View clinical trials related to Atrial Flutter.
Filter by:Background: Atypical atrial flutter (AAF) is an increasingly relevant clinical problem. Despite advancements in mapping and ablation techniques, the general management of these patients remain challenging especially when mapping cannot be performed during ongoing arrhythmia. There are no data whether induction of AAF is a feasible approach in these cases. Methods: The investigators retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent catheter ablation of AAF and compared procedural results between patients with ongoing tachycardia when starting the procedure and patients with induced AAF. For this retrospective study, the investigators analyzed patients undergoing ablation of AAF between April 2018 and January 2021 that were identified from the ablation database at the West German Heart and Vascular Center, Essen. All patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic as part of the clinical standard routine or contacted by telephone to assess the occurrence of clinical recurrence of any arrhythmia. In case the documentation was not performed at the institution, relevant documents and ECGs were requested and reviewed. This single-center cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital Essen, Germany, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments and was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Essen (number 21-10341-BO). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The primary study endpoint was to evaluate the outcome of patients with induced AAF in comparison to patients with ongoing AAF when starting the procedure. Furthermore, the investigators analyzed the type of recurrence during follow-up as well as the occurrence and results of repeat ablations at the institution. The investigators also evaluated if the recurrent AAF form was the same or de-novo compared to the AAF during previous procedure.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia and the prevalence increases with age. AF increases the risk of ischaemic stroke fivefold and accounts for almost one-third of all strokes. As AF is often asymptomatic there are many undetected cases. It is important to find patients with AF and additional risk factors for stroke in order to initiate oral anticoagulation treatment, which can reduce the risk of an ischaemic stroke by 60-70%. Screening is recommended in European guidelines, however the most suitable population and the most suitable device for AF detection remain to be defined. The main objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that AF screening with 14-days continuous ECG monitoring in high-risk individuals identified with a risk prediction model is more effective than routine care in identifying patients with undetected AF. Effectively detecting AF among patients with risk factors for ischaemic stroke has the potential to decrease mortality and morbidity, stroke burden and costs for the society as a whole.
The goal of this retrospective registry is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Refralon®, concentrate for solution for intravenous injection, as chemical cardioversion in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation and flutter in routine clinical practice. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the incidence of sinus rhythm restoration within 6 hours in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL) after the first dose of Refralon®? - What is the incidence of sinus rhythm restoration within 24 hours in patients with persistent AF/AFL after the first dose of Refralon®?
Acute atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFL) are the most common arrhythmias requiring management in the emergency department (ED). They are characterized by sudden onset of a rapid heart rate which may be irregular (AF) or regular (AFL). Our focus is on episodes of acute AF or AFL which are usually less than 48 hours in duration and are highly symptomatic, requiring rapid treatment in the ED. Management guidelines for acute AF/AFL have changed substantially in recent years with several recent revisions published by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP). The 2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist (CAEP Checklist) was very recently published to assist ED physicians in Canada and elsewhere manage patients who present to the ED with acute AF/AFL (Figure 1). The overall goal of this project is to improve the quality and safety of the immediate and subsequent care of patients seen in the ED with acute AF and AFL by implementing the principles of the CAEP Checklist at both The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) EDs and by working with TOH cardiologists to provide rapid cardiology follow-up processes for patients discharged from the ED. The Investigators propose a before-after cohort study using an interrupted time series design to evaluate implementation involving 720 patients at the two TOH EDs over a 24-month period.
The primary objective of the study is to reduce hospital admission and decrease time to disposition through establishing an effective treatment protocol for AF and Atrial Flutter in the Emergency Department of Spectrum Health Lakeland. Secondary outcome is to measure if oral diltiazem is an effective HR controlling agent in AF RVR and Flutter.
This research will investigate the PPG signal morphology related to physiological and non- physiological changes in arrhythmia-related heart rate as well as the performance of the PPG-based features previously developed within the framework of the Mini-Holter study to discriminate between several cardiac arrhythmias. To this end, clinical data will be recorded on patients by using a wrist-based PPG monitor simultaneously with 12-lead ECG and intracardiac electrogram (EGM) signals at the university hospital in Lausanne. Importantly, this study will remain purely observational as it will not change the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the included patients, nor will it interfere with the time course of the procedures. The aim of enHEART study is to validate on a larger database the ability of several previously developed PPG-based features to detect a variety of cardiac arrhythmias.
The Acutus Medical AcQForce Flutter clinical study is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized global study designed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the AcQBlate Force Sensing Ablation System in the ablation management of symptomatic cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter.
This is a randomized controlled trial examining whether Baylis's Versacross RF wire versus the conventional Baylis RF needle is better at puncturing through a thin wall in the heart (called "transseptal puncture") as measured by time to successful transseptal puncture, during cardiac ablation procedures.
Primary objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of closure strategies post venous access procedures. Hypothesis: We anticipate that the use of a venous closure device will decrease the time to hemostasis (TTH), time to ambulation (TTA) and time to discharge (TTD) compared to conventional methods of closure following venous access procedure.
Catheter ablation is recommended as first-line therapy for most patients with typical atrial flutter. The most common approach is to create an ablation line across the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI). Traditionally, atrial flutter ablation has been performed with a conventional approach using two catheters, an ablation catheter and a duodecapolar catheter that is placed at the level of the tricuspid annulus to confirm the CTI block. Recently, a single catheter approach has been described using the behavior of PR interval change during differential pacing over the ablation line to prove CTI block. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study analyzes the effectivity of a single catheter approach compared with conventional approach in terms of clinical outcomes.