View clinical trials related to Atrial Flutter.
Filter by:A randomized, open-blinded, prospective study to evaluate the timeliness and safety of direct current cardioversion (DCCV) when using methohexital when compared to the more often used propofol.
The purpose of this study is to determine if an AF detection intervention in men and women at least 70 years of age with undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) reduces the person-years incidence rate of stroke compared to usual care (no AF detection intervention).
A multi-center, randomized controlled 2-arm trial comparing the effectiveness of an innovative shared decision-making pathway and usual care for Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Prevention
To assess the acute and long-term efficacy of half-normal saline compared to normal saline for irrigation of open-irrigated catheters during catheter ablation for the treatment of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter.
Atrial flutter is a common condition that is effectively treated by ablation using radiofrequency. Due to its feasibility, effectiveness and low procedural risk, radiofrequency ablation is a first-line treatment of atrial flutter. Several studies have been published concerning the factors associated with the occurrence of atrial fibrillation during or after flutter ablation, in patients with and without clinical history of atrial fibrillation. 26 to 46% of patients are likely to develop it, according to ECG or Holter diagnoses. The figure rises to more than 50% with a diagnosis with an implantable loop recorder. In patients without a prior history of atrial fibrillation before ablation, anticoagulants are routinely administered 4-6 weeks after flutter removal by most cardiologists. Although there are no specific guidelines for anticoagulation after flutter ablation, it is currently recommended to treat the patient as for atrial fibrillation. It is therefore crucial to identify in advance patients at high risk of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation, in order to assess the appropriateness of maintaining oral anticoagulant therapy. The objectives of this study are: - to evaluate the frequency and identify the factors predicting the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation - to determine the risk of a stroke occurring in patients with atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation. The database consists in patients of the CHU Brugmann Hospital treated between 1996 and 2018.
This post-marketing study is conducted to characterize the ability of Apple Watch rhythm analysis software to identify Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and facilitate subsequent clinical evaluation among users who contact AppleCare.
The purpose of this study is to perform ultra-high density mapping of the left atrium (a chamber of the heart) using the the Rhythmia Mapping System and to determine whether additional ablation in areas of wavefront discontinuities identified by the map will reduce the likelihood of both atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
This study will compare the reliability and timeliness in data transmission of the Abbott Confirm Rx™ loop recorder with the Medtronic Reveal LINQ™ loop recorder.
Acute atrial fibrillation and flutter (AAFF) is characterized by rapid heart rates with onset less than seven days. It's the most common type of palpitation treated in the Emergency Department (ED). Some Canadian ED's will discharge 95% of AAFF patients whereas others admit up to 40%. With hospital and ED crowding, discharge is the most optimal, effective and safe strategy. Our aim is to improve the care and reduce the length of stay (LOS) of ED AAFF patients, while decreasing unnecessary hospitalizations. First, the investigators must understand the local barriers. In the previous study, the investigators conducted interviews of emergency physicians, cardiologists and AAFF patients. In Project 1b, the investigators created the CAEP ED AAFF Guidelines Checklist to assist physicians to manage AAFF more efficiently and safely. The Guidelines are comprised of two algorithms and four sets of checklists for ED assessment and management. They have been endorsed by CAEP and are published in CJEM. The investigators are now planning Project 2 in which the investigators will conduct a cluster [group] randomized trial at 11 Canadian EDs and enroll 1,300 patients over thirteen months. The investigators are not randomizing individual patients or doctors; instead the investigators are randomizing the start date of individual hospitals. Our goal is to introduce the new Guidelines into these hospitals to improve the care of AAFF patients. The investigators hope to improve AAFF management, leading to a significant decrease in hospital admissions and ED LOS. Central to our plans will be engagement of our two patient partners. Our behaviorally optimized intervention will be developed using state-of-the-art implementation science approaches informed by the results of Project 1a. The investigators will also undertake within-project and end-of-project knowledge translation and implementation (KTI) strategies to facilitate scale up and roll out of our program to ED departments in small, medium, and large hospitals across Canada (future Project 3). Ultimately the investigators expect to improve ED practices and decrease AAFF admissions and LOS, without increasing visits.
The purpose of the ArcticLine Feasibility Study is to collect preliminary safety and effectiveness data on the ArcticLine Catheter.