View clinical trials related to Arthritis.
Filter by:This research work proposes the evaluation of the implementation of a tele-orientation program and tele-consultation to the adult population with RA attended at a specialized rheumatology center in Bogota, Colombia, over a period of three months, by means of a observational, analytical, cohort, prospective study that will include mixed methods for collecting information (quantitative and qualitative)
Studying the effect of laser acupuncture on geriatric patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of arthritis (swelling and stiffness in the joints) that is frequently seen in trial participants who also have the skin condition psoriasis. It is caused by the body's immune system mistakenly attacking healthy joint tissue causing inflammation, joint damage, disability, and a reduced life expectancy. The main objective of this study is to characterize attainment of minimal disease activity (MDA) at week 24 under continuous treatment with upadacitinib in participants with oligo- or polyarticular PsA as part of real-world practice. Upadacitinib is a drug approved for the treatment of Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Germany and Canada. Approximately 380 adult participants with PsA at multiple sites in Germany and Canada. Participants will receive oral Upadacitinib tablets per current local label, according to local standard of care and international guidelines. There may be a higher burden for participants in this study compared to standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits per routine clinical practice. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects, and by questionnaire.
Among three MAPK families, paroxetine was found to be able to decrease the phosphorylation of ERK. It was reported that paroxetine attenuates the symptoms of collage induced arthritis rats due to its inhibitory effect on T cell activation and infiltration to synovial tissue via suppression of ERK pathway. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of paroxetine in rheumatoid arthritis. Paroxetine prevents the joint inflammation which is at the very early stage. paroxetine could inhibit GRK2 with selectivity over other GRKs. Medications developed for maintaining the immunologic equilibrium. such as GRK2 inhibitors, will be the novel trends in RA treatment that could avoid the adverse side effects that are common with current treatment options.
Rationale: Psoriatic (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are inflammatory joint diseases that often involve the wrist and may result in progressive joint destruction followed by impaired wrist function and reduced quality of life. The first line treatment usually consists of conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) along with bridging therapy using systemic corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids in case of limited joint disease. After initiation therapy, intra-articular corticosteroids are often utilized as they provide rapid dampening of joint inflammation in case of a flare-up of disease activity (mono- or oligoarthritis). However, a substantial part of these patients clinically respond poorly or not at all. Alternatively, arthroscopic synovectomy may provide substantial relieve of symptoms, improve functionality, slow down disease progression and prevent joint destruction, as earlier studies have suggested. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings. Moreover, they may prevent the need for expensive biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) and assist in guiding therapeutic strategies in the long run, through collecting and analysing valuable synovial biopsies. Wrist arthroscopy is a routine procedure in the participating centres with only minor complications and fast recovery. Objective: To compare arthroscopic synovectomy with deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (DIACS) versus intra-articular injection of corticosteroids (IACSI) in RA and PsA patients with mono- or oligoarthritis of the wrist that is refractory to cDMARD therapy. Study design: Multi-centre randomized controlled trial conducted in the Maasstad Hospital and Spijkenisse Medisch Centrum (SMC). Study population: Patients with active RA or PsA and bDMARD-naive, who develop a localized flare of disease activity (mono- or oligoarthritis) that involves the wrist, defined as an increase in DAS28 > 1.2 or > 0.6 if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 compared to the last DAS28 measurement (maximum six months before) and that is refractory to systemic cDMARD for at least three months, defined as no response on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Intervention: This study will randomize between IACSI of the wrist (control) and arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist combined with DIACS (intervention). During arthroscopy synovial biopsies will be collected and stored for later analysis of the functional and histological characteristics of the synovium (beyond the scope of this study). Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the change in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score from randomization to three months of follow-up. The PRWE is a validated, fifteen-item self-reported questionnaire rating wrist pain and function. Secondary outcomes are resolution of wrist arthritis measured by ultrasound, standard wrist radiographs, DAS28, EULAR response rate, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ), cost effectiveness analyses (CEA), physical examination, adverse events (AE) and laboratory results. Follow-up visits are scheduled at three, six and twelve months after intervention. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with study participation: Both study arms include standard treatment of care. Wrist arthroscopy is a standard treatment for wrist arthritis and often implemented for other intra-articular wrist pathology. The risks include infection, neurovascular damage and articular surface damage. Nevertheless, wrist arthroscopy is a well-established and safe technique. Reduction of risks will be done according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. If complications arise, the treating physician will proportionate the adequate treatment according to the current protocols based on the published literature. Patients will be asked to return at three, six and twelve months. These visits are standard of care following the rheumatic arthritis protocol. Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline and at three follow-up moments. These will take 160 minutes in total. The arthroscopy group will return between ten to fourteen days for wound inspection. All patient will be contacted by telephone at two, four and six weeks for VAS pain scores. Expected results: We expect that arthroscopic synovectomy followed by DIACS will lead to significantly more improvement in PRWE scores compared to IACSI three months after intervention. Furthermore, we anticipate that wrist arthroscopy will result in lower pain scores, better joint mobility, better response on EULAR score, sustained resolution of arthritis on ultrasound, less joint damage on radiographs and is more cost-effective after one-year analysis.
It is a prospective case-control study with women diagnosed early rheumatoid arthritis. Three therapeutic failures were considered: failure 1 - to the first Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (methotrexate); failure 2 - to the second DMARDs (leflunomide) and failure 3 - to the first immunobiological drugs (adalimumab). Ultrasound was performed bilaterally on the 2nd and 3rd metacarpophalangeal joints (MCFs), proximal interphalangeal joints (IFPs), and wrists (US10). Ultrasound measurements (qualitative and semi-quantitative) evaluated: 1 - inflammatory: synovial and tenosynovial proliferation in gray scale and power Doppler (0-3); 2 - joint damage: bone erosion (qualitative and semi-quantitative) and cartilage damage (qualitative and semi-quantitative). Clinical and laboratory variables were also assessed blindly at baseline and after 12, 24 e 48 weeks.
This study learn how easily patients can use an educational tool that will be created for patients with melanoma and pre-existing autoimmune diseases who receive or will receive immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs. Patients will be asked their opinions about the design, accessibility, and content of the tool. Researchers will use the information collected to improve the educational materials that will help patients make future decisions about their treatment.
European recommendations indicate to start a conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) as soon as possible to reach the remission in early RA or low disease activity in established RA. If the target is not achieved with the first csDMARD and in presence of poor prognostic, addition of a biologic (b)DMARD or a targeted synthetic (ts)DMARD should be considered . Nevertheless, as many as one-third of patients have persistent disease activity and insufficient (inadequate) response to a first b/tsDMARD according to international recommendations. This relatively long time (3 to 6 months) between treatment initiation and determination of individual clinical response represents: - a risk for the patient who could be usually exposed to potential side effects, - a loss of chance for the patient who will not receive an adequate treatment during the most favorable period and thus may develop irreversible lesions - a cost for the healthcare system, especially in terms of expensive drug reimbursements, notwithstanding the increasing use of biosimilars. Despite 20 years of research, no biomarker or no way are available in the daily practice to predict disease activity and the non-response to a b/tDMARD [11]. Thus exploration of a new approach is totally in purpose. The aim of this project is to benefit from the declarative PRO (Patient Reported Outcomes), the physical activity and sleep quality to predict the individual clinical response to the b/tsDMARDs
In a previous exploratory study, the investigators observed an effect on disease activity outcomes of anti-inflammatory diet. The investigators also observed change in microbiome and circulating metabolites. The current study will determine whether or not the addition of anti-inflammatory diet improves the clinical outcomes in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, and the role of microbiome and circulating metabolites.
The objective of this study is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in robotic-arm assisted TKA using mechanical alignment (MA TKA) versus robotic-arm assisted TKA with functional alignment (FA TKA). Both FA TKA and MA TKA are performed through similar skin incisions, robotic-guidance, and use identical implants. In MA TKA, bone is prepared and implants positioned to ensure that that the overall alignment of the leg is in neutral. In FA TKA, the bone is prepared and implants positioned to restore the natural alignment of the patient's leg. Both of these surgical techniques provide excellent outcomes in TKA but it is not known which of the two techniques is better for patient recovery. Mako robotic-assisted TKA is an established treatment for arthritis of the knee joint. The positions of the implants and overall alignment of the leg are important as they influence how quickly the implants wear out and need replacing. The aim of this study is to determine if patient recovery is better with functionally aligned Mako robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (FA TKA) or mechanically aligned Mako robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (MA TKA)