View clinical trials related to Aneurysm.
Filter by:The objective of this registry is to find and validate a correlation between morphological indicators such as volume sac evolution, graft migration or length between anatomical landmarks with aneurysm rupture risk or complications such as endoleaks requiring re-intervention… Secondary objectives are the validation of the reproducibility and accuracy of a dedicated fully automated software enabling Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) segmentation to measure AAA diameter, volume evolution and growth over time, proximal and distal sealing zones analyze as well as device migration and integrity after EVAR on computed tomography angiography (CTA). This validation is in comparison with semi-automated analyse controlled by physician.
The objective of the registry is to evaluate the effectiveness and performance of the Solitaire Neurovascular Remodeling Device when used with embolic coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and initial clinical safety of eCLIPs device use for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. The eCLIPs device is a novel shield like implant that is placed across the neck of the aneurysm and not only facilitates coil retention but also partly obstructs the flow of blood into the aneurysm. This is an early feasibility study, which is a small study investigating an innovative device to gather more clinical data before conducting a larger study. The safety and the effects of the device on the aneurysm will be studied for 12 months after the procedure among 15 patients at approximately 4 participating hospital centers. A larger study will be required to determine the safety and efficacy of the eCLIPs device for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms.
Surgery for abdominal aortic pathology usually occurs in the setting of advanced cardiovascular disease. The repair can be relatively simple or complex with multiple steps including open repair, placing a stent with a catheter, and placing a complicated stent that allows for crossing vessels without occluding them. All these repairs require imaging follow up. The most commonly accepted tool for follow up is Computed Tomography (CT) scan which involves ionizing radiation and potentially nephrotoxic iodinated contrast. Recommendations for the time interval for follow up, as well the radiology imaging technique vary. Routine ultrasound with Doppler, CT, and MRI has all been employed utilizing various imaging protocols. Clinicians use non-contrast CT, arterial phase and delayed phase CT, ultrasound, and various combinations based on personal experience and patient pathology. Concerns over cost, potential nephrotoxicity of contrast agents and repeated radiation exposure has led to investigation of alternate imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). CEUS represents an improvement of ultrasound imaging but comparisons against CT report widely varying results, likely due to technical factors of CEUS and limitations of single-phase CTA. Contrast ultrasound has been used effectively to diagnose leaks in the aorta post repair and is without the radiation and potential nephrotoxicity of iodinated contrast. Of yet, no large prospective studies have compared CT and contrast US and no studies have looked at the more complicated staged or fenestrated repairs. This study proposes to perform a contrast ultrasound at the same time as a contrast CT using a standardized protocol. This protocol would include a non-contrast CT, angiographic CT, and a CT in a delayed phase in all patients as standard of care. We will compare the results of a contrast US with the various data derived from a three phase CT.
Cerus Endovascular is sponsoring a prospective, multi-center PMCF to document the safety and performance of the Contour Neurovascular System™ (hereinafter "Contour") in normal medical use.
Nurea wants to set-up a pivotal phase clinical study for its software PRAEVAorta, a decision-making support for diagnosis and follow-up of abdominal aorta aneurysm. This study is a comparative study. Its purpose is to demonstrate the adequacy of PRAEVAorta to the current Gold Standard in the care of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. The currently benchmark methods are the maximal diameter method (Hand-held measurement of maximum diameter on scan images) and the segmentation method for the aneurysm volume (manual segmentation of scan images, then calculation of the AAA volume by counting the pixels). The hypothesis is that 90% of the segmented patients have a volume ratio and a diameter ration equal to or greater than 90%.
Thoracic aneurysm incidence is estimated to 4.5 cases per 100 000. The manifestation as well as natural history of thoracic aneurysm depend on many factors such as its localisation, its diameter, presence of collagen disease and family history. For the ascendant aortic aneurysm, it is often linked to a degeneration of the media arterial layer of the arterial wall. The media degeneration is cause by the degeneration of the elastic fibres, which lead to a weakening of the arterial wall accompanied with dilation. This process is often due to age and is accelerated by high blood pressure. Amongst the numerous factors causing the aneurysm, the investigators find: hypertension, aortic bicuspid valve, smoking, atherosclerosis, trauma and genetic predisposition. The average growth rate of thoracic aneurysm is 0.1-0.2 cm/year. The risk of rupture is associated to the size of the aneurysm as well as patient's symptoms. The ruptures and dissections rates are accounted for 2-3/year for thoracic aneurysm between 5.5-6.0 cm in diameter. The patients are often limited in their daily life activities considering their concern and risk of rupture and/or dissect. The effects of exercise on the progression of the aneurysm dilation in patients with thoracic ascendant aortic aneurysm are unknown. It is well known that high blood pressure is a risk factor for rupture of the aortic aneurysm. Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of physical exercise regarding the lowering impact of blood pressure in a cardiac hypertensive population. At 3 and 6 months of the intervention, the subjects in the exercise group will have: 1) a lowered blood pressure at rest and during exercise, 2) maintenance/ improvement of muscle strength, 3) improvement of aerobic exercise capacity (VO2max), and 4) aortic dilation that remained stable or comparable to the control group. The research objective is to measure and compare to a control group, the effects of an exercise program on the following parameters: blood pressure response at rest and during exercise, as well as the VO2max at 3 and 6 months time of the intervention. This randomised and prospective study will take place at the " Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie du Québec (IUCPQ) " and will include patients who have a non-surgical ascendant thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA). The selected subjects will be randomised into two groups: 1) exercise group (n=15), and 2) control group (n=15). Both groups will be met prior to the intervention (baseline) and at 3 and 6 months time of the intervention, and measures described below will be recorded.
INITIATION is a postmarket clinical follow-up study in China. The purpose of the study is to continue to evaluate the safety and effectiveness/performance of Incraft in subjects with abdominal aortic aneurysms requiring endovascular repair in routine clinical practice. Approximately 120 subjects will be enrolled and followed through 1-years postprocedure. Up to 20 sites in China may participate.
The purpose of this study is to learn about protecting the brain from low blood flow (ischemia) with limb preconditioning. From human studies the investigators know that the brain can be protected from dangerous low blood flow by reducing the blood flow to an arm or leg for just a short period of time. This is called limb preconditioning. The investigators are studying the safety and feasibility of preconditioning and their effect of protecting the brain from ischemia in two different groups. This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, design. Up to 50 male and female patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of unruptured brain aneurysm who are randomized to the remote ischemic preconditioned or sham group will be enrolled. This study consists of one 3-9 month study period for each patient plus up to 14 days for enrollment activities. Subjects are required to return between 3-9 months for end-of-study procedures.
Retrospective data have shown that active sac management, as applied in EVAS, reduces the incidence of the post-implant syndrome. All-cause and cardiac mortality at one-year seems to be lower after EVAS when compared to EVAR. Ongoing, low grade, inflammation could differ between techniques and induce cardiac damage. This study is designed to establish whether EVAS results in a reduced post-operative inflammatory response during the first year after surgery, compared to EVAR as assessed by trends in circulating inflammatory cytokine concentration. Study design: International prospective, comparative, explorative study. Study population: Patients scheduled to undergo infra-renal EVAR with a polyester endograft or EVAS for an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. This is an explorative study and therefore only patients who would normally receive a suitable device as part of standard treatment at the participating institutes will be recruited. Blood samples will be taken at specified time points before and after surgery. Main study parameters/endpoints: The difference in early post-operative and long term inflammatory response between EVAS and EVAR, measured by the incidence of the post-implant syndrome. To investigate the incidence of the post-implant syndrome, the rise in CRP, WBC and circulating cytokines, at specified time points up to 12 months after surgery and the change in aortic thrombus volume and its relationship with the inflammatory response, measured by cytokines' concentrations.