View clinical trials related to Arthritis.
Filter by:The primary objective of this research is to establish a well characterized clinical and longitudinal cohort for individuals with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Myositis to create a place to maintain blood, urine, stool specimens, excess tissue from procedures, and clinical data, which may be accessed for future research purposes. Specific research objectives of this cohort include: 1. Observe the response that immunosuppressive medications have on the immune cell population and cytokines in individuals with RA or Myositis. 2. Observe the role that the intestinal microbiome has on the immune cell population and cytokines in individuals with RA or Myositis. 3. Observe the connection between intestinal inflammation has on the immune cell population and cytokines in individuals with RA or Myositis.
This is an open-label study to evaluate the effects of bimekizumab in patients with psoriasis vulgaris and who also have active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
SYBRA is an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled clinical trial that aims to assess the use of synovial biopsies in predicting response to biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that have failed disease-modifying drugs. The project has the potential to help change the current practice by offering the best treatment option. The decision to choose the best treatment for a particular patient is especially important in the context of the growing number of therapies available as a first-line option and the lack of specific biomarkers to predict response to treatment.
This study will assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles of otilimab in healthy Japanese participants.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of GS-5718 versus placebo for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as measured by change from baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on 28 joints using C-reactive protein (CRP) (DAS28[CRP]) at Week 12.
32 patients with Eaton-Glickel stage 2-3 CMC arthritis will be randomized to receive intraarticular MFAT or intraarticular corticosteroid injection. Patients with inflammatory arthritis or prior thumb base trauma or surgery will be excluded. Autologous adipose tissue will be harvested from the outer thigh or lower abdomen using local anesthesia. Tissue will be processed to remove oil and debris in-office using an FDA-approved commercially available device. The processed adipose will be immediately injected into the thumb CMC joint under fluoroscopic guidance. Visual analogue score (VAS), grip/pinch strength, Kapandji range of motion score, thumb disability examination, and QuickDASH score will be assessed pre-procedure and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
A unicompartmental (partial) knee replacement (UKR) is the removal of one part of the knee joint (a condyle), that has become damaged due to osteoarthritis, and replacing it with an artificial implant. The placement of these artificial implants and how they are aligned with each other is important because they can impact overall knee function and the long-term survival of the implant. A UKR is a highly effective, recognised procedure for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis affecting one compartment of the knee joint. The functional outcomes following UKA are at a minimum of equivalence to total knee arthroplasty procedures, with some recent literature demonstrating improved functional patient reported outcome scores. There have been significant developments in knee replacement surgery over recent years. In particular, the introduction of robotic surgical systems, such as the NAVIO and CORI systems (Smith+Nephew Plc). These systems are hand-held devices which can support the surgeon with the knee replacement procedure, the systems are image-free and do not require the patient to undergo any scans (such as CT scans). Comparisons of robotic systems to conventional instruments have demonstrated that robotic platforms produce fewer positioning errors in total knee replacement. This can result in more precise knee alignment and better outcomes following surgery. With both the NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems there is a reduction in radiation exposure due to them being image-free. At present, there is some evidence available for the long-term outcomes of knee replacement implanted using robotic assistance (i.e. 2-10 years) however this study is designed to look at the early outcomes following UKR. There is no literature to date to show that robotic-assisted UKR is superior to conventional methods, within the early post-operative period (up to 12 months). This study is designed to show that the NAVIO/CORI surgical systems are better than conventional methods for UKR. The hypothesis is that they will be cost-effective, will reduce the time a patient spends in hospital following their surgery, will improve patient satisfaction during the early recovery period and will improve the patient's early post-operative mobility and function.
A total knee replacement is the removal of parts of the knee joint, that have become damaged due to osteoarthritis, and replacing these with artificial implants. The placement of these artificial implants and how they are aligned with each other is important because they can impact overall knee function and the long-term survival of the implant. It is reported that up to 34% of all patients following total knee replacement (TKR) have poor outcomes functionally. There have been significant developments in knee replacement surgery over recent years. In particular, the introduction of robotic surgical systems, such as the NAVIO and CORI systems (Smith+Nephew Plc). The NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems are hand-held devices which can support the surgeon with the knee replacement procedure, the systems are image-free and do not require the patient to undergo any scans (such as CT scans). During the surgery, the surgeon uses the NAVIO/CORI hand-held device to map specific landmarks within the knee joint and determines the desired alignment using associated computer software. The tools to remove the bone and place the implants are controlled by the surgeon with the guidance of the NAVIO/CORI software. Comparisons of robotic systems to conventional instruments have demonstrated that robotic platforms produce fewer positioning errors in total knee replacement. This can result in more precise knee alignment and better outcomes following surgery. With both the NAVIO and CORI Surgical Systems there is a reduction in radiation exposure due to them being image-free. At present, there is some evidence available for the long-term outcomes of total knee replacement implanted using robotic assistance (i.e. 2-10 years) however this study is designed to look at the early outcomes following TKR. There is no literature to date to show that robotic-assisted TKR is superior to conventional methods, within the early post-operative period (up to 12 months). This study is designed to show that the NAVIO/CORI surgical systems are better than conventional methods for TKR. The hypothesis is that they will be cost-effective, will reduce the time a patient spends in hospital following their surgery, will improve patient satisfaction during the early recovery period and will improve the patient's early post-operative mobility and function.
The objective of this study is to investigate the functional and clinical outcome after medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the Aesculap AG Univation X knee prosthesis compared to pre-operative data and a healthy control group.
Inflamed joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis are characterized by low oxygen levels and inflammation. We propose to investigate whether tiny bubbles (nanobubbles) when given in a drink can alter oxygen level in joints. These nanobubbles are so small that they can enter the bloodstream when given as a drink. This information will give new information on the role of oxygen in joint inflammation and could possibly lead to new treatment approaches in the future.