View clinical trials related to Aortic Aneurysm.
Filter by:The team hypothesizes that fully automatic analysis of AAA could provide increased performance (decreased duration of segmentation with increased reproducibility and decreased inter and intraobserver variability) to detect aortic aneurysmal sac enlargement (volumes and diameters) and predict the risk of complications during the procedure and during follow-up (MAE, MACE, MALE, Stroke) compared to standard methods of measurement relying on approximate maximum sac diameter.
This study will evaluate the impact of complex thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in coagulation during the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing omplex thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about a new device, named the LIFE device, to treat people with aneurysms (swellings) in the aorta (large, main blood vessel that delivers blood from the heart to the body). The main questions this trial aims to answer are: - If the LIFE device works to treat aortic aneurysms - What medical problems participants have when the LIFE device is used Participants will undergo treatment with the LIFE device and thereafter at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years have their pulses checked, bloodwork to check kidney function (BUN and serum creatinine), and a CT scan of the aneurysm area.
The number of AAA-surgeries performed per capita is 3-4 times higher in Innlandet county, as compared to Oslo. The last three years the annual incidence of AAA requiring treatment has been 21.5 / 100 000 inhabitants in Innlandet, as compared to 6.6 / 100 000 in Oslo. The indication for surgery is the same in both regions. In Oslo, a screening program was established in 2011, reporting a prevalence of AAA of 2.6 %, but in Innlandet county all AAA are either symptomatic or incidental findings and the prevalence is unknown. The aetiology of the major difference in AAA prevalence between these two regions has not been previously explored.
Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) repair is offered when the risk of rupture exceeds the risk of surgery. Women (versus men) have a four-fold higher risk of AAA rupture but almost double the operative mortality. It is unknown whether the current 5.5cm diameter AAA repair threshold, derived from randomised trials including only 4% women, is applicable to women. Therefore, should women have their aneurysms repaired electively at smaller diameters than men to improve their AAA-related survival and quality of life? WARRIORS is an international randomised controlled trial of early elective endovascular repair versus routine surveillance in women (n=1112) with small asymptomatic AAA (4-5.4cm diameter), nested within a registry of non-participants. The surveillance group will be offered repair for rupture or upon reaching the 5.5cm threshold. Randomisation will be 1:1 stratified by country, age, and aneurysm diameter. The trial is powered for aneurysm-related mortality or rupture at 5 years. Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years is a major secondary outcome. Other outcomes include: operative mortality and complications, anxiety, major cardiovascular adverse events, and cost-effectiveness. Quality-of-life and anxiety questionnaires and "standard-of-care" using routine data will be collected. The trial aims to progress health equity through provision of evidence for sex-specific clinical guidelines for AAA repair.
Complex endovascular aortic repair in inflammatory and infective perivisceral abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (CEVARII) study is a collaborative international effort among vascular surgeons to establish a database on the global experience in the management of INAAs and IAAs. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) under protocol number 23-1533.
The goal of this interventional is to assess advantages of the ultrasound examination of the lungs in the early postoperative period in cardiac surgical patients after heart surgeries requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Evaluation of pulmonary complications and outcomes during mid-term follow-up, as well as comparison of ultrasound examination and traditional roentgenologic methods (X-ray examination and CT of the chest) will be performed. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Is ultrasound examination of the lungs a more specific and sensitive method in identification of early postoperative pulmonary complications after on-pump cardiac surgical procedures, in comparison with traditional X-ray methods. - Does early identification of interstitial pulmonary edema (based on number of visualised B-lines in the early postoperative period), influences mid-term outcomes in this cohort of patients Participants will undergo ultrasound examination of the lungs on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7 after heart surgery. Based on ultrasound findings and degree of interstitial pulmonary edema, medical (diuretics, anti-inflammatory, e.t.c) therapy will be modified. Researchers will compare this group of patients with control group, in which ultrasound examination will be performed in the same time frames, but no changes in medical management based on ultrasound findings will be made to see if timely administered medical therapy, based on ultrasound findings, can significantly improve symptoms, hospital lengths of stay and outcomes of this patients.
Given the expansion of indications for genetic testing and our understanding of conditions for which the results change medical management, it is imperative to consider novel ways to deliver care beyond the traditional genetic counseling visit, which are both amenable to large-scale implementation and sustainable. The investigators propose an entirely new approach for the implementation of genomic medicine, supported by the leadership of Penn Medicine, investigating the use of non-geneticist clinician and patient nudges in the delivery of genomic medicine through a pragmatic randomized clinical trial, addressing NHGRI priorities. Our application is highly conceptually and technically innovative, building upon expertise and infrastructure already in place. Innovative qualities of our proposal include: 1) Cutting edge EHR infrastructure already built to support genomic medicine (e.g., partnering with multiple commercial genetic testing laboratories for direct test ordering and results reporting in the EHR); 2) Automated EHR-based direct ordering or referring by specialist clinicians (i.e., use of replicable modules that enable specialist clinicians to order genetic testing through Epic Smartsets, including all needed components, such as populated gene lists, smartphrases, genetic testing, informational websites and acknowledgement e-forms for patient signature); 3) EHR algorithms for accurate patient identification (i.e., electronic phenotype algorithms to identify eligible patients, none of which currently have phenotype algorithms present in PheKB; 4) Behavioral economics-informed implementation science methods: This trial will be the first to evaluate implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics, directed at clinicians and/or patients, for increasing the use of genetic testing; further it will be the first study in this area to test two forms of defaults as a potential local adaptation to facilitate implementation (ordering vs. referring); and 5) Dissemination: In addition to standard dissemination modalities,PheKB95, GitHub and Epic Community Library, the investigators propose to disseminate via AnVIL (NHGRI's Genomic Data Science Analysis, Visualization, and Informatics Lab-Space). Our results will represent an entirely new paradigm for the provision of genomic medicine for patients in whom the results of genetic testing change medical management.
The goal of this registry is to evaluate the semibranch in branched endovascular arotic repair, which is a new tool in endovascular branched aortic repair.
It is currently unclear what activities aneurysms are involved in at the time of rupture. The aim of the study is to determine the activity performed at the time of aneurysm rupture.