View clinical trials related to Arthroscopy.
Filter by:Objective: To study the clinical effect of anatomical reconstruction of the posterolateral structure of the knee joint under arthroscopy. Methods: The patients who were admitted to hospital for the treatment of posterolateral structural injuries of the knee joint, including those with other ligament injuries (combined with anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries and medial collateral ligament injuries) were subjected to arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterolateral structures. Carry out preoperative and postoperative evaluations, and conduct preoperative and postoperative comparative studies to clarify the clinical effect of the procedure. Expected results: The anatomical reconstruction technique of the posterolateral structure of the knee joint under arthroscopy may effectively restore the stability and motor function of the knee joint. Expected conclusion: Arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the posterolateral structure of the knee is an effective minimally invasive technique.
This study describes the changes in preference to arthroscopic surgery in two orthopedics departments in Denmark under the COVID-19 pandemic.
A prospective study, with outcomes including re-rupture rate and return to sport will be collected following ACL reconstruction. In keeping with the surgeon's standard practice, patients 24 years and under that are skeletally mature, will receive a quad tendon autograft; patients 25 years of age and over will receive an allograft All-Inside ACL reconstruction. These two cohorts will then be randomized into two groups, one with bone marrow/DBM and InternalBrace augmentation, and one without. The study procedures will involve use of x-rays, MRI, CT scan, and surveys at varying time points to assess radiographic, imaging and clinical outcomes.
the aim is to compare the effects of two different doses of intraarticular ketamine on postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements.in knee artroscopy
Protocol synopsis Title of Study: A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Q-Fix All-Suture Anchor in Arthroscopic Repair of Shoulder Soft Tissue in Chinese Patients Study Design: Prospective, multicenter, comparative, randomized, concurrent control Study Type: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Study Product: Q-Fix All-Suture Anchor Comparison Group Twinfix Ti Suture Anchor Study Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Q-Fix All-suture Anchor in patients requiring the repair of soft tissue of shoulder who receive the arthroscopic repair of soft tissue using Q-Fix All-suture Anchor, when compared with the patients receiving the treatment with Twinfix Ti Suture Anchor. The result of this trial will be used for the Q-Fix All-suture Anchor registration in China. Primary Objective: The primary objective of this study is to confirm that the clinical outcome of subjects receiving the treatment with Q-Fix All-suture Anchor is non-inferior to that of the subjects receiving the treatment with Twinfix Ti Suture Anchor during the same period, at 6 months after the repair of soft tissue of shoulder, taking the mean Constant score as efficacy endpoint. Secondary Objective(s): The secondary objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Q-Fix All-suture Anchor at 12 months after repair of soft tissue of shoulder. Statistical Rationale: The primary efficacy endpoint of this study is Constant score at 6 months after operation. The non-inferiority testing is performed for efficiency of primary efficacy endpoint; the test hypothesis is as follows: Invalid hypothesis: H0: μ1-μ2 ≤ -δ Alternative hypothesis: H1: μ1-μ2 > -δ Where, μ1 and μ2 are the mean Constant scores in the test and control group, respectively. δ is the non-inferiority margin, which is set to 10. The hypothesis will be tested by two-sided t-test at the alpha level of α=0.025 (one-tailed test). the A non-inferior test will be conducted on the Constant scores in the test and control groups. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between two groups will be calculated. If the lower limit of 95%CI for the efficiency difference between two groups is greater than -9, it is considered that the test group is non-inferior to the control group. Sample Size: 128 (64 in each group) Number of Study Sites: Approximate 5 clinical sites Targeted Global Regions: China
The primary objective of this randomized pilot study is to evaluate whether subchondroplasty combined with knee arthroscopy is more effective at reducing knee pain and improving knee function compared to knee arthroscopy alone. All knee function outcomes will be assessed at initial presentation, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months following surgery using validated questionnaires. Patient-reported pain will also be recorded at 2 weeks after surgery. The secondary objective of the study is to determine whether the subchondroplasty and knee arthroscopy group has better bone quality and bone micro-architecture compared to the group receiving knee arthroscopy alone. Bone quality/micro-architecture will be evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months following surgery using Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) imaging and at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery using X-rays.
To record the digital data from monitoring instruments (standard patient monitor) containing cardiovascular system information, and from depth-of-anesthesia monitoring modules (Bispectral index, Entropy module, Surgical Plethysmography Index, Analgesia Nociception Index) containing neurological system information captured in the patient monitor, as well as the physiological data regarding anesthetic dosage, respiratory gas analysis and the standard monitoring requirement of anesthesia. The investigators also record the precise time points of detail surgical steps during the shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Clinical data collected from these monitoring instrument will be used to gain more understanding of the complex interaction between anesthetic effect, surgical procedure, autonomic response and drug modeling. The goal is to obtain the performance of each monitoring index in detail surgical steps.
This proposal aims to measure the quality of recovery and quality of pain management after shoulder surgery before and after implementation of a multimodal pain protocol.
Aim of the study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergone all-arthroscopic autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis for symptomatic osteochondral talar lesions
The investigators use existing resources to carry out this new technology, in accord with the standard of the patients, were randomized to traditional fracture balloon tibia fixation or arthroscopic reduction under angioplasty, the original data and data acquisition in a certain period of time corresponding to the patient, through statistical and epidemiological analysis and comparison of the method of professional data analysis discussion and experience according to the analysis results, the balloon angioplasty tibial arthroscopy and traditional open reduction and internal fixation for the clinical differences between postoperative recovery of tibial plateau articular surface reduction and joint function, and feedback the results to guide the clinical diagnosis and treatment.