View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is an open-label, Phase 2 study to evaluate preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of BDC-1001 administered as a single agent and in combination with pertuzumab in subjects with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu®).
A Single-Center Retrospective Study About Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin-Based Regimen in the Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Comparison With Other Chemotherapy Regimen
Financial distress affects 30-70% of cancer patients and describes the burden that patients experience due to the costs of care (CoC). One reason may be because patients lack the appropriate information on CoC that would help them better plan for and manage their CoC. Therefore, the investigators plan to test a Proactive CoC intervention which includes a discussion with a trained educator on CoC information and a Cost Tracking tool to help patients deal with their CoC.
The purpose of this study is to understand the safety and effects of the study medicine ARV-471 (PF-07850327) given together with palbociclib in advanced breast cancer. In particular, the study will compare the combination of ARV-471 plus palbociclib to standard of care therapy (letrozole plus palbociclib). Both letrozole and palbociclib are medicines already used for treatment of breast cancer. ARV-471 is a new medicine under study. This study is seeking participants who have breast cancer that: - Have a locally advanced or metastatic disease and cannot be fully cured by surgery or radiation therapy. A metastatic disease is when disease has spread to other parts of the body. - Is sensitive to hormonal therapy such as tamoxifen. This is called estrogen receptor positive disease. - Have not received any prior medicine for advanced disease. Example medications include tamoxifen or letrozole or exemestane. The study will have an open-label SLI (study lead-in) before initiation of Phase 3 trial. During SLI, two dose levels of palbociclib in combination with ARV-471 will be explored in parallel. Assignment to the palbociclib dose is by chance. Half of the participant will receive one dose and the other half another palbociclib dose. The purpose of SLI is to determine the recommended Phase 3 dose of palbociclib to be administered in combination with ARV-471. In the Phase 3, half of the participants will take ARV-471 plus palbociclib while the other half will take letrozole plus palbociclib. In both SLI and Phase 3, participants will take the study medicines by mouth, with food, once a day. Participants will take the study medicines until breast cancer increase in size or side effects become too severe. Side effects refer to unwanted reactions to medications. Participants will visit the study clinic about once every 4 weeks.
The goal of this interventional study is to analyze the impact of a supervised oncological exercise intervention in surviving breast cancer patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Evaluate the efectivity of a supervised individualized and adapted oncological physical exercise program in the cardiovascular fitness of the participants. - Analyze the impact of this intervention in the body composition, functionality and quality of life of the parcitipants Participants will perform a controlled and adapted program, supervised by an especialized professional during 16 weeks. Researchers will compare this intervention group, where the supervised program will take place, with a control group, where the patients will perform regular physical activity (non-supervised) to see the changes in the efectivity and impact in cardiovascular fitness, body composition and quality of life.
This will be a Phase 2 clinical trial to assess somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in Stage IV estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer using Gallium-68 DOTATATE or Copper-64 DOTATATE PET/CT.
The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer (BC) can drastically affect the quality of life of patients with this disease by causing symptoms of vasomotor disorders, insomnia, depression and anxiety. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is a program dedicated to fostering complete awareness in the present in order to accept the moment, thereby reducing stress. Previous studies have shown that MBSR benefits patients with chronic conditions such as mood disorders and chronic pain, as well as patients with BC. However, its usefulness in Mexican patients has not been previously studied.
GIM22-ERICA is a clinical trial investigating the efficacy of two different strategies in HER2 negative MBC treatment. The study will include MBC patients with histologically documented HER2 negative disease, who have progressed to one prior regimen for metastatic disease and are eligible for a second-line chemotherapy with either eribulin or capecitabine. This study design should answer to different questions: - What is the correct placement of Eribulin in the context of a long term treatment strategy? - Is an early use of Eribulin the best approach for MBC pts treatment? - May early use of Eribulin impact on subsequent treatment outcomes? The correlated biomarkers analysis, evaluating angiogenic, epithelial and mesenchymal markers should confirm the results observed in preclinical studies ad support the clinical findings. Liquid biopsies and ctDNA evaluation could help to monitor the course of the disease and to identify novel biomarkers of drug resistance.
This is a phaseⅠb/Ⅱ, open-label, two-arm parallel study evaluating the efficacy and safety of different targeted antibody-drug conjugates for HER2 ultra-low or no expression advanced breast cancer
The management of patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) with axillary nodal involvement is still a controversial topic. These patients' treatment usually involves the administration of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in order to improve survival rates and increase local disease control. Depending on the tumor subtype, an axillary pathologic complete response (pCR) is achieved in 40-70% of initially axillary node-positive patients (cN+). Concerning patients with an axillary pCR, thus a clinically negative node status (cN0), axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) might be replaced by less invasive surgical approaches and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered, in these cases, an effective alternative treatment. However, the relatively high false negative rates, reported in several validation trials, points out the complexity concerning these patients' treatment. Moreover, histological findings' predictive and prognostic value, after SLNB, of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITCs) is still unclear. Currently, dual-tracer-guided lymph node biopsy and the surgical removal of ≥ 3 sentinel lymph nodes are known as effective strategies aimed to reduce the false negative rates. There are several ongoing clinical trials to understand and define the best approach for these patients. Nowadays, there's great interest in potential prognostic role of systemic inflammation's biochemical markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Systemic inflammation's markers may be nodal pCR's predictors after NAC in node-positive breast cancer patients. The aim of the study is to develop and validate a pre-operative model, able to predict pCR after NAC to select the patients suitable for a surgery de-escalation strategy.