Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT03716245 |
| Other study ID # |
SCLND0919 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
February 27, 2019 |
| Est. completion date |
January 20, 2024 |
Study information
| Verified date |
January 2024 |
| Source |
Hubei Cancer Hospital |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis are defined as
Ⅲc stage (N3) according to the newly published 8th AJCC TNM staging system. No concret guide
line was supported to such patients. It is still pending whether to exert supraclavicular
lymph node dissection to breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node
metastasis.
To evaluate the clinical significance and complication of supraclavicular lymph node
dissection for breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis,
the investigators randomize patients into two groups, one group is supraclavicular lymph node
dissection with radiotherapy group, the other group is radiotherapy group.
Description:
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of deaths from cancer in women
worldwide. Breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis are
defined as Ⅲc stage (N3) according to the newly published 8th AJCC TNM staging system.
Clinical outcomes are similar for patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node
metastases at first presentation and for patients with recurrent ipsilateral supraclavicular
lymph node metastases. The survival rate was lower in patients with ipsilateral
supraclavicular lymph node metastases than in patients with lower axillary or subclavian
nodal involvement. No concrete guide line was supported to such patients. It is still pending
whether to exert supraclavicular lymph node dissection to breast cancer patients with
ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis. Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular
lymph node metastases who were treated with surgery or radiotherapy and achieved good neck
control were reported to achieve better survival than those for whom surgical treatment or
irradiation did not result in good local control.
Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases should be offered a combined
modality approach, including systemic therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Furthermore, local
treatment, usually including axillary and supraclavicular lymph node, either by surgical
clearance or by radical radiotherapy, can prevent the tumor cells from drainage, might be
play a more important role. However, the role of surgical removal of the supraclavicular
nodes is uncertain compared with radical radiotherapy. To our knowledge, the available
literature comparing these two local treatments of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node
metastases is scarce. Furthermore, the studies comparing the outcome of dissection of
supraclavicular lymph node combined with local radiotherapy and radiotherapy of
supraclavicular lymph node is also rare. All the related reports up to date have mixed them
up.
To evaluate the clinical significance and complication of supraclavicular lymph node
dissection for breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis,
we randomize patients into two groups, one group is supraclavicular lymph node dissection
with radiotherapy group, the other group is radiotherapy group.
Therefore, in addition to investigating the role of surgical removal of the supraclavicular
nodes in Chinese patients, we also try to reveal the potential difference between these two
treatments, hoping to bring more insight into clinical practice.