Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06183567
Other study ID # UERH-AR-ZT-04
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 30, 2023
Est. completion date May 30, 2024

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Umraniye Education and Research Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The hypothesis of this study is that sedoanalgesia will provide better early neurological recovery than general anaesthesia in acute ischaemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy and to investigate the haemodynamic data of both anaesthetic methods.


Description:

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) is the standard emergency treatment for patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation due to urgent large vessel occlusion and suitable for interventional procedures. However, despite reperfusion of the ischemia-affected area, some patients do not recover clinically. The reason for this is not known exactly. It is known that age and baseline function, which are thought to indicate brain reserve, affect the long-term outcome of stroke. Chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and coronary artery disease, which are associated with low brain reserve, are quite common in acute ischemic stroke patients. There is controversy as to whether general anesthesia (GA) or sedoanalgesia (SA) should be used during EMT for acute ischemic stroke. There are not enough randomized trials addressing this question. Benefits of GA include airway preservation, pain control and potentially improved radiographic imaging and patient immobility for intervention. Conversely, GA is time-consuming and possibly associated with longer time for groin puncture and revascularization. In addition, hypotension may occur during GA, which carries a greater risk of ischemic damage. Advantages of SA may include shorter time to revascularization, fewer hemodynamic problems and the possibility of better neurological assessment during the procedure. The main arguments against SA are that patient movement can lead to procedural complications, higher radiation dose, the need for more contrast media and lack of airway control. Simonsen et al. compared general anesthesia and conscious sedation in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment (GOLIATH) and showed that the choice of different anesthesia method can affect infarct area growth, clinical outcomes, and important physiological and anesthetic parameters. Again, in the SIESTA (Sedation vs Intubation for Endovascular Stroke Treatment) study comparing sedation and intubation in endovascular stroke treatment, no significant difference was shown between both groups when early neurological recovery was compared (24th hour NIHSS). In this study, no superiority of conscious sedation over general anesthesia was demonstrated. In the ESCAPE and SWIFT study, general anesthesia and conscious sedation were compared and conscious sedation was associated with better outcome than general anesthesia.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 62
Est. completion date May 30, 2024
Est. primary completion date February 28, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of cerebral ischemic embolism within the first 6 hours 2. ASA 1-4 3. Body mass index below 30 kg m-2 4. NIHSS score = 10 5. Presence of isolated/combined occlusion at any level of the anterior circulation internal carotid or middle cerebral artery Exclusion Criteria: - Chronic renal failure - EF less than 40 - Presence of intracranial hemorrhage - Previous known history of severe neurological disease - Presence of bleeding diathesis - Pre-procedure GCS = 8 and intubated patients - Failure to clearly show the site of vascular occlusion on diagnostic imaging results - Clinical or imaging evidence of vascular occlusion that is not internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery - Absence of gag reflex, loss of airway protective reflex, inadequate saliva swallowing - History of lung infection, advanced COPD or respiratory failure - Known history of aspiration due to vomiting, - Known history of difficult airway - In the presence of known intolerance or allergy to certain drugs for sedation, analgesia or both - Previously known carotid artery stenosis - Pregnant patients - Patients without consent

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Sedoanalgesia
In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy, the procedure was performed under sedoanalgesia. The procedure was continued with mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and BIS monitoring.
general anesthesia
In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy, the procedure was performed under general anesthesia. The procedure was continued with mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and BIS monitoring.

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Umraniye Education and Research Hospital Istanbul Umraniye

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary scoring systems of neurological findings NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and FOUR (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness) scores Before Endovascular Thrombectomy and after 48 hours
Primary effects of both anesthesia management on hemodynamics during the procedure Mean arterial pressure, heart rate Before the Endovascular Thrombectomy procedure and until the end of the recovery period (4 hours)
Secondary early neurological outcome findings hemiparesis, hemiplegia, aphasia, facial paralysis 48 hours
Secondary mortality and morbidity exitus,discharge to home or palliative unit hospitalization days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04580030 - Tricuapid Annular Plane Sistolic Excursion Before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension After Induction
Active, not recruiting NCT04279054 - Decreased Neuraxial Morphine After Cesarean Delivery Early Phase 1
Completed NCT03640442 - Modified Ramped Position for Intubation of Obese Females. N/A
Recruiting NCT04099693 - A Prospective Randomized Study of General Anesthesia Versus Anesthetist Administered Sedation for ERCP
Terminated NCT02481999 - Pre- and Postoperative EEG-Monitoring for Children Aged From 0,5 to 8 Years
Completed NCT04235894 - An Observer Rating Scale of Facial Expression Can Predict Dreaming in Propofol Anesthesia
Recruiting NCT05525104 - The Effect of DSA on Recovery of Anaesthesia in Children (Het Effect Van DSA op Het Herstel na Anesthesie Bij Kinderen). N/A
Recruiting NCT05024084 - Desflurane and Sevoflurane Minimal Flow Anesthesia on Recovery and Anesthetic Depth Phase 4
Completed NCT04204785 - Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions N/A
Completed NCT03277872 - NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope N/A
Terminated NCT03940651 - Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Arthroplasty Surgery Phase 4
Terminated NCT02529696 - Measuring Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit Using Wireless Accelerometers
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Terminated NCT03704285 - Development of pk/pd Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
Recruiting NCT05259787 - EP Intravenous Anesthesia in Hysteroscopy Phase 4
Completed NCT02894996 - Does the Response to a Mini-fluid Challenge of 3ml/kg in 2 Minutes Predict Fluid Responsiveness for Pediatric Patient? N/A
Completed NCT05386082 - Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study
Terminated NCT03567928 - Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT06074471 - Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block N/A
Completed NCT04163848 - CARbon Impact of aNesthesic Gas