Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05585411
Other study ID # 4-2022-0824
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 1, 2022
Est. completion date November 1, 2026

Study information

Verified date October 2023
Source Yonsei University
Contact TaeHoon Kim
Phone +82 02-2228-8467
Email thkimcardio@yuhs.ac
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

PROTECT-SYNC study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 7 medical centers across Republic of Korea will enroll 450 patients during 2 years of enrollment period, and followed for 2 years of follow-up period. The purpose of this study to compare the clinical outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) compared to Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) in bradyarrhythmia patients who require high burden of ventricular pacing (>40%).


Description:

PROTECT-SYNC study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial that is designed to assess whether LBBAP may reduce the risk of composite primary endpoint including all cause mortalty, HF hospitalization and/or urgent HF related visit, occurrence of pacing induced CMP, and CRT-upgrade event, compared to RVP in patients who require substantial (>40%) ventricular pacing. Patients who require pacemaker and substantial (>40%) ventricular pacing will be randomized to LBBAP or RVP group, and a total of 7 medical centers across Republic of Korea will enroll 450 patients during 2 years of enrollment period, and followed for 2 years of follow-up period.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 450
Est. completion date November 1, 2026
Est. primary completion date November 1, 2026
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 19 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. At least 19 years old and willing and capable to give informed consent 2. Patients who is willing and able to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations. 3 Scheduled to receive a pacemaker implant 4. Substantial percentage of V pacing rate (>40%) is anticipated Exclusion criteria: 1. Incapacitated or unable to read or write 2. Patient who is an indication of ICD or CRT 3. History of prosthetic valve surgery on tricuspid valve 4. Prior myocardial infarction including ventricular septum 5. Life expectancy < 12 months due to any condition 6. Unavailable for at least 24 months of follow-up visits 7. Pregnant or breastfeeding at the time of signing consent 8. Prior Heart transplant surgery 9. Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava (PLSVC)

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Left bundle branch area pacing
LBBAP success is defined if ventricular lead is successfully placed at interventricular septum and RBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing. LBB capture is defined if fulfilling criterion 1 and at least one in criteria 2. RBBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing One of the following should be met: Abrupt shortening of Stim-LVAT (stimulus to peak of the R wave in V6 [LV activation time]) of >10ms during increasing output Short and constant stim-LVAT and the shortest stim-LVAT <75ms in non-LBBB and <85ms in LBBB Programmed stimulation by pacing lead changes QRS morphology from nonselective LBB to LV septal capture LBB potential (LBB-V interval of 15 to 35ms) Transition from nonselective LBB capture to selective LBB capture at near threshold outputs If criterion 1 is fulfilled but none in criteria 2 is met, the procedure is considered to be deep septal pacing (DSP).
Right ventricular pacing
Right ventricular pacing is the traditional pacing modality for ventricular pacing. Implantation of a RV pacing lead (apex or septum of right ventricle) will be attempted using the standard-of-care technique first

Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Bucheon Sejong Hospital Bucheon
Korea, Republic of GyeongSang National University Changwon Hospital Changwon
Korea, Republic of Chungbuk National University Hospital Chungju
Korea, Republic of Asan Medical Center Seoul
Korea, Republic of Kyunghee University hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital Seoul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Yonsei University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

References & Publications (11)

Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, Oren JW, Dandamudi G, Vijayaraman P. Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10. — View Citation

Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, Chung ES, Niazi I, Sherfesee L, Shinn T, Sutton MS; Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF) Trial Investigators. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 25;368(17):1585-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210356. — View Citation

Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabes JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylen I, Tolosana JM; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2022 May 1;43(17):1651. — View Citation

Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, Xiao F, Zhou X, Mao G, Vijayaraman P, Ellenbogen KA. Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block. Heart. 2019 Jan;105(2):137-143. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313415. Epub 2018 Aug 9. — View Citation

Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e382-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. Epub 2018 Nov 6. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e506-e508. — View Citation

Sharma PS, Patel NR, Ravi V, Zalavadia DV, Dommaraju S, Garg V, Larsen TR, Naperkowski AM, Wasserlauf J, Krishnan K, Young W, Pokharel P, Oren JW, Storm RH, Trohman RG, Huang HD, Subzposh FA, Vijayaraman P. Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: Results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Sep 3. Erratum In: Heart Rhythm. 2023 Jul;20(7):1100. — View Citation

Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA; MOde Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2932-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072769.17295.B1. Epub 2003 Jun 2. — View Citation

Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):764-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.006. — View Citation

Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Mar 15;29(4):744-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00586-4. — View Citation

Vijayaraman P, Ponnusamy S, Cano O, Sharma PS, Naperkowski A, Subsposh FA, Moskal P, Bednarek A, Dal Forno AR, Young W, Nanda S, Beer D, Herweg B, Jastrzebski M. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;7(2):135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Oct 28. — View Citation

Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H, Kutalek SP, Sharma A; Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3115-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3115. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary composite of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, occurrence of pacing induced cardiomyopathy, and an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy All-cause death: including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths.
Heart failure hospitalization: An unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required intravenous therapy.
Occurrence of Pacing induced cardiomyopathy : LVEF <50% and absolute LVEF decline =10% or increase in LVESV =15% Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): Upgrade from pacemaker to CRT-Pacemaker/CRT-Defibrillator due to impaired LV function (LVEF decrease to 40% or less).
during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
Secondary all cause mortality All cause deaths including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
Secondary Cardiovascular mortality Cardiovascular death during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
Secondary Heart failure hospitalization An unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required intravenous therapy. during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
Secondary success rate of LBBAP implantation LBBAP success is defined if ventricular lead is successfully placed at interventricular septum and RBB configuration observed during unipolar tip pacing. during 3days after pacemaker implantation
Secondary LBBAP related complications Loss of lead function or need for lead revision, extraction, replacement for any reason during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
Secondary LBB capture failure failed LBB capture, confirmed by investigator during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
Secondary Short-term procedure and Device related complications composite of device and procedure related complications until 7 days after procedure during 1wk after pacemaker implantation
Secondary Long-term procedure and Device related complications composite of device and procedure related complications after 7 days after procedure during 1wk after pacemaker implantation
Secondary Rate of LV systolic dysfunction LVEF <50% and absolute reduction in LVEF >10%, and/or an increase in LVESV =15%. 6month and 2yr after pacemaker implantation
Secondary Changes in cardiopulmonary exercise test parameters (VO2 peak, Exercise intensity, Peak Respiratory Exchange Ratio (Peak RER), Exercise time, age predicted aerobic capacity, VE/VCO2 slope, Lactate threshold, Max predicted HR, Max HR / Max predicted HR, presence of ST change , AF at Baseline, Incident AF during exercise 6month and 2yr after pacemaker implantation
Secondary Incidental atrial fibrillation Newly developed atrial fibrillation in patients without documented atrial fibrillation during 2 years after pacemaker implantation
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT06023784 - The Impact of LBBAP vs RVP on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block N/A
Completed NCT01019213 - Acute and Chronic Effect of His-pacing in Consecutive Patients With AV-block Phase 4
Completed NCT04884100 - enHEART - Exploring Full Content of Optical Signals to Enhance Cardiac Arrhythmia Screening N/A
Recruiting NCT05774262 - Pacemaker Implantation Versus Cardioneuroablation for Functional Atrioventricular Block N/A
Terminated NCT04093414 - Left Bundle Area Versus Selective His Bundle Pacing N/A
Withdrawn NCT00559143 - Biventricular Alternative Pacing Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04730921 - Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block (LEAP-Block) N/A
Recruiting NCT05575557 - Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Right Heart Evaluation for Patients Requiring Physiological Pacing Treatment N/A
Completed NCT00187278 - Biopace Study: Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization N/A
Recruiting NCT04595487 - LVSP vs RVP in Patients With AV Conduction Disorders N/A
Completed NCT04269733 - Risk of Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy
Recruiting NCT03851315 - Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in AVB Patients
Completed NCT02282033 - Safety and Performance Study of the Moderato System N/A
Completed NCT01922518 - Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing Determined by Electrocardiography N/A
Recruiting NCT04624763 - Protection of Cardiac Function With Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block N/A
Completed NCT03231826 - Arrhythmias in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients
Not yet recruiting NCT04437901 - COVIDAR - Arrhythmias in COVID-19
Recruiting NCT01717469 - Safety and the Effects of Isolated Left Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Bradyarrhythmias Phase 4
Completed NCT02154750 - AV Delay Optimization vs. Intrinsic Conduction in Pacemaker Patients With Long PR Intervals N/A
Completed NCT02462941 - Analysis of Adenosine on Sinus and Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction in the Pediatric Transplanted Heart Phase 1