View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent.
Filter by:The goal of this multicentre, prospective, randomized, open, blinded for evaluation of end point (PROBE) controlled parallel-group superiority trial, is to compare the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) regarding freedom from atrial fibrillation (%) assessed by an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), ECG tracing or Holter at 12 months in patients with persistent AF. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Will first-line cryoballoon ablation for PVI compared to AAD, result in 25 % higher freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting > 6 minutes at 12 months (primary outcome) excluding three months initial blanking period, in patients with symptomatic and recurrent persistent AF? - Will first-line cryoablation for PVI, compared to AAD result in a superior improvement in health related Quality of Life (HRQoL), AF/AT burden, AF/AT progression and reversion, more reverse atrial remodeling, cognitive function, healthcare utilization with associated costs, better safety, at 12-24-36 months as compared with drug use? Participants will be randomized 1:1 to first-line PVI using the cryoballoon or to first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy and during 3 years follow-up undergo regular; - Continuous ECG monitoring for assessment of first AF recurrence and AF burden using an implantable cardiac monitor, - Regular echocardiographic exams for reverse atrial remodelling assessment, - HRQoL questionnaires - Assessment of cognitive function - Atrial fibrillation evaluation regarding structured characterisation and AF progression/regression - Assessment of Health care use and costs - Safety
Persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) can induce right atrial (RA) enlargement. Our previous study demonstrated patients with PerAF and RA enlargment may benefit from adjunctive RA ablation. Therefore, we conduct this multicenter, prospective, randomized study to confirm the value of adjunctive RA ablation.
Demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Ablacathâ„¢ Mapping Catheter and Ablamap® System in patients with all types of atrial fibrillation (AF) including paroxysmal or persistent or long-standing persistent, undergoing and De Novo or Redo procedures. Phenotype patients and demonstrate the prognostication power of Electrographic Flow (EGF®) maps among all subjects using 12-month follow-up outcomes following EGF-guided mapping and ablation.
The problem addressed in this proposal is related to the success rate in treating one of the most common arrhythmias in the Western population, atrial fibrillation (AF). Specifically, the success rate is particularly low in persistent atrial fibrillation, being up to 40% lower than the success rate for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased mortality and morbidity (stroke, heart failure, dementia, etc.). The most effective treatment is electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVI) by catheter ablation using radiofrequency or cryoablation of the atrial myocardial tissue. This ablation allows the elimination of the main initiators of the arrhythmia but may not address its maintainers, which play a significant role in persistent atrial fibrillation. This project proposes a new approach in studying the atrial myocardial substrate for persistent fibrillation ablation. Until now, maintainers of the arrhythmia have been sought by conducting studies during atrial fibrillation. In this project, we will use short-coupled stimulation techniques during sinus rhythm and analyze the response of the atrial myocardium, attempting to unmask areas where the impulse propagates abnormally/slowly. These areas of the atrial muscle with hidden slow conduction (HSC) could generate short circuits that maintain atrial fibrillation. It would be expected that these areas would show fragmented electrograms in response to rapid electrical stimuli not visible in basal rhythm. The study is divided into two sub-studies to be carried out over the 3-year project. 1. This study aims to test the feasibility of this new arrhythmic substrate characterization strategy, as well as observe differences between patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF and compare it with conventional fragmented electrogram analysis during AF. 2. The second sub-study will apply the knowledge acquired during the first phase regarding the characterization of electrograms-HSC, allowing for radiofrequency ablation procedures to be performed using a new substrate ablation technique consisting of the elimination of these electrograms and comparing the results with those patients who undergo conventional pulmonary vein ablation techniques. The ultimate goal, from a global point of view, is to demonstrate that it is possible to improve the results of arrhythmia treatment by identifying and eliminating these electrograms-HSC.
1050 patients with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) will be studied using conventional and advanced (three-dimensional and deformation imaging) echocardiography. Patients with moderate/severe isolated secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) will undergo blood tests to assess their proteomic profile and cardiac CT to measure the tricuspid annulus geometry. The project will aim to 1. assess the prevalence of moderate/severe isolated STR in patients with AF; 2. identify the mechanisms associated with the development of moderate-severe STR in patients with AF; 3. identify the proteomic profile associated with significant growth of tricuspid valve leaflets as a mechanism to protect patients with AF from the development of moderate/severe STR; 4. evaluate the effects of the restoration of sinus rhythm on the severity of STR and the remodeling of the right heart cardiac structures (i.e. right ventricle, right atrium, and tricuspid valve apparatus).
With the aging of society, the use of cardiac pacing in patients with irreversible bradycardia is increasingly widespread. As early as the 1950s, right ventricular pacing (RVP) began to be used in patients with atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome, but in fact such pacing could cause ventricular asynchrony, which could lead to long-term myocardial perfusion injury, valvular regurgitation, heart failure, and increased risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The latest guideline recommended reducing the proportion of right ventricular pacing. Additionally, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 35%) and complete left bundle branch block, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) has been recommended to improve cardiac function, but only about 30% of patients benefit from it, which may be related to poor left ventricular pacing site and myocardial scarring. In theory, His bundle pacing (HBP) compared with RVP can reduce the risk of functional tricuspid regurgitation when the lead position lies on the atrial side of the tricuspid valve, which may improve the right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure. In 2021, Domenico Grieco et al. explored the effect of HBP on right heart function. After 6 months of follow-up, it was found that HBP improved right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure compared with RVP. At present, there are few discussions on the effect of physiological pacing on right ventricular hemodynamics, and the sample size is small. Internationally, the discussion of the assessment of hemodynamics is limited to non-invasive evaluation (such as echocardiography, ECG, SPECT) The gold standard for right heart hemodynamics evaluation is the measurement of invasive right heart catheterization, and there has been no relevant research so far, so the investigators further designed a study of the effect of physiological pacing on hemodynamics.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Cryoablation in patients with early persistent atrial fibrillation as a first index procedure using continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring.
This post-market global registry will evaluate the ability of the Ablamap® Software to identify atrial fibrillation sources and guide ablation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Based on previous theoretical foundation and clinical practice experience, the investigators further propose a multi-center randomized prospective trial to compare the pure linear ablation strategy without pulmonary vein isolation to traditional PVI ablation for persistent AF. population size is 207. The participants will be randomized to the linear ablation group and PVI ablation group with a 2:1 ratio. the follow-up period is 12 months. The primary outcome is freedom from atrial fibrillation, the secondary outcome is complications related to ablation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the most frequently occurring, sustained arrhythmia, which causes significant morbidity and mortality. AF may not always be a totally random process. It can be maintained by stable and rapid reentrant circuits resulting in fibrillary conduction throughout the atria. During mapping of AF, difficulty is frequently encountered during the identification of culprit sites and an analysis of the wave propagation particularly when the electrogram signals demonstrate wide temporal and spatial disparities. Catheter ablation targeting regions with fractionated potentials or high frequencies during AF, has been previously proposed as a treatment strategy. However, the benefit of adjunctive CFAE (complex fractionated atrial electrogram) ablation or linear ablation after successful PVI (pulmonary vein isolation) was controversial based on the recent data from the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR AF II) trial. Therefore, the optimal ablation strategy for persistent AF remains undetermined and an alternative approach has to be explored.