View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent.
Filter by:Based on previous theoretical foundation and clinical practice experience, the investigators further propose a multi-center randomized prospective trial to compare the pure linear ablation strategy without pulmonary vein isolation to traditional PVI ablation for persistent AF. population size is 207. The participants will be randomized to the linear ablation group and PVI ablation group with a 2:1 ratio. the follow-up period is 12 months. The primary outcome is freedom from atrial fibrillation, the secondary outcome is complications related to ablation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the most frequently occurring, sustained arrhythmia, which causes significant morbidity and mortality. AF may not always be a totally random process. It can be maintained by stable and rapid reentrant circuits resulting in fibrillary conduction throughout the atria. During mapping of AF, difficulty is frequently encountered during the identification of culprit sites and an analysis of the wave propagation particularly when the electrogram signals demonstrate wide temporal and spatial disparities. Catheter ablation targeting regions with fractionated potentials or high frequencies during AF, has been previously proposed as a treatment strategy. However, the benefit of adjunctive CFAE (complex fractionated atrial electrogram) ablation or linear ablation after successful PVI (pulmonary vein isolation) was controversial based on the recent data from the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR AF II) trial. Therefore, the optimal ablation strategy for persistent AF remains undetermined and an alternative approach has to be explored.
A randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of staged hybrid ablation when compared with standard catheter ablation in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the most frequently occurring, sustained arrhythmia, which causes significant morbidity and mortality. AF may not always be a totally random process. It can be maintained by stable and rapid reentrant circuits resulting in fibrillary conduction throughout the atria. During mapping of AF, difficulty is frequently encountered during the identification of culprit sites and an analysis of the wave propagation particularly when the electrogram signals demonstrate wide temporal and spatial disparities. Catheter ablation targeting regions with fractionated potentials or high frequencies during AF, has been previously proposed as a treatment strategy. However, the benefit of adjunctive CFAE (complex fractionated atrial electrogram) ablation or linear ablation after successful PVI (pulmonary vein isolation) was controversial based on the recent data from the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR AF II) trial. Therefore, the optimal ablation strategy for persistent AF remains undetermined and an alternative approach has to be explored.
Patients with permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation require rate control medication to prevent excessive tachycardia. Since too much medication leads to a lower than expected heart rate (low output and symptoms) and too little leads to a fast heart rate (with associated symptoms), finding the ideal medication level (target that could fluctuate) is vital for patient's wellbeing. Clinicians adjust the medication each time patients come into the clinic (once or twice a year). In between those visits, medication is not changed even though patients would benefit for some incremental medication adjustment. Patients implanted with Biotronik devices have access to Home Monitoring® (HM), a user friendly remote monitoring system transmitting daily device and patient information to clinicians. Heart rate and activity hours can be tracked and this information could be used to adjust medication. In a step by step process, patients will gradually gain autonomy in the weekly adjustment of their rate control medication. In order to guide medication adjustment by patients, the research team will filter and simplify the information received by HM before sending it to patients. It is hypothesize that patient empowerment, understanding the dynamics of their heart rates in relation to the amount of medication used, will lead to better heart rate control, and it will improve the daily hours of patients activity.
This study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of using cryoballoon ablation comparing with anti-arrhythmic drug therapy as initial treatment for naive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze electroanatomical data collected during persistent atrial fibrillation ablation procedures, combined with pre-ablation cardiac CT data, in order to: - define a new method for quantifying left atrial voltage in atrial fibrillation via a total energy map instead of a peak-to-peak amplitude map - confirm the association between epicardial fat localization and atrial conduction slowing
Rationale: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly prevalent cardiac arrhythmia. AF is classified as paroxysmal or persistent AF, based on the duration and persistency of the arrhythmia. Despite state-of-the-art pharmacological therapies targeting the ventricular rate or aiming to restore sinus rhythm, many patients with persistent AF stay symptomatic. Catheter ablation, endocardial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in particular, is the most commonly applied approach to treat drug refractory persistent AF, but particularly in this patient group results are modest. Alternatively, the PVs can be approached epicardially by thoracoscopic surgery to isolate the PVs. This approach is more efficacious, at the cost of a more invasive procedure and longer hospital stay. However, no studies have been conducted comparing catheter with thoracoscopic ablation in patients with persistent AF as a primary invasive procedure after failing treatment with anti-arrhythmic medication. Objective: This current study aims to assess a patient specific therapy plan for patients with persistent AF by randomizing thoracoscopic versus catheter ablation for PVI without adjuvant substrate ablation in those patients. Study design: This is a prospective, non-blinded randomized multicenter study. Subjects will be randomized (1:1) to one of the two study-arms (thoracoscopic surgical or catheter PVI). The follow-up will last 5 years, with heart rhythm monitoring at three and six months, one year and yearly in the following years. In case AF recurs during the first year, the subject will receive the treatment of the otherother arm, or according to patient choice or clinical routine. Study population: Patients with an indication for invasive treatment of persistent AF. Intervention: Thoracoscopic surgical or catheter PVI without additional lesions.
The present prospective cohort study (not randomized) analyses the value of screening and treatment of SAHS in the management of patients with AF refractory to antiarrhythmics drugs, potentially candidates for ablation. Patients at low risk of suffering from SAHS will follow conventional management of their AF, according to the usual criteria of the Arrhythmia Unit. Patients with high or intermediate risk of SAHS, will undergo respiratory polygraphy. If the result is positive, they will be treated as standard for this syndrome and their heart rate will be monitored for 3 months. After this, the patient's arrhythmic load will be reevaluated differentiating patients into two groups, those that must be ablated from those that have improved their condition and the clinical criteria is no longer ablation but follow-up.
The purpose of this study is to collect data on laser ballon (2nd gen) systems for catheter ablation for AF, in order to determine the safety and the efficacy of this technique. Moreover, the investigators aim to determine the short and long term outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation evaluating arrhythmia recurrence, especially using continuous rhythm monitoring with implantable loop recorders (ILR).