View clinical trials related to Arthroscopy.
Filter by:This study aims to compare PENG block and LV-ISBP block in the incidence of phrenic nerve block, duration of postoperative analgesia, time to first analgesic request (VAS > 30 mm), pain scores, and side effects.
The investigators's aim is to examine trunk and upper extremity edema after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and/or labrum repair surgeries. During surgery, the shoulder joint capsule is cut and the joint is entered arthroscopically. During this procedure, approximately 3-6 liters of saline fluid is injected into the joint, depending on the duration of the surgery. The given fluid accumulates out of the joint in relation to the duration of the surgery and the amount of fluid given. In this study, the investigators aim is to examine how much the extra-articular fluid collects under the skin of the upper extremity and trunk, and the change in the amount of fluid 24 hours after surgery. Examination of the amount of subcutaneous fluid may help to better understand the postoperative complications such as edema, carpal tunnel syndrome, compartment syndrome, myolysis, and dyspnea. How much edema the joint and surrounding structures are exposed to and its relationship with the duration of surgery can help to clinicians determine the safe discharge time.
Anterior shoulder dislocations occur when the humeral head translates anterior to the glenoid cause pain, stiffness, and glenoid bone loss. If left untreated, the risk of recurrence can be up to or greater than 90%. The only surgically modifiable factor to reduce the risk of recurrence is the glenoid bone loss (GBL), where surgeons have the ability to recreate the shape of the glenoid and reduce the risk of recurrent shoulder dislocations. Established boney procedures for shoulder instability include the Latarjet and free bone block procedures, such as the Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction (AGR). The Latarjet is well known for its lower rate of recurrent instability, but raises concerns due to under-appreciated complications rates. The AGR is a newer surgical approach that has garnered attention for its low rate of recurrent instability and complication profile. Both treatments can reduce pain, increase function following surgery and reduce the risk of recurrent instability. However, these two established approaches have yet to be directly compared and studied on a larger scale. The purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes pre- and post-operatively between the Latarjet to the AGR.
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of ESPB versus ISB in anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopy
To find superiority relationship between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid on peroperative and postoperative blood loss, haemarthrosis prevalence and improvement functional prognosis in anterior cruciate ligament arthroscopy.
Objective: To study the clinical effect of anatomical reconstruction of the posterolateral structure of the knee joint under arthroscopy. Methods: The patients who were admitted to hospital for the treatment of posterolateral structural injuries of the knee joint, including those with other ligament injuries (combined with anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries and medial collateral ligament injuries) were subjected to arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterolateral structures. Carry out preoperative and postoperative evaluations, and conduct preoperative and postoperative comparative studies to clarify the clinical effect of the procedure. Expected results: The anatomical reconstruction technique of the posterolateral structure of the knee joint under arthroscopy may effectively restore the stability and motor function of the knee joint. Expected conclusion: Arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the posterolateral structure of the knee is an effective minimally invasive technique.
The primary objective of this randomized pilot study is to evaluate whether subchondroplasty combined with knee arthroscopy is more effective at reducing knee pain and improving knee function compared to knee arthroscopy alone. All knee function outcomes will be assessed at initial presentation, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months following surgery using validated questionnaires. Patient-reported pain will also be recorded at 2 weeks after surgery. The secondary objective of the study is to determine whether the subchondroplasty and knee arthroscopy group has better bone quality and bone micro-architecture compared to the group receiving knee arthroscopy alone. Bone quality/micro-architecture will be evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months following surgery using Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) imaging and at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery using X-rays.
Aim of the study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergone all-arthroscopic autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis for symptomatic osteochondral talar lesions