Spa Therapy for Upper or Lower Limb Lymphoedema

Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

— THERMOEDEME  

Official title:

Spa Therapy for Upper or Lower Limb Lymphoedema : a Randomized and Comparative Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03580109
• Other study ID #: THERMOEDEME
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 20, 2019
• Est. completion date: December 2025

Study information

• Verified date: March 2024
• Source: Association Francaise pour la Recherche Thermale
• Contact: Alexa COMTE
• Phone: 334 76 76 66 39
• Email: alexa.comte[@]univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

THERMOEDEME is a comparative, controlled, randomized, multicenter and simple blinded (investigator) trial.

The aim of this study is to evaluate effects of spa therapy in phlebology with a therapeutic education program in daily life of patients suffering lymphoedema.

Description:

Lymphoedema is a chronic disease related to an insufficiency of the lymphatic system, which most often affects the limbs. Secondary forms are the most common, particularly those following surgical and radiotherapy treatments for cancer, the most classic being the post-therapeutic large arm of breast cancer.

The lymphoedema is a traditional phlebology indication in spa therapy. The spa therapy linked with therapeutic education could constitute a favorable environment for the treatment of lymphoedema.

The primary endpoint is the comparison of the rate of patients improved from baseline to 6 months on LMS27 (upper limb lymphoedema) or LYMQOL-LEG (lower limb lymphoedema) (Improvement is defined as 7 points between baseline and 6-month follow-up).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 160
• Est. completion date: December 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• 18 years old and older

• available for a spa treatment (phlebology indication) during 18 days and a follow up period of 15 months

• with permanent lymphoedema of the upper or lower limb (2 ou 3 stade of International Society for Lymphology scale)

• voluntary to participate to the study, informed consent form signed after appropriate information

• affiliation to the social security system or equivalent

Exclusion Criteria:

• cancer undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment in primary phase

• the baseline score of LMS27 or LYMQOL-LEG > 79

• pain of upper limb linked with a radical plexitis

• contra-indication of spa treatment (cancer in progress, psychiatrics disorders, immunodeficiency)

• Erysipelas case history in the last 6 months or pachyderma and lymphangiectasia

• no previous spa treatment for upper limb lymphoedema during the spa year

• risk of intensive treatment in the next 6 months

• subject participating to an other clinical study interventional

• pregnancy, parturient or breast feeding

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Breast Cancer
• Gynaecological Cancer
• Lymphedema
• Lymphoedema
• Lymphoma
• Malignant Disease
• Prostate Cancer
• Prostatic Neoplasms

Intervention

Other:
• Immediate spa treatment
Spa treatment linked education therapeutic in lymphoedema post breast cancer (whirlpool bath with automatic air and water massage cycles, massaging shower/individuals and groups educational sessions)
• Late spa treatment
Spa treatment linked education therapeutic in lymphoedema post breast cancer (whirlpool bath with automatic air and water massage cycles, massaging shower/individuals and groups educational sessions)

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Cabinet de médecine vasculaire	Albertville
France	CHU Amiens Picardie	Amiens
France	Thermes Argelès-Gazost	Argelès-Gazost
France	Thermes Barbotan Les Bains	Barbotan-les-Thermes
France	Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste	Grenoble
France	Thermes La Léchère	La Léchère
France	CH Lourdes	Lourdes
France	Thermes Luz Saint Sauveur	Luz-Saint-Sauveur
France	Centre Léon Berard	Lyon
France	CH Tarbes	Tarbes
France	CHU Toulouse	Toulouse
France	Clinique générale HPDA	Valence
France	Clinique du Tonkin	Villeurbanne

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Association Francaise pour la Recherche Thermale	Floralis

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

References & Publications (16)

Blaise S, Villemur B, Richaud C, Rastel D, Bucci B, Evra V, Bouchet JY, les membres du réseau GRANTED, B.Satger. Conception d'un programme d'éducation thérapeutique pour les patients porteurs de lymphoedème : " Vivre avec un lymphoedème ". J Mal Vasc 2011,online access : doi:10.1016/j.jmv.2011.10.006

Carpentier PH, Blaise S, Satger B, Genty C, Rolland C, Roques C, Bosson JL. A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating balneotherapy in patients with advanced chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):447-454.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Oct 15. — View Citation

Carpentier PH, Colomb M, Poensin D, Satger B. [Incidence of erysipelas of the lower limbs in a spa resort. Efficacy of a strategy of sanitation education (La Lechere: 1992-1997)]. J Mal Vasc. 2001 Apr;26(2):97-9. French. — View Citation

Carpentier PH, Fabry R. Crénothérapie des maladies vasculaires. In: Queneau P, editor. Médecine Thermale, faits et preuves. Paris: Masson Ed; 2000. p. 102-15.

Carpentier PH, Satger B, Poensin D, Trens C, Arnold M, Trolliet C, Noilhetas J, Chauvin E, Laurès J Therapeutic education combined with balneotherapy in lymphedema patients. Communication acceptée à l'American Venous Forum (Orlando 25/02/2016, publication en préparation)

Devoogdt N, Lemkens H, Geraerts I, Van Nuland I, Flour M, Coremans T, Christiaens MR, Van Kampen M. A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: validity and reliability. Int Angiol. 2010 Oct;29(5):401-7. — View Citation

International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. Consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2003 Jun;36(2):84-91. — View Citation

Keeley, Vaughan; Crooks, Sue; Locke, Jane; Veigas, Debbie; Riches, Katie and Hilliam, Rachel (2010). A quality of life measure for limb lymphoedema (LYMQOL). Journal of Lymphoedema, 5(1) pp. 26-37

Launois R, Alliot F. Quality of Life Scale in Upper Limb Lymphoedema - A validation Study. Lymphology 33, 2000 (Suppl) : 266-74.

Lim P, Li H, Neoh D, Ng SK. Health-related Quality of Life Measurement Tools for Lymphedema: A Review of the Literature. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 27;10(4):e4276. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004276. eCollection 2022 Apr. — View Citation

Lymphœdema Framework. Best Practice for the Management of Lymphœdema. International consensus. London: MEP Ltd, 2006:1-54.

Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C. — View Citation

Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2004 Oct;4(5):581-5. doi: 10.1586/14737167.4.5.581. — View Citation

Pusic AL, Cemal Y, Albornoz C, Klassen A, Cano S, Sulimanoff I, Hernandez M, Massey M, Cordeiro P, Morrow M, Mehrara B. Quality of life among breast cancer patients with lymphedema: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments and outcomes. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Mar;7(1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0247-5. Epub 2012 Dec 5. — View Citation

Rockson SG, Rivera KK. Estimating the population burden of lymphedema. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1131:147-54. doi: 10.1196/annals.1413.014. — View Citation

Vignes S. [Management of limb lymphedema]. Rev Med Interne. 2012 May;33(5):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 Jan 31. French. — View Citation

* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Evolution of lymphoedema quality of life assessed by the rate of patient with an improvement of the LMS27 scale (for upper limb lymphoedema).	Rate of patients with an improvement of 7 points minimum of the LMS27 scale (specific quality of life scale in upper limb lymphoedema) at 6 months.; The LMS27 scale is composed of 27 questions with 5 answers possible : never, rarely, sometimes, often, always. The answer's score is respectively 1 (worse outcome) to 5 (better outcome). The higher the score is, the better the lymphoedema quality of life is.	6 months
Primary	Evolution of lymphoedema quality of life assessed by the rate of patient with an improvement of the LYMQOL-LEG scale (for lower limb lymphoedema).	Rate of patients with an improvement of 7 points minimum of the LYMQOL-LEG scale (specific quality of life scale in lower limb lymphoedema) at 6 months.; The LYMQOL-LEG scale is composed of 26 questions with 4 answers possible: not at all, a little, quite a bit, a lot.; In order to to standardize with the LMS27 scale (for upper limb lymphoedema), the quotations are reversed: the answer's score is respectively 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome). The higher the score is, the better the lymphoedema quality of life is.	6 months
Secondary	Evolution of lymphoedema quality of life assessed by the LMS27 scale (for upper limb lymphoedema) before / after spa therapy.	Evolution of the LMS27 scale (specific quality of life scale in upper limb lymphoedema) at 6 and 12 months.; The LMS27 scale is composed of 27 questions with 5 answers possible : never, rarely, sometimes, often, always. The answer's score is respectively 1 (worse outcome) to 5 (better outcome). The higher the score is, the better the lymphoedema quality of life is.	6 and 12 months
Secondary	Evolution of lymphoedema quality of life assessed by the LYMQOL-LEG scale (for lower limb lymphoedema) before / after spa therapy.	Evolution of the LYMQOL-LEG scale (specific quality of life scale in lower limb lymphoedema) at 6 and 12 months.; The LYMQOL-LEG scale is composed of 26 questions with 4 answers possible: not at all, a little, quite a bit, a lot.; In order to to standardize with the LMS27 scale (for upper limb lymphoedema), the quotations are reversed: the answer's score is respectively 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome). The higher the score is, the better the lymphoedema quality of life is.	6 and 12 months
Secondary	Evolution of lymphoedema quality of life assessed by the most embarrassing items of the LMS27 scale (for upper lymphoedema).	Evolution of 5 items the most embarrassing chosen by the patients in the LMS27 scale (specific quality of life scale in upper limb lymphoedema) at 6 and 12 months.; The LMS27 scale is composed of 27 questions with 5 answers possible : never, rarely, sometimes, often, always. The answer's score is respectively 1 (worse outcome) to 5 (better outcome). The higher the score is, the better the lymphoedema quality of life is.	6 and 12 months
Secondary	Evolution of lymphoedema quality of life assessed by the most embarrassing items of the LYMQOL-LEG scale (for lower limb lymphoedema)	Evolution of 5 items the most embarrassing chosen by the patients in the LYMQOL-LEG scale (specific quality of life scale in lower limb lymphoedema) at 6 and 12 months.; The LYMQOL-LEG scale is composed of 26 questions with 4 answers possible: not at all, a little, quite a bit, a lot.; In order to to standardize with the LMS27 scale (for upper limb lymphoedema), we decide to reverse the quotations: the answer's score is respectively 1 (worse outcome) to 4 (better outcome). The higher the score is, the better the lymphoedema quality of life is.	6 and 12 months
Secondary	Improvement of quality of life assessed by the generic quality of life: Euroquol EQ5D-3L	Improvement of generic quality of life (the Euroquol EQ5D-3L scale) at 6 and 12 months.; EQ5D-3L is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of lige that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The EQ5D-3L has 6 items intended to measure general health. The top 5 rate mobility, independence, daily activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression, and are rated according to 3 values from "No problem" to "Problem" or "Incapacity". This results in an index score. The last item deals with perceived health on the day the questionnaire is filled in and uses a visual analogue scale from 0 (wors) to 100 (best health possible) (Visual Analog Scale Score)	6 and 12 months
Secondary	Upper or lower limb evaluation	Evolution of the volume of the upper or lower extremity evaluated (overall and then by segment) from staged perimeter measurements at 6 and 12 months.	6 and 12 months
Secondary	Consumption of care between the 2 groups (immediate treatment/delayed treatment)	Evaluation of the costs incurred by lymphoedema (hospitalisations, medical and paramedical acts, treatments).	6 and 12 months
Secondary	Compliance of spa therapy	Evaluation of the spa therapy compliance : number of health care performed in spa therapy.	After spa therapy
Secondary	Achievement educational aims	Verification of the achievement of educational targets in spa therapy by phone follow up.	3 months, 9 months.
Secondary	Adverse events	Evaluation of all adverse events related to treatment, or not, according to the usual criteria of pharmacovigilance in clinical trials.	12 months
Secondary	Functional evaluation	Monthly measurements of functional discomfort from inclusion to 12 months; The functional discomfort is measured monthly by a visual scale : not discomfort to maximal discomfort.	12 months
Secondary	Long term evaluation	Evaluation of the maintenance of benefits at 12 months (stability of the long term effect) on the primary outcome and secondary outcomes.	12 months
Secondary	Effect size	Confirmation of the extent of the effect between 6 and 12 months on the primary outcome and secondary outcomes.	6 and 12 months
Secondary	Sub group analysis	Sub group analysis on the primary outcome measure (stratification on primo spa therapy, lymphoedema severity and lymphoedema localization)	6 months