View clinical trials related to Arthritis.
Filter by:In this study, every patient with cancer who is going to be treated by immunotherapy will fill in a form. In this form, we try to determine if he presents rheumatologic complications of his immunotherapy. If the patient answers yes to one question on the form, the patient will be see in rheumatologic consultation to explore his clinical signs. The number of patients referred in consultation thanks to this questionnaire will be compared to the number of patients who would have been spontaneously referred by the oncologist. The aim of this questionnaire is to optimise the management of rheumatological effects secondary to immunotherapy.
The primary goal of Total Hip Replacement (THR) surgery in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis is to reduce pain and restore hip function in order to increase patient mobility and quality of life. Two different cement fixation methods are used in order to insert THR implants. This will be done before and after surgery in 2 groups randomized to either of 2 cement fixation methods. Gait analysis preoperative and 2 year after surgery.
Surgical excisional debridement is the mainstay of management in septic arthritis with necessary decompression, lavage, debridement, and partial synovectomy. However, there has been considerable debate over the optimal modality. Most surgeons perform an open arthrotomy or arthroscopic debridement, although serial aspiration can be considered as an option in very limited circumstances with patients who cannot tolerate surgery. While open arthrotomy has been often utilized, there has been an increasing number of proponents for arthroscopic treatment citing lower re-infection rates and better functional outcomes. However, there has been a lack of well-designed prospective studies comparing surgical treatment modalities for native knee septic arthritis. The goals of this present study are to determine if arthroscopic management of septic arthritis in the native knee resulted in a lower number of surgeries and a shorter length of stay compared to open arthrotomy. Secondary outcomes included differences in postoperative pain and improvements in Lysholm knee scores.
The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy of a novel sustained dynamic compression intramedullary nail for tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis.
The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy of a novel dynamic sustained compression intramedullary nail for subtalar (talocalcaneal) arthrodesis.
Several studies have shown the relevance of the IL6 level before treatment or after 6 months, as a predictive biomarker for the persistence of remission. The IL6 assay is now routinely available using the instruments available at the Montpellier University Hospital and with reagents provided by the ROCHE Laboratory. Moreover medical practices should incorporate this parameter. However, relevant threshold shlould be defined before being able to integrate biomarkers such as IL6 for monitoring bDMARDs in an algorithm. The medical staff of Clinical Immunology Unit has decided to include the dosage of IL-6 during a routine biological assessment during patient visit to follow the new EULAR recommendations . This measument will be perfom in addition to the CRP and biochemical parameters on subjects with active RA or in remission upon the introduction of biological treatments or JAKi or during remission after at least 6 months of treatment. From March to July 2021, 200 patients will beenrolled and will benefit of this assessement. The investigators will retrospectively define clinical correlations with serum IL6 levels in order to define a threshold. In the second stage, a decisional algorithm based on the results of this project will be create. This will allow an improvement of the medical practices thanks to the integrationof of serum IL6 dosage as a standard during patients visits. The IL-6 assay will be performed on the e801 module of the Cobas lines (Roche Diagnostics) currently in place in the Biochemistry and Hormonology laboratory. The Elecsys® IL-6 - Roche Diagnostics test, high sensitivity, is an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.
A phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel group, Sing-dose study to compare the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of CMAB008 and Remicade in healthy subjects.
Patients having juvenile idiopathic arthritis (according to ILAR criteria) with hip arthritis were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 received hip denervation and group 2 controlled and received a subcutaneous injection of saline, and group 3 received intra-articular triamcinolone. Outcome measures included pain, tenderness, range of motion, SOLAR, HARISS score. These outcomes were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, and 16 weeks
There are two main aims of this study. First aim is to compare the risk of cardiovascular events (including myocardial infarction or stroke), between patients treated with tofacitinib and patients treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) among, 1) "real world evidence (RWE)" cohorts including routine care patient population from the US and, 2) "Randomized controlled trial (RCT) DUPLICATE" cohorts including routine care patient population who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Safety Study Of Tofacitinib Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitor In Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis ("ORAL Surveillance", NCT02092467) clinical trial. Second aim is to examine the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality as separate endpoints when comparing tofacitinib with TNFi in patients with RA among, 1) "real world evidence (RWE)" cohort including routine care patient population from the US and, 2) "Randomized controlled trial (RCT) DUPLICATE" cohort including routine care patient population who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Safety Study Of Tofacitinib Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitor In Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis ("ORAL Surveillance", NCT02092467) clinical trial.
The H3 TAR Prosthesis was approved by FDA (P160036) on June 4, 2019. Continued approval of the premarket approval application (PMA) is contingent upon the submission of periodic reports (Annual Report), required under 21 CFR 814.84. In order to provide continued reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the PMA device, data from this post-approval study must be submitted to FDA in a PMA Post-Approval Study Report per the requirements set forth in the approval.