View clinical trials related to Arthritis.
Filter by:Prospective Post-Market Clinical Follow up study according to MEDDEV 2.12/2 rev2 of the European Union. Patients receiving the primary knee implant BPK-S UC as primary implant in either variant ceramic or CoCr (metal) are eligible for the study and will be followed up for 5 years after implantation or until revision of the prosthesis, whichever occurs first. Demographic data will be collected together with data regarding safety and benefit at defined timepoints (preoperative, intraoperative and at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after implantation). Patients will be divided in 2 cohorts (ceramic and metal) and stratified by age.
In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) the clinical response to anti-TNFα is related to an increase in the number or in the function of Treg lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of patients. This observation suggests the central role of Tregs in homeostasis of the immune response during RA. In the literature the Tregs frequency and phenotype in the peripheral blood are well documented, however the analyses done on the Tregs in inflamed environment are still fragmentary or disparate. In this project Tregs phenotype as well as expression of several transcripts will be analysed in order to better characterize the Treg cell subsets within the synovial fluid. Moreover, the local inflammatory cytokines (TNF, IL-6 and IL-1) may affect both the phenotype and the suppressive function of these Tregs and a comparison between peripheral and tissue Tregs will allow us to better understand the cause of functional loss. Outcomes: Primary outcome: Identification and characterization of the Tregs subpopulation present in the synovial fluid for RA patients suffering an episode of acute arthritis. Secondary outcomes: compare the phenotypic and expression profile of the Tregs present in the synovial fluid with the Tregs present in the peripheral blood of RA patients suffering from an episode of acute arthritis.
A post market, prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, open-label, clinical study using survivorship as the reference performance goal to study the safety and efficacy of the Titan Modular Shoulder System 2.5 when used for primary shoulder arthroplasty.
This study will evaluate the long term performance and safety data for the Cadence™ Total Ankle System (CTAS) when used for primary arthroplasty in patients with primary arthritis (e.g. degenerative disease), secondary arthritis (e.g. post-traumatic, avascular necrosis, if minimally 2/3 of the talus is preserved), and systemic arthritis of the ankle (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, hemochromatosis)
A post market, non-randomized, multi-center, open-label,clinical study using survivorship to study the safety and efficacy of the Integra® TITAN™ Total Shoulder System 1.0 (TAS) when used for total shoulder arthroplasty.
This is a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled interventional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in 20 patients with new onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). The study is a single dose, phase I clinical trial and is the first time that this product will be infused in RA patients. The study duration is approximately fourteen months from time of screening to completion. Research hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that when administered therapeutically, MSCs will induce healthy immune responses and will reduce RA disease activity. This study is primarily focused on demonstrating the safety of this approach.
This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, safety, tolerability and efficacy of JHL1101 versus MabThera in subjects with moderate to severe RA who have previously failed at least 1 tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitor (i.e., intolerance or documented active disease despite at least 12 weeks treatment according to the TNF inhibitor-approved treatment and dosage), and are on concomitant treatment with MTX.
To compare the efficacy of switching to a different molecular target (from TNF to IL6) versus cycling to a second TNF inhibitor in patients with active RA, who have not adequately responded to a previous treatment with a first anti-TNF.
This is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical study of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar drug Ritumax® compared to original drug MabThera® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, receiving stable doses of Methotrexate. At Week -2, after signing the Patient Information Sheet and Informed Consent Form, patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving stable doses of Methotrexate (10-25 mg per week orally or parenterally) will pass screening procedures. Patients meeting all the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be invited to the investigational site for Visit 2 (Week 0) to be randomized into one of two treatment arms: - Ritumax® 1000 mg х 2 intravenous infusions - MabThera® 1000 mg х 2 intravenous infusions After being assigned to the treatment arm patients will receive a course of study treatment, including two i/v infusions at 14-day interval: at Week 0 and Week 2. After that, patients will be followed up for the next 22 weeks. Safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters will be monitored at this visits.
The goal of this study is to analyze patient:provider communication surrounding the discussion of difficult clinical conversations such as knee replacement options. This study will also examine how using the teach-back communication technique can improve communication between patients and providers. Orthopedic residents, fellows, physician assistants, and attendings that agree to participate will be consented. Patients, who are likely to engage in a difficult clinical conversation, such as those who have a clinical indication for a Total Knee Replacement or a Partial Knee Replacement, will be recruited from participating providers clinical schedules. Patient:provider interactions will be recorded and then the providers will attend a 1 hour education lecture about how to use teach-back. After attending the lecture, additional patient:provider interactions will be recorded and analyzed via a qualitative approach. Additionally, providers will participate in a semi-structured interview to capture their perceptions of teach-back and what challenges and benefits they may derive from using it.