View clinical trials related to Arterial Occlusive Diseases.
Filter by:The study is aimed at assessing the role of the activity of markers of endothelial dysfunction (cytotoxic malonic aldehyde (MDA), angiotensin II, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NO), endothelin-1, prostacyclin) in the systemic circulation in patients with lower extremity atherosclerotic arterial occlusive disease undergoing open reconstructive interventions.
Several studies have demonstrated that simultaneous treatment with two stentrievers (STs) as rescue treatment is very effective, with high recanalization rates even in this group of patients where other revascularization techniques have failed. There has been no observed increase in hemorrhagic complications. Recently, a prospective study has been published where treatment with two ST has been shown to be effective and safe if used as a first-choice treatment (not as rescue) with a successful recanalization rate (eTICI 2c/3) after the first pass of 69%. These results have been reinforced after the publication of a randomized study that confirms, in vitro, the superiority of using two ST over one.
The CMOSS-2 trial is a government-funded, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. It will recruit symptomatic chronic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in patients with severe hemodynamic insufficiency. Only high-volume center with a proven track record will be included. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to best medical treatment alone or medical treatment plus bypass surgery. Primary outcome is ischemic stroke in the territory of the target artery within 24 months after randomization.
The aim of the present study is an evaluation, whether an immobilization of the upper extremity by means of a positioning splint can help to reduce the incidence of local complications after transbrachial puncture for peripheral arterial interventions, or not.
To assess the effect of endovascular thrombectomy alone compared to intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion patients within 4.5 hours from onset on efficacy and safety outcomes.
The CVT-SFA Trial investigates the inhibition of restenosis using the CVT Everolimus-coated PTA Catheter in the treatment of de-novo occluded/ stenotic or re-occluded/restenotic superficial femoral or popliteal arteries.
To assess the effect of intravenous tenecteplase plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) compared to EVT alone on 4.5 to 24 hours after stroke due to basilar artery occlusion.
In this proposal, the investigators will demonstrate the feasibility and noninferiority of telerobotic ultrasonography as compared to traditional manual acquisition in performing a limited carotid Duplex examination and in carotid plaque detection.
The purpose of this clinical study is to compare how well two different devices achieve hemostasis in patients undergoing a transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Both devices are approved by the FDA for this use, and have already been used by clinicians on patients undergoing transfemoral procedures. It is believed that the use of both devices in combination compared to the Perclose alone will shorten the time that it takes to 'seal' the artery, resulting in a shorter period of time that manual pressure will be held, shorter procedure time and less complications after the procedure.
Two recent randomized controlled trials (BAOCHE and ATTENTION) have confirmed the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy in patient with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, it is still inconclusive whether there is any differences between endovascular therapy with or without bridging intravenous thrombolysis in acute BAO. So far, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted specifically for endovascular therapy with or without intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke due to BAO. Therefore, this study plans to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the functional outcomes between endovascular therapy with and without intravenous thrombolysis in patient with AIS due to BAO. This study is a multicenter, parallel, open label, randomized controlled trial comparing direct endovascular therapy versus endovascular therapy bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). This study intends to include patients with AIS due to BAO fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: patients with AIS caused by BAO confirmed by CTA/MRA/DSA; IVT can be started within 4.5 hours after symptoms onset; Age ≥ 18 years old; NIHSS score ≥ 6. The main outcome is the 3-month mRS scale score. Secondary outcomes included NIHSS at 24 hours and 7 days after surgery, CTA vascular recanalization at 24-72 hours, mRS at 5-7 days, and infarct volume. The safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and the incidence of sICH.