Breast Cancer Screening for Underserved Women: Comparing Outcomes and Lowering Recall Rates With 3D- vs. 2D-mammography

Breast Cancer Screening Clinical Trial

Official title:

Breast Cancer Screening Among Medically Underserved Women in New Mexico: Comparing Outcomes and LOwering Recall Rates With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (3D Mammography) VErsus Full-field Digital (2D) Mammography. The LOVE New Mexico Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03979729
• Other study ID #: INST UNM 1525
• Status: Completed
• Start date: September 22, 2016
• Est. completion date: June 3, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: May 2021
• Source: New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Three-dimensional (3D) + two-dimensional (2D)- mammography may have particular value for minority, rural, and underserved women in New Mexico by decreasing recall rates and improving diagnostic sensitivity, thus alleviating some of the unique burdens associated with breast cancer screening in the multi-ethnic and underserved New Mexico patient population. Primary objective: To compare recall rates using 3D + 2D- vs. 2D- mammogram in New Mexico women undergoing screening mammogram between 2013 and 2016. Secondary objectives: Evaluate knowledge, attitudes, perceived barriers, intentions, decisional influences, and other psychosocial/cultural factors influencing breast cancer screening among medically underserved patients and assess what impact 3D + 2D-mammography might have on those perceptions; Determine primary care providers' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and preferences regarding 3D + 2D- vs. 2D- mammography; evaluate breast cancer detection rate and biopsy positive predictive value for screening mammograms using 3D + 2D- vs. 2D using PENRAD data; evaluate screening outcome, compliance with recall recommendations, breast cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, and demographics of interest in New Mexico women undergoing screening and offered 3-D mammography (retrospective chart review).

Description:

This project will have both a prospective and retrospective component. Retrospective component: Primary Objective: To compare recall rates using 3D + 2D- vs. 2D mammogram in New Mexico women undergoing screening mammograms between 2013 and 2016. Data abstraction from the PENRAD database will be completed by staff in the Department of Radiology. Data abstraction for the chart review of the subgroup of State-funded patients will be conducted with HIPAA-compliant practices from the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) electronic medical record. Data analysis will be performed by study investigators. Prospective component: Secondary Objective 1: To evaluate knowledge, attitudes, perceived barriers, intentions, and decisional influences (conflict, regret, satisfaction), and other psychosocial/cultural factors influencing breast cancer screening (including concerns over recall vs. radiation exposure) among medically underserved patients and to assess what impact 3D + 2D-mammography (with a potentially lower recall rate but higher radiation exposure) might have on those perceptions. Patients in Groups A and B will undergo 1:1 interviews. Patients in Group C will participate in a one-time focus group (6-8 women per group). Secondary Objective 2: To determine primary care providers' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and preferences regarding 3D + 2D vs. 2D- mammography. Providers will undergo interviews. Secondary Objective 3A: To evaluate breast cancer detection rate and biopsy positive predictive value in New Mexico women undergoing screening mammogram using 3D + 2D- vs. 2D- mammogram using PENRAD data collected from the group as a whole. This objective will be met via database query alone. No individual mammographic images will be evaluated. Secondary Objective 3B: To evaluate screening outcome, compliance with recall recommendations, breast cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, and demographics of interest in New Mexico women undergoing screening and offered 3-D mammography using retrospective chart review. Demographic variables will include age, self-reported ethnicity, city of residence, and health insurance type. This objective will be met via database query alone. No individual mammographic images will be evaluated.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 75
• Est. completion date: June 3, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: May 7, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 40 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria for Retrospective Component (Primary Objective):

• Screening mammographic examinations performed in women over age 40 undergoing 3D +2D- or 2D-screening mammogram through the University of New Mexico's Department of Radiology at the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) and Sandoval Regional Medical Center (SRMC) between 2013 and 2016 Inclusion Criteria for Prospective Component (Secondary Objective #1) (Patient Groups A and B)
• Women over age 40 undergoing screening mammogram through the University of New Mexico's Department of Radiology as recommended and ordered by their primary care provider
• Must have the ability to understand a consent form
• Enrolled or eligible for the Department of Health / State of New Mexico Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Program or Medicaid
• Must have been offered a choice of either 3D + 2D-mammography or 2D-mammography as screening for breast cancer and underwent the selected screening prior to consent
• Pregnant women may participate in this study Exclusion Criteria for Prospective Component (Secondary Objective #1) (Patient Groups A and

B):

• Cognitively impaired adult women are excluded from participation
• Adult women not able to consent for themselves are excluded from participation
• Prisoners may not participate in this study

Inclusion Criteria for Prospective Component (Secondary Objective #1) (Patient Group C):

• Women over age 40 recommended for mammographic screening for breast cancer by a primary care provider, but have never completed a screening mammogram
• Must have the ability to understand a consent form
• Enrolled or eligible for the Department of Health / State of New Mexico Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Program or for Medicaid
• Pregnant women may participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria for Prospective Component (Secondary Objective #1) (Patient Group C):

• Cognitively impaired adult women are excluded from participation
• Adult women not able to consent for themselves are excluded from participation
• Prisoners may not participate in this study

Inclusion Criteria for Providers (Secondary Objective #2):

• Primary care providers (physicians, physicians assistants, and advanced nurse practitioners) working in clinics providing primary care for underserved patient populations in New Mexico, including primary care providers at a RIOSNET-affiliated and UNM-affiliated clinics

Exclusion Criteria for Providers (Secondary Objective #2):

• Any primary care provider who does not order screening mammography for eligible participants or is under Medicaid violation review

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Breast Cancer Screening
• Breast Neoplasms

Intervention

Other:
• Routine Screening Mammogram (3D + 2D)
Subjects that have undergone a routine screening mammogram (3D + 2D) will be interviewed by a member of the research team who will ask a few questions to better understand how the subject made this decision and what things may have influenced her decision between different types of mammograms.
• Routine Screening Mammogram (2D)
Subjects that have undergone a routine screening mammogram (2D) will be interviewed by a member of the research team who will ask a few questions to better understand how the subject made this decision and what things may have influenced her decision between different types of mammograms.
• No Screening Mammogram
Subjects will participate in a one-time facilitated focus group.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center	Albuquerque	New Mexico

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Recall rates using 3D + 2D- vs. 2D-mammogram in New Mexico women undergoing screening mammograms (Retrospective analysis)	Compare the recall rates of New Mexico (NM) women over age 40 who underwent 3D + 2D screening mammograms vs. recall rates for women who underwent 2D- screening mammograms between 2013 and 2016 through the University of New Mexico's Department of Radiology at the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) and Sandoval Regional Medical Center (SRMC). The "recall rate" is defined as the percentage (number of patients recalled per 100 patients who had mammograms) of New Mexico women undergoing screening mammogram between 2013 and 2016 recalled for additional diagnostic imaging when screening mammogram was performed with digital breast tomosynthesis (3D + 2D-mammography) or 2- dimensional full-field digital mammography alone. The University of New Mexico's Department of Radiology PENRAD database will queried anonymously for this data.	5 years
Secondary	What psychosocial and cultural factors influence breast cancer screening among medically underserved patients, identified through interviews and questionnaires	Use interviews to create qualitative (descriptive) assessments of the knowledge, attitudes, perceived barriers, intentions, and decisional influences (conflict, regret, satisfaction), and other psychosocial/cultural factors influencing breast cancer screening (including concerns over recall vs. radiation exposure) among medically underserved patients enrolled in or eligible for the Department of Health / State of New Mexico Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Program or Medicaid and to assess what impact 3D + 2D-mammography (with a potentially lower recall rate but higher radiation exposure) might have on those perceptions.	5 years
Secondary	What are primary care providers' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and preferences regarding 3D + 2D- vs. 2D-mammography, identified through interviews and questionnaires	Use interviews to create qualitative (descriptive) assessments of care providers' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and preferences regarding 3D + 2D- vs. 2D-mammography.	5 years
Secondary	Breast cancer detection rate for 3D + 2D- vs. 2D-mammograms	Evaluate breast cancer detection rate (per 100 patients, percentage) in New Mexico women undergoing screening mammograms using 3D + 2D- vs. 2D-mammogram using PENRAD (mammography tracking software) data collected from the group as a whole.	5 years
Secondary	Breast cancer biopsy positive predictive value for 3D + 2D- vs. 2D-mammograms	Evaluate breast cancer biopsy positive predictive value (per 1000 patients) in New Mexico women undergoing screening mammograms using 3D + 2D- vs. 2D-mammogram using PENRAD (mammography tracking software) data collected from the group as a whole.	5 years
Secondary	Screening outcome of women undergoing 3-D mammography	Evaluate screening outcome in New Mexico women undergoing screening and offered 3-D mammography based on eligibility requirements for NM House Bill 2, using retrospective chart review.	5 years
Secondary	Compliance with recall recommendations of women undergoing 3-D mammography	Evaluate compliance with recall recommendations in New Mexico women undergoing screening and offered 3-D mammography based on eligibility requirements for NM House Bill 2, using retrospective chart review.	5 years
Secondary	Breast cancer detection rate in women undergoing 3-D mammography	Evaluate breast cancer detection rate (per 100 patients) of New Mexico women undergoing screening and offered 3-D mammography based on eligibility requirements for NM House Bill 2, using retrospective chart review.	5 years
Secondary	Positive predictive value of women undergoing 3-D mammography	Evaluate positive predictive value (per 1000 patients) in New Mexico women undergoing screening and offered 3-D mammography based on eligibility requirements for NM House Bill 2, using retrospective chart review.	5 years