Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02024568
Other study ID # 105/13
Secondary ID WS1826148
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase Phase 2
First received December 17, 2013
Last updated December 26, 2013
Start date December 2013
Est. completion date May 2015

Study information

Verified date December 2013
Source Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
Contact Jonathan Grunfeld, M.D.
Phone ++972-(0)57-7346453
Email grunfeldj@asaf.health.gov.il
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Israel: Israeli Health Ministry Pharmaceutical Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Paclitaxel is chemotherapeutic agent used in many of the most common anti-cancer regimens. Its use is frequently associated with moderate to severe muscle and joint pain that may persist for several days after the treatment. This side effect, known as "Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome, has a significant impact on the quality of life and functional abilities of those receiving the treatment, and is not alleviated by many of the interventions attempted for that purpose.

Sporadic reports suggest that a drug called gabapentin may be effective in the management of this adverse effect. Observations from our practice indicate that pregabalin, which possesses similar biological activity to that of gabapentin, may also be useful in preventing and treating paclitaxel associated myalgia - arthralgia.

The current study represents an initial evaluation of the hypothesis that pregabalin may be beneficial in the management of the symptoms due to the "Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome". The investigation will be carried out in the format of a small scale, randomized, placebo controlled trial with patients receiving paclitaxel in the course of standard treatment for breast cancer.


Description:

Taxane Related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome:

Paclitaxel and docetaxel are the major representatives of the drug class of taxanes, agents commonly used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. They interfere with the mitotic process of dividing cells by stabilizing the microtubules and are the mainstay of treatment in lung, breast, and ovarian cancer, among others. The adverse side effects associated with taxane treatment frequently impair the quality of life of cancer patients and occasionally impose discontinuation of the oncological treatment of choice (Forsyth, Balmaceda et al. 1997; Saibil, Fitzgerald et al. 2010).

The phenomenon of diffuse pain involving joints and muscles in the wake of treatment with taxanes commonly referred to as Taxane related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome (from here on noted as TAMS) is well known and documented (Rowinsky, Chaudhry et al. 1993). It is common, as apparent from a recent retrospective study of patients treated with regimens used for breast cancer which revealed an 80% incidence of taxane related pain (Saibil, Fitzgerald et al. 2010).

The pain may be localized, regional or diffuse, most commonly in the back, hips, shoulders, thighs, legs and feet (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). It is usually depicted as arthralgia-myalgia due to the difficulty to associate it clearly with either the joints or the muscles (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). The nature of the sensation is described as aching, deep pain, often with associated radiating, shooting, stabbing, pulsating elements (Loprinzi, Maddocks-Christianson et al. 2007). The sensation is of unique quality previously unencountered by those experiencing it, the description of which is not compatible with established reports of neuropathic pain.

The syndrome may be of incapacitating intensity, capable of imposing days of bed restriction on those suffering from it. This burden is often extended to significant others who have to remain and care for the daily needs of those handicapped by the pain. Attempts of treatment with steroids, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and opioid analgesics frequently fail to produce satisfactory results (Garrison, McCune et al. 2003).

Pregabalin - Basic Pharmacology and Potential for Treatment of TAMS:

Pregabalin is a small molecule with an established efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic pain (Gajraj 2007). It is known to interact with the α2-δ subunit of voltage gated calcium channels present in multiple tissues, most prominently in brain and muscle (Taylor, Angelotti et al. 2007).

Pregabalin is rapidly absorbed via a specialized transport system, reaching a peak concentration in the serum circa one hour after oral ingestion (Gajraj 2005). Bioavailability exceeds 90% and the pharmacokinetic profile is linear throughout the clinically relevant concentrations (Gajraj 2005). It does not bind significantly to proteins in the blood stream, does not undergo any modification during its passage through the organism, and is eliminated unchanged in the urine (Gajraj 2005). No significant pharmacokinetic interactions have been reported to date (Gajraj 2007).

Currently pregabalin is being used in the treatment of neuropathic pain and as an anti-epileptic agent (Gajraj 2007). Accumulated evidence is supportive of a high degree of safety in its use, with the most common side effects constituting of mild to moderate degree dizziness, somnolence, feeling drunk, fatigue and increased weight (Harmark, van Puijenbroek et al. 2011).

Sporadic reports suggest that gabapentin may be effective in alleviating Taxol related arthralgia-myalgia symptoms (Nguyen and Lawrence 2004). On grounds of similar pharmacodynamics (Bryans and Wustrow 1999) it may be hypothesized that pregabalin also has potential to alleviate the paclitaxel related arthralgia-myalgia. Furthermore, observations from our clinical oncology service are supportive of this hypothesis.

Evaluation of the Taxane Related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome:

Pain constitutes a major component of the Taxane related Arthralgia-Myalgia Syndrome (from here on referred to as TAMS) (Garrison, McCune et al. 2003). We propose that pregabalin may have a significantly beneficial effect on the pain secondary to this syndrome. Consequently, evaluation of the pain before and after treatment with the study drug by means of a well established pain scoring method is required.

Modern pain research acknowledges the subjective and complex nature of pain that complicates its assessment. Furthermore, ethical imperatives place constraints on the comparative control to serve the in evaluation of a novel analgesic intervention (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993). One of the solutions to this issue, using normalized ordinal evaluations of pain and analgesic drug consumption around a central value in a manner that also accounts for changes in analgesic drug requirements (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993) will serve for direct assessment of the study hypothesis.

The Integrated Assessment of Pain Score and Rescue Analgesic Treatment evaluation according to Silverman et al will be augmented by raw pain assessment by means of a well established pain scoring method (Farrar, Portenoy et al. 2000).

Bed restriction is a direct result of the TAMS that is often described by those suffering from it. It is hereby proposed to monitor bed restriction by recording the number of hours spent in horizontal position between the time of getting up from the night's sleep and the hour of going to bed at the end of the day. The proposed measure will compare the number of hours spent in the horizontal position on the day preceding the taxane treatment, and the number of hours spent in that position on the day with the highest score of pain during the week following treatment. The sample size is not calculated to serve the validation of this novel measure, but an effort to assess its association with established quality-of-life scores will be made.

The current proposal is focused on evaluating an intervention with potential to have a positive impact on the quality of life of individuals receiving chemotherapy with taxanes. The FACT-Taxane scale is a psychometric tool specifically developed to assess the impact of taxane based treatment (Cella, Peterman et al. 2003). However, quality of life is a composite measure, and requires a larger sample size to determine efficacy, and therefore it will only serve as a secondary endpoint.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 38
Est. completion date May 2015
Est. primary completion date March 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Screening Criteria:

- Signature of consent form.

- Legal competence for expression of consent.

- Patients with confirmed diagnosis of cancer of breast, free of confounding pain before the administration of chemotherapy.

- Recommendation for treatment with paclitaxel containing protocols, prior to initiation of chemotherapy.

- Age over 18.

Inclusion criteria for treatment phase:

- Fulfillment of screening criteria.

- Experience of myalgia-arthralgia related pain of moderate or worse degree of severity after a course of paclitaxel containing chemotherapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Ongoing treatment with pregabalin or gabapentin.

- Known restricting adverse events related to treatment with pregabalin or gabapentin.

- Renal failure with GFR less than 30ml/min.

- Participation in clinical trial 3 weeks or less prior to screening.

- Confounding myalgia and / or arthralgia unrelated to chemotherapy.

- Medical condition compromising the likelihood of completing the trial.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Pregabalin
See arm description
Placebo
See arm description

Locations

Country Name City State
Israel Assaf HaRofeh Medical Center Be'er Ya'akov (Zerifin)

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Israel, 

References & Publications (14)

Bryans JS, Wustrow DJ. 3-substituted GABA analogs with central nervous system activity: a review. Med Res Rev. 1999 Mar;19(2):149-77. Review. — View Citation

Cella D, Peterman A, Hudgens S, Webster K, Socinski MA. Measuring the side effects of taxane therapy in oncology: the functional assesment of cancer therapy-taxane (FACT-taxane). Cancer. 2003 Aug 15;98(4):822-31. — View Citation

Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000 Dec 1;88(3):287-94. — View Citation

Forsyth PA, Balmaceda C, Peterson K, Seidman AD, Brasher P, DeAngelis LM. Prospective study of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy with quantitative sensory testing. J Neurooncol. 1997 Oct;35(1):47-53. — View Citation

Gajraj NM. Pregabalin for pain management. Pain Pract. 2005 Jun;5(2):95-102. — View Citation

Gajraj NM. Pregabalin: its pharmacology and use in pain management. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1805-15. Review. Erratum in: Anesth Analg.2008 May;106(5):1584. — View Citation

Garrison JA, McCune JS, Livingston RB, Linden HM, Gralow JR, Ellis GK, West HL. Myalgias and arthralgias associated with paclitaxel. Oncology (Williston Park). 2003 Feb;17(2):271-7; discussion 281-2, 286-8. Review. — View Citation

Härmark L, van Puijenbroek E, Straus S, van Grootheest K. Intensive monitoring of pregabalin: results from an observational, Web-based, prospective cohort study in the Netherlands using patients as a source of information. Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):221-31. doi: 10.2165/11585030-000000000-00000. — View Citation

Loprinzi CL, Maddocks-Christianson K, Wolf SL, Rao RD, Dyck PJ, Mantyh P, Dyck PJ. The Paclitaxel acute pain syndrome: sensitization of nociceptors as the putative mechanism. Cancer J. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):399-403. — View Citation

Nguyen VH, Lawrence HJ. Use of gabapentin in the prevention of taxane-induced arthralgias and myalgias. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1767-9. — View Citation

Rowinsky EK, Chaudhry V, Forastiere AA, Sartorius SE, Ettinger DS, Grochow LB, Lubejko BG, Cornblath DR, Donehower RC. Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: neuromuscular toxicity is dose-limiting. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;11(10):2010-20. — View Citation

Saibil S, Fitzgerald B, Freedman OC, Amir E, Napolskikh J, Salvo N, Dranitsaris G, Clemons M. Incidence of taxane-induced pain and distress in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective, outcomes-based survey. Curr Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(4):42-7. — View Citation

Silverman DG, O'Connor TZ, Brull SJ. Integrated assessment of pain scores and rescue morphine use during studies of analgesic efficacy. Anesth Analg. 1993 Jul;77(1):168-70. — View Citation

Taylor CP, Angelotti T, Fauman E. Pharmacology and mechanism of action of pregabalin: the calcium channel alpha2-delta (alpha2-delta) subunit as a target for antiepileptic drug discovery. Epilepsy Res. 2007 Feb;73(2):137-50. Epub 2006 Nov 28. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Integrated Numeric Pain Scores and Rescue Analgesic Medication Requirement as calculated by the method proposed by Silverman et al (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993). Modern pain research acknowledges the subjective and complex nature of pain that complicates its assessment. Furthermore, ethical imperatives place constraints on the comparative control to serve the in evaluation of a novel analgesic intervention (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993). One of the solutions to this issue, using normalized ordinal evaluations of pain and analgesic drug consumption around a central value in a manner that also accounts for changes in analgesic drug requirements (Silverman, O'Connor et al. 1993) will serve for direct assessment of the study hypothesis. 16 months from study initiation No
Secondary Numeric Pain Score (NPS) Numeric Pain score (NPS*) evaluation of Myalgia / Arthralgia related pain. The scores to be considered will be the maximum values recorded over the course of the 7 days starting on the day the taxane is administered.
*Numerical Rating Scale: 0-1 No pain; 2-3 Mild pain; 4-5 Discomforting - moderate pain; 6-7 Distressing - severe pain; 8-9 Intense - very severe pain; 10 - Unbearable pain
8 days after receiving cycle of paclitaxel No
Secondary The additional number of hours spent in horizontal position (?HHP**) The additional number of hours spent in horizontal position (?HHP**) as when lying down in bed, on couch, etc., during waking time will serve as an additional endpoint. It will be derived by subtracting the number of hours spent in horizontal position prior to taxane treatment from the number of hours in that position during the day with the highest pain score in the course of the week following treatment. Daytime hours will be calculated as the time between getting up in the morning and going to bed in the evening on the day preceding the infusion of the taxane.
HHP - the number of Hours in Horizontal Position. ?HHP - the additional number of hours in horizontal position; Post Treatment HHP - Baseline HHP = ?HHP.
8 days after receiving cycle of paclitaxel No
Secondary FACT-taxane score The FACT-Taxane scale is a psychometric tool specifically developed to assess the impact of taxane based treatment on the quality of life (Cella, Peterman et al. 2003). Both the severity of pain and associated impact on daily activities, as well as established side effects of the study drug may affect the score on this scale. On day of recruitment to active phase + one week after 4th cycle of paclitaxel since recruitment to active phase. No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04681911 - Inetetamab Combined With Pyrotinib and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT04890327 - Web-based Family History Tool N/A
Terminated NCT04066790 - Pyrotinib or Trastuzumab Plus Nab-paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-positive Breast Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT03591848 - Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility N/A
Recruiting NCT03954197 - Evaluation of Priming Before in Vitro Maturation for Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients N/A
Terminated NCT02202746 - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the VEGFR-FGFR-PDGFR Inhibitor, Lucitanib, Given to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT01472094 - The Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) With Breast Cancer Study
Completed NCT06049446 - Combining CEM and Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Tumors
Withdrawn NCT06057636 - Hypnosis for Pain in Black Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05560334 - A Single-Arm, Open, Exploratory Clinical Study of Pemigatinib in the Treatment of HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With FGFR Alterations Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05501769 - ARV-471 in Combination With Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic ER+, HER2- Breast Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04631835 - Phase I Study of the HS-10352 in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Phase 1
Completed NCT04307407 - Exercise in Breast Cancer Survivors N/A
Recruiting NCT03544762 - Correlation of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-estradiol PET Imaging With ESR1 Mutation Phase 3
Terminated NCT02482389 - Study of Preoperative Boost Radiotherapy N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT00068003 - Harvesting Cells for Experimental Cancer Treatments
Completed NCT00226967 - Stress, Diurnal Cortisol, and Breast Cancer Survival
Recruiting NCT06019325 - Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Chronic Pain Incidence and Acute Pain Scores After Mastectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT06037954 - A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT06006390 - CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2