel (tumor signature). At the event of ctDNA positivity, patients will be screened to enter the treatment phase of the study. Upon confirmed eligibility, a total of 40 patients will be allocated in one of the following trial's arms adopting a sequential recruitment strategy: Arm A: Control Arm (N=10) Arm B: Experimental Arm with giredestrant (N=10) Arm C: Experimental Arm with giredestrant + abemaciclib (N=10) Arm D: Experimental Arm with giredestrant + inavolisib (N=10) If the strategy of ctDNA monitoring enables physicians to identify patients at high risk of relapse and assess whether treatment at molecular relapse can improve outcome, new cohorts may be added to the study.
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the feasibility of pharmacokinetically boosting osimertinib using cobicistat in order to improve osimertinib exposure in individual patients with advanced NSCLC (Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer) with mutated EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Cohort 1: Does concurrent use of osimertinib and cobicistat allow for osimertinib weekly intake reductions? If so, how much can the intake be reduced while retaining clinically effective exposure? - Cohort 2: Does concurrent use of osimertinib and cobicistat allow for improved penetration of osimertinib in the central nervous system, in patients with CNS (central nervous system) oligoprogression? Participants who are taking osimertinib in regular care will receive cobicistat in addition to their other medication. They will undergo blood sampling to measure the amount of osimertinib in blood, and measure the effect of boosting. Additionally, in cohort 1 patients will be dose-reduced if their exposure levels allow.