View clinical trials related to Atrial Flutter.
Filter by:To characterize the impact of Atrial fibrillation (AFib) and Atrial Flutter (AFl) on signals measured using a wearable cardiac monitor prototype device. To evaluate the relationship of AFib/AFl symptom severity with various physiologic signals measured from the wearable cardiac monitor prototype device.
Clinical study intended to evaluate the feasibility of a new irrigated RF ablation catheter that allows the physiologist to perform a regular RF ablation procedure while it is being monitored through an imaging technique known as Optical Coherence Reflectometry (OCR). This technique is based upon the use of infrared light; it is innocuous for the human body and allows for the detection of the contact between the catheter tip with the tissue besides the lesion formation during the Radiofrequency (RF) application as the OCR technique is able to distinguish between ablated tissue and healthy tissue. Both features are able to provide a better control of the ablation procedure, which may become in a better clinical result in cardiac ablation procedures, especially in Atrial Fibrillation cases.
This study is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study to assess clinical performance of the SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) with MODUS II software for confirming correct tip position of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in adult subjects with altered cardiac rhythm.
The aim of the SEARCH-AF trial is to evaluate a novel diagnostic tool for detecting post-operative atrial fibrillation or flutter (POAF/AFL) in cardiac surgical subjects during the early, sub-acute post-operative period. The population includes cardiac surgical subjects who have either developed or are at risk for developing new onset POAF/AFL and who are at risk for stroke, as determined by their CHA2DS2-VASC (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years (2 points), diabetes mellitus, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (2 points), vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex class (female)) score. These subjects must not have had a history of AF/AFL before cardiac surgery. The intervention group will undergo up to 30 days of continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring with an adhesive, patch-based monitor (Medtronic SEEQ™ mobile cardiac telemetry system or the CardioSTAT (Icentia Inc.) cardiac rhythm monitoring device). The control group will receive usual care, which does not involve planned cardiac rhythm testing within the first 30 days after study randomization. The primary outcome is documentation of sustained atrial fibrillation or flutter within the first 30 days after randomization. In addition, subjects in both groups will undergo 14 days of continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring with the Medtronic SEEQ™ mobile cardiac telemetry system or the CardioSTAT (Icentia Inc.) cardiac rhythm monitoring device at 6±1 months after their index cardiac surgery.
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the and performance of the Imricor Medical Systems, Inc. (Imricor) MR Ablation Catheter when used with related accessories for the treatment of type I atrial flutter. The Vision Ablation Catheter and its accessories have been designed for use under fluoroscopic or magnetic resonance guidance. The study will be a single center study conducted at the Leipzig University Hospital Heart Center in Germany. The study population will consist of adult patients requiring ablation for type I atrial flutter.
The Radio Frequency Ablation for Atrial Flutter with Magnetic Resonance Guidance and Tracking Pilot Study (hereafter referred to as "pilot study") is a prospective, non- randomized, single-center, pilot study. The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Imricor Medical Systems, Inc. (Imricor) Vision Ablation Catheter when used with related accessories for the treatment of type I atrial flutter. The Vision Ablation Catheter and its accessories have been designed for use under fluoroscopic or magnetic resonance guidance.
Background: Cardiac arrhythmias can be terminated by electrical current applied by an external defibrillator. This treatment, named cardioversion, has been used for decades in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Several kinds of defibrillators exist, though the relative efficacy and safety of these defibrillators is not clear. During cardioversion, oxygen is being administered, and it has been a long-held belief that oxygen is always beneficial for the patient. This is now being challenged by recent studies suggesting excessive oxygenation to be potentially dangerous for the patients. Objective: 1. To compare the efficiency and safety of two different defibrillators 2. To investigate the effects of excessive oxygen on injury of the heart following cardioversion. Experimental design: Patients will be recruited at the outpatient clinic at the Department of Cardiology, Regional Hospital of Randers, Denmark as a part of the pre-cardioversion check. Patients will be randomized to cardioversion using one of two defibrillators and randomized to treatment with room air or 100% oxygen. The cardiac condition will be measured by blood samples before cardioversion, 4 hours after cardioversion and 3 months after cardioversion. Heart rhythm will be measured by ECG before cardioversion, 1 minute-, 30 minutes- and 4 hours after cardioversion.
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether Dabigatran leads to a faster complete left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus resolution as compared to Phenprocoumon. The secondary objectives of this trial are to assess the impact of Dabigatran versus Phenprocoumon on complete LAA thrombus resolution rate until week 6 and change in LAA thrombus volume under treatment as well as to assess and compare safety and tolerability of both drugs. A total of 110 patients with atrial fibrillation and LAA thrombus will be randomized to receive either Dabigatran (150 mg bid) or Phenprocoumon (INR 2-3) for a least three weeks. Thrombus resolution will be determined by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) 3 weeks after start of study treatment and subsequently at week 4 and 6 if necessary, i.e. LAA thrombus has not yet resolved. The study is terminated for each patient with the resolution of the LAA thrombus. For those patients whose thrombus still exists after 6 weeks treatment, the study is also terminated. Further treatments will be decided at the discretion of the treating physician.
The aim of this study is to identify the one electrode position out of two most commonly used for external electrical cardioversion of typical atrial flutter, which needs less delivered energy and less needed number of shocks for successful cardioversion.
Atrial Flutter [AFL] is a relatively frequent arrhythmia, considered as benign, but associated with both invalidating symptoms and thromboembolic risk. The objective of the treatment consists to on the one hand the sinus rhythm [SR] restoration and on the other hand the prevention of the long-term recurrence. In this clinical setting, AFL radiofrequency ablation [RFA] became the first line therapy due to its both high effectiveness and safety. The effectiveness of AFL RFA is attenuated by the subsequent risk of atrial fibrillation [AFib] close to 25% at 1 year. This risk of subsequent AFib is related to the common substrate between both arrhythmias. When AFib occurs, the interest to maintain the SR is still required, even if recent studies did not show a significant difference in term of total mortality between rate or rhythm control strategies [AFFIRM, RACE and PIAF studies]. The studies published underlined the anti-arrhythmic drugs limits in patients with both arrhythmias [AFib and AFL]. After years centered on the mechanisms and the electric treatments of AFib, researchers are nowadays focusing on the study's evaluation of the atrial tissue substrate. Accordingly, the renin-angiotensin system role was investigated in many works. Indeed, angiotensin II plays a role in the modification of atrial pressure and in the fibers stretching ["stretch"], conditions required for the development of AFib. Angiotensin II is also a factor implied in the tissue fibrosis leading to tissue proliferation and collagen alteration. These mechanisms lead to atria cells conduction disorders and refractory periods modification. Moreover, the enzyme of conversion expression and the angiotensin II receptors deterioration were observed in patients with AFib. This brings to the concept of AFib treatment while interfering on tissue remodeling by the way of renin-angiotensin system. Drugs such as the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition [ACEI] may reduce AFib in patients with heart failure. No randomized study so far has compared the ACEI drugs against placebo among high-risk patients of AFib in post AFL RFA area. On the basis of experimental and clinical study, the investigators seek to evaluate the ACEI use in the prevention of AFib in an AFL post RFA ablation.