View clinical trials related to Anesthesia.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of supraphysiologic oxygen (hyperoxia) on myocardial function in anaesthetized patients undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery.
Objective: to compare the effect of alveolar recruitment manouver through stepwise increase and decrease in airway pressure or sustained 30 secondes 30 cmH2O continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac stroke volume estimated by oesophageal doppler in preload independent anesthetized patients scheduled for surgery.
Even decade ago it was believed that the choice method of anesthesia did not affect the course of the oncological process, but recent evidence has begun to emerge that inhalation anesthesia vs TIVA is associated with a higher number of adverse outcomes. Apparently, it makes sense to conduct mRCT in order to assess the effect of IA on immune system in patients operated on for breast cancer comprehensively. The results of that kind of RCT may finally give us an answer whether the choice of anesthesia affects the immune status of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The evaluation of complications and long-term survival will allow to recommend to use or not to use IA for this type of surgery. Objective: The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) is an anesthesia protocol that does not use morphine, and is increasingly used routinely. Indeed, this protocol would theoretically allow a better post-operative analgesic control, a lower incidence of post-operative complications (e.g. post-operative nausea and vomiting). In the end, it would also allow a better overall post-operative recovery and a decrease in the incidence of chronic post-operative pain. Nevertheless, the literature is poor on this issue and no randomized controlled study has evaluated the effect of the use of this type of anesthesia protocol on postoperative recovery.
Edmon (BBraun, Germany) is a portable, commercially available device for measurement of propofol in exhaled air. The study will aim at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of such exhaled propofol values compared with plasma propofol and measures of anaesthetic and antinociceptive effect.
The use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion in the perioperative period is associated with a reduction in postoperative pain scores, opioid use, incidence of nausea and vomiting, among other favorable outcomes. However, this therapeutic intervention has not yet been adequately evaluated by clinical trials when associated with regional anesthesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion during spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine alters the time to regression of sensory block in patients undergoing surgical procedures for the treatment of bone and connective tissue tumor surgeries. This will be a triple-blind randomized trial. The sample size estimated was 66 patients. The study will include all patients who meet the pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, choose to participate, and agree with the Informed Consent Form. The main anesthetic technique will be spinal anesthesia with 13 mg of isobaric bupivacaine. Patients will be allocated in two groups in a blindly after randomization: Group S (lidocaine 0.75mg.kg-1 in bolus followed by infusion of saline solution) and Group L (lidocaine 1.5 mg.kg-1 followed by continuous infusion of lidocaine solution at 2 mg.kg-1.h-1). The primary outcome will be the time to T12 regression of the sensory block. Will also be evaluated: time to regression of the motor block, most rostral dermatome achieved by the sensory block, time to two-segment regression oh the sensory block, propofol dose in the operating room, postoperative pain score at rest, pain at movement score, quality of recovery, use of opioids in the postoperative period, nausea or vomiting, dizziness, shivering, arrhythmias, hypotension, urinary retention, and length of stay. The records will be assigned to the RedCap database. The data will be extracted without identification of the allocation groups for the R software and the groups will be revealed to the researcher after the end of the statistical analysis to write the summary of the results. The results will be submitted to scientific journals afterward.
Recently, a lot of side effects have been identified from the perioperative use of opioids. To remedy this, anesthesia research has recently focused on providing safe general anesthesia without opioids in a new concept or anesthetic technic called Opiod Free Anesthesia (OFA). Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of OFA is scarce in Africa, with no report from Cameroon.The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of an adapted OFA protocol as well as its efficacy and safety in very painful surgeries like gynaecology surgery in a low-resource setting.
Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is now being adopted as a preferred technique for providing GA because of its various inherent advantages like reduced PONV incidence, improved quality of recovery post GA, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant action, anti-neoplastic activity, analgesic action, and absence of greenhouse effect. Over the years propofol-TIVA delivery has become more methodical due to the use of target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems. The current TCI technology has evolved with the introduction of the 'open' TCI concept wherein syringes of any configuration can be attached to the TCI-pumps having pre-programmed propofol PK-PD models. The two most commonly use propofol PK-PD models are the Marsh and Schneider models targeting the propofol blood plasma concentration and effect site concentration in the brain respectively. Automated delivery of propofol using computer-controlled closed loop anaesthesia device delivers propofol based on patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by bispectral index (BIS). Evaluation of anaesthesia delivery by these systems has shown that they deliver propofol and maintain depth of anaesthesia with far more precision as compared to manual administration. A recent advance in propofol delivery has been the development of automated closed loop anaesthesia delivery system. These devices deliver propofol based on patient's frontal cortex electrical activity as determined by bispectral index (BIS).Closed loop anaesthesia delivery system (CLADS) is an indigenously developed continuous automated intravenous infusion system which delivers propofol based on patients' EEG profile (BIS) feedback. Currently there is no data available comparing the efficacy of TCI delivered propofol versus automated propofol delivery systems. The investigators hypothesize that automated propofol delivery by CLADS will provide more consistent anaesthesia depth maintenance as compared to TCI delivered propofol. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the efficiency of CLADS-driven propofol TIVA versus TCI administered in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with respect to adequacy of anaesthesia depth maintenance, performance characteristic of propofol delivery system hemodynamic stability, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative sedation.
The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the number of physician top-up interventions during the first stage of labour between two different neuraxial analgesia techniques : the dural puncture epidural and the standard epidural.
Background: Somatosensory- (SSEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are commonly used as an intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring tool to detect aberrations to the spinal cord integrity during spinal surgery. Inhalational anaesthetic agents have a significant influence on evoked potentials by suppressing the amplitude and prolonging the latency. Evidences suggest that total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is superior to inhalation anaesthesia for neuromonitoring in spinal surgery, and support the use of up to 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anaesthetic agents in these procedures. Methods: Patients undergoing spinal surgeries will be prospectively recruited and be induced with TIVA at baseline of the evoked potentials. They will be randomized to receive balance anaesthesia with A) Desflurane MAC 0.5+remifentanil, or B) Desflurane MAC 0.75+remifentanil until the end of surgery. Influence of 1.0 MAC desflurane on the evoked potentials after the completion of surgery will also be studied. Desired Results: Endpoints include the changes to the amplitude and latency of SSEPs and MEPs with 0.5 and 0.75 MAC desflurane. The findings will indicate the safety of desflurane at the studied concentrations for spinal surgeries, and substantial savings with the use of desflurane instead of TIVA.