View clinical trials related to Anxiety Disorders.
Filter by:This clinical trial evaluates Appa Health, a mental health smartphone and computer app for teenagers. Appa is built from two components. Component #1 shares short TikTok-style videos with teens to cover techniques from a science-backed mental health treatment, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. These videos are designed by mental health experts and delivered by mental health influencers. Component #2 pairs teens with peer mentors with similar life experiences, who help guide teens through each week's video content. All peer mentors are trained and supervised by licensed mental health experts. The researchers believe Appa Health improves teens' mental health and well-being through teens' strengthened relationships and support from their mentor, as well as through the skills they gain through watching the videos. This study hopes to understand: (1) whether these Appa Health components improve teens' mental health and well-being, (2) how these components might improve teen outcomes, and (3) costs associated with each of these components. To answer these questions, the researchers will compare two versions of Appa support: Appa Complete and Appa Lite. Appa Complete involves pairing teens with mentors and sharing videos. Appa Lite involves only sharing videos with teens. First, the researchers will conduct a small version of this study to test procedures. Seventy-five teenagers (13-18 years old) with high depression or anxiety scores will be randomly given either: Appa Complete (mentoring + videos), Appa Lite (videos only), or a Waiting List Control. Based on the results of this smaller study, the researchers will change study procedures to improve teens' experiences and engagement in this research. After completing this smaller study, the researchers will run a larger version of the same study with 400 more teens. After teens are randomly given Appa Complete, Appa Lite, or a Waiting List Control, the researchers will test whether Appa's two treatment components improve teens' depression, anxiety, well-being, and other related outcomes. The researchers expect both Appa Complete and Appa Lite will improve teens' outcomes more than the Waiting List Control. The researchers also expect Appa Complete will improve teens' outcomes more than Appa Lite. The researchers will also measure costs associated with giving teens both treatment components and use this information to improve Appa's services for future teens.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether an app- and mentor-based program reduced anxiety among individuals reporting difficulties with anxiety. For the intervention group, this study involved completing an 8-week program focused on helping participants reach their personality goals. The program involved app-based games, journaling, and completing behavioral challenges. Participants engaged with the study app for approximately 15 minutes per day and spoke with a study mentor weekly for 1 hour. Participants were asked to complete surveys prior to and after the program. The pre-program survey lasted approximately 1 hour, and the post-program survey lasted approximately 30 minutes. For the control group, this study involved completing surveys. Participants were asked to complete surveys 8 weeks apart. The first batch of surveys lasted approximately 1 hour, and the follow-up surveys lasted approximately 30 minutes.
Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a common condition that significantly affects patients' mental well-being, overall quality of life, and healthcare use. Even after ruling out cardiac issues, many patients still worry about having an undiagnosed cardiac illness, leading to cardiac anxiety since no other explanation is provided. Consequently, they avoid activities they believe might harm their heart, worsening their overall health and resulting in increased healthcare visits and societal costs. Addressing cardiac anxiety through psychological interventions could help break this viscious cycle and enhance patient outcomes. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) can assist patients in reassessing their perceptions, emotions and behaviours in order to handle their chest pain and therby reduce their cardiac anxiety. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of a guided 8-week iCBT program on cardiac anxiety, generalized anxiety, kinesiophobia, fear of body sensations, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, chest pain frequency and illness perception. Also to examine how participants' personality traits influence the effectiveness of the iCBT program. Furthermore, to assess the cost-effectiveness of the iCBT program compared to attention control. In addition, we will explore the perceptions of participants regarding the therapeutic alliance during the treatment.
The aim of the study is to test the pilot effectiveness of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in decreasing psychological distress and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and increasing well-being in earthquake survivors in Türkiye, using randomized controlled trial study design, which is considered the gold standard in research for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. This pilot study will help to identify any further adaptations required prior to further effectiveness testing in a large cluster randomized controlled trial. Study hypothesis: Hypothesis 1: The participants who receive the CPT will have a significantly higher decrease in PTSD symptoms compared to the participants in the care-as-usual control group at the post-assessment. Hypothesis 2: The participants who receive the CPT will have a significantly higher decrease in depressive symptom severity compared to the participants in the care-as-usual control group at the post-assessment. Hypothesis 4: The participants who receive the CPT will have a significantly higher decrease in anxiety severity compared to the participants in the care-as-usual control group at the post-assessment. Hypothesis 5: The participants who receive the CPT will have a significantly higher increase in well-being compared to the participants in the care-as-usual control group at post-assessment.
The goal of this quasi-experienmental study is to investigate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based intervention in the level of uncertainty and anxiety, and determintation towards hospital admission among pregnant women. The main questions : • Do pregnant women in intervention group reduce anxiety and uncertainty? • Do pregnant women in intervention group increase self-determintation ability towards hospital admission? Women in the intervention group participated 4 weeks mindfulness-based intervention online courses, Researchers have seen effectiveness of mindfulness-based intervention in the level of uncertainty, anxiety, and determintation towards hospital admission among pregnant women.
This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study of patients with generalized anxiety disorder, who will be randomly assigned to either drug-combined transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) group or drug-combined sham-stimulation group for a period of 4 weeks of treatment.Scale assessments will be performed at baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, and week 4 of treatment, and brain function monitoring as well as laboratory tests will be performed at baseline and at the end of treatment, respectively.The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of medication combined with tVNS and the possible mechanisms of tVNS in the treatment of anxiety.
The Efficacy of Lavender and Chamomile Essential Oils Inhalation in Management of Dental Anxiety in Children Undergoing Local Anesthesia Administration and Primary Tooth Extraction.
This study was evaluated anxiety, pain, and oral health-related quality of life in individuals treated with conventional fixed appliances (Group A) and clear aligners (Group B) for moderate malocclusion during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment
This study seeks to understand emotion regulation in those with anxiety using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback, a tool that allows individuals to control brain activity. The goal of this project is to understand how receiving feedback about one's own brain activity relates to emotion regulation ability. This work will help the study team understand the brain areas involved in emotion regulation and could lay the groundwork to test if psychotherapy outcomes can be enhanced using neurofeedback. The study hypothesis include: - Participants receiving veritable-Neurofeedback (NF) will show a greater activation increase in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) compared to sham-NF - Participants receiving veritable-NF will show greater cognitive reappraisal (CR) ability compared to those receiving sham-NF - Prefrontal cortex activation will positively correlate with CR ability - The veritable-NF group will report decreased symptom severity and increased CR use compared to the sham-NF group - Increase in NF-induced brain activation will correlate with decreased symptom severity and increased CR use at follow-up
The purpose of this study is to 1) examine the importance of self-reported relief following exposure and 2) test whether positive-focused rehearsal following exposure can improve treatment outcomes for participants who endorse fear of public speaking. Exposure therapy is an extinction-based behavioral technique, often employed in the context of cognitive behavioral therapy. It involves strategically exposing an individual to a feared stimulus in an effort to generate new non-fear associations with that stimulus. Relief refers to the positive, rewarding emotions associated with the absence of an expected aversive outcome following exposure to a feared stimulus. In the current study, participants will engage in a series of short public speaking exposures that take place over two sessions. After every two exposures, participants will be asked to complete either a positive or neutral rehearsal exercise, consisting of recalling either positive or neutral aspects of the speech exposures. At multiple points throughout the study, participants will complete ratings of reward sensitivity, positive affect, relief, and expectancy of the aversive outcome. The investigators will test the following: 1) the relationship of reward sensitivity and positive affect with relief following exposures, 2) the relationship between relief after exposure and learning rate (i.e., learning that the feared stimulus does not predict an aversive outcome), 3) potential differences in exposure outcomes between the positive and neutral rehearsal groups.