Comparison of a CrossBoss First Versus Standard Wire Escalation Strategy

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

CrossBoss First is a single-blind randomized controlled trial that will randomize 246 patients undergoing clinically-indicated Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, to upfront use of the CrossBoss catheter vs. antegrade guidewire escalation strategy The "CrossBoss First" study has two primary objectives. The primary efficacy objective is to compare the procedure time required to cross the CTO or abort the procedure with a CrossBoss first vs. antegrade wire escalation strategy. The investigators hypothesize that upfront use of the CrossBoss catheter will be associated with shorter procedure time required for CTO crossing compared with an antegrade wire escalation strategy.

The primary safety objective is to compare the frequency of procedural major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with upfront use of CrossBoss vs. a guidewire escalation strategy. The investigators hypothesize that upfront use of the CrossBoss catheter will be associated with similar incidence of MACE compared with an antegrade wire escalation strategy.

The secondary endpoints are: (1) technical and procedural success4-6; (2) total procedure time (defined as the interval between administration of local anesthesia for obtaining vascular access and removal of the last catheter); (3) fluoroscopy time to cross the CTO and total fluoroscopy time; (4) total air kerma radiation exposure; (5) total contrast volume; and (6) number of wires, microcatheters, balloons, and stents used.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02510547
Study type	Interventional
Source	North Texas Veterans Healthcare System
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	September 2015
Completion date	August 2017

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT06030596` - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed	`NCT04080700` - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting	`NCT03810599` - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06002932` - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06032572` - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05308719` - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04242134` - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions	N/A
Completed	`NCT04556994` - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05846893` - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06027788` - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05023629` - STunning After Balloon Occlusion	N/A
Completed	`NCT04941560` - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed	`NCT04006288` - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT01860274` - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06174090` - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT03968809` - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Terminated	`NCT03959072` - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting	`NCT05065073` - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT04566497` - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.	N/A
Completed	`NCT05096442` - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions	N/A

Comparison of a CrossBoss First Versus Standard Wire Escalation Strategy for Crossing Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: the "CrossBoss First" Trial

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms