View clinical trials related to Aneurysm.
Filter by:Intracranial aneurysm (IA) is a cerebrovascular disorder in which the weakness of a cerebral artery wall causes a localized dilation of the blood vessel. Intracranial aneurysm can develop and rupture, and about 85% of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) cases are caused by the rupture of Intracerebral aneurysm. Two treatments are available globally: microsurgical clipping and endovascular treatment. Endovascular treatment of Intracerebral aneurysms using detachable platinum coils ( was introduced in 1990 by Guido Guglielmi, an Italian neurosurgeon ) of different shapes and sizes are deposited into the aneurysm through a microcatheter, which reduces the blood flow and induces thrombus formation . Wide neck aneurysm defined by neck diameter greater than 4 mm or dome-to-neck ratio less than 2 Despite advances in endovascular techniques , the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms remains problematic . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates and faster recovery compared with traditional microsurgical clipping. In wide-necked Intracerebral aneurysms, complete coil embolization is often technically difficult owing to the risks of distal coil migration or coil impingement on the parent vessel . Complete coil embolization using a single microcatheter without a supporting device in cases of wide-necked Intracerebral aneurysm is technically difficult. Total occlusion rates have increased recently as a result of the advancement of supporting devices These may include balloon remodeling, use of three-dimensional (3D) coils (Russian Doll Technique), combined use of stents and coils (Stent assisted coiling), flow diverters, use of intrasaccular flow disruption (like WEB), Double catheter Technique or combined extra- and intrasaccular devices.
This study aims to evaluate mid- and long-term outcomes after Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with custom-made devices.
The term mycotic aneurysm (MA) is commonly used to describe all infected aneurysms. Although MAs are believed to occur uncommonly, the true incidence is difficult to determine and is probably underestimated since MAs can be asymptomatic and are diagnosed only at autopsy. In an autoptic study, mycotic aortic aneurysms (MAAs) were reported in 3.3% of all detected aneurysms. The incidence of infected aneurysms of the aorta and iliac arteries ranges from 0.6% to 1.3%. A recent literature review of the management of MAAs showed that therapeutic strategies are multiple, including open surgical repair (OSR) in the majority of cases, endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), which increased over the last decade, and medical treatment alone for patients unfit for any aortic repair in a very limited part. Following the unfavorable prognosis towards rupture and since the medical treatment alone in mycotic aneurysms has shown mortality of almost 100%, surgical treatment is generally the preferred option. Surgical treatment includes both open and endovascular surgery. The latter is less invasive than conventional surgery but does not involve resection of the infected tissue and is therefore associated with an increased risk of sepsis and prosthesis infection. The gold standard is still open surgery, including extra-anatomic reconstruction and in situ repair, with different type of vascular graft. This is a multicenter retrospective observational study. It will examine all patients undergoing surgical treatment of mycotic aortic-iliac aneurysms and in situ reconstruction at the participating centers.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test augmented reality (AR) based neuronavigation system in surgeries for patients of brain neoplasm or cerebral vascular disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: • AR based neuronavigation system can achieve accuracy that is not inferior to conventional intraoperative navigation system. Participants will participate the study after informed consent. When participants undergo surgery for their brain tumor, we will set up 2 types of neuronavigation, conventional navigation system and developed AR based neuronavigation system. Surgeon will plan and conduct surgery based on only conventional navigation system, but 3D errors at several selected points between two types of navigation will be measured and analyzed.
The goal of this prospective observational cohort study is to compare health related quality of life in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated by either standard or complex EVAR (endovascular aneurysm repair) devices. The main question it aims to answer are: - Compare differences between the physical scores from the preoperative to the postoperative settings between patients treated with standard EVAR vs non-stnadard endovascular aortic repair (F-/BEVAR) - To compare long-term physical scores postoperatively between patients treated with standard EVAR vs non-standard endovascular aortic repair (F-/BEVAR) at one year. - To explore at which time points (if ever) patients treated with standard-EVAR and nonstandard endovascular aortic repair (F-/BEVAR) have restored or normalized physical scores measured by SF-12, measured at 30 days, 6 months, 1 and 3 years. Participants will be asked to fill out forms pre- and postoperatively with regards to health related quality of life. The different groups for comparison will be either standard EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysms or complex EVAR (fenestrated or branched) for paravisceral aortic aneurysms (PVAAA).
To assess safety and feasebility of the "safe-line" technique in a multicenter international collaboration.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Self-expanding Intracranial Stent (Tonbridge), by comparing the data obtained from Self-expanding Intracranial Stent (Zhuhai Tonbridge Medical Tech. Co., Ltd.) and LVIS/LVIS Jr. (MicroVention Europe SARL) for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
To explore the effect and prognosis of endovascular interventional therapy in high-risk patients with aortic arch dissection and aneurysm
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare intracranial aneurysm patients. The main question it aims to answer are: Which heparinization regimen is most beneficial to patients during surgery for intracranial aneurysms. Participants will be randomized to different intraoperative heparinization regimens: (i) 50 U/kg intravenous (IV) at 1-h intervals reduced by half to a minimum of 1000 u/h; (ii) 70 U/kg IV at 1-h intervals reduced by half to a minimum of 1000 u/h. MRI will be performed within 72 h after surgery, and the DWI sequence of MRI will be analyzed. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare different intraoperative heparinization protocol groups to see which dose of intraoperative heparin has the best prognosis for use.
Observational, prospective/retrospective, non-randomised, non-comparative, multicentre cohort study. Primary objective is evaluation of in-hospital all-cause mortality after treatment of extensive acute and chronic aortic pathologies with E-vita OPEN NEO.