View clinical trials related to Anesthesia; Adverse Effect.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine which factors contribute to prolonged stay of children in the PACU.
Total intravenous general anesthesia and combined general anesthesia are recognized methods used during anesthesia. They allow you to effectively control pain and reduce the number of complications associated with taking large doses of opioid drugs. It should be emphasized that both methods of anesthesia are currently approved for use in routine anesthetic practice, and only the experience, knowledge and preferences of the anesthesiologist determine which technique will be used in a given patient. Both techniques are used in everyday anesthetic practice, but there is no conclusive scientific data confirming the superiority of either method in patients undergoing bariatric surgery, therefore currently only the individual experience, knowledge and preferences of the anesthesiologist determines which technique will be used in a given patient.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how postoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine would influence postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing lung surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are : 1. Does postoperative dexmedetomidine reduce the incidence of delirium after lung surgery? 2. Does postoperative dexmedetomidine introduce other medical problems? Researchers will compare dexmedetomidine and sufentanil to see if dexmedetomidine works to reduce delirium. Participants will undergo routine postoperative care: 1. Patient-controlled self anesthesia with sufentanil only or combination of sufentanil and dexmedetomidine 2. Postoperative visit twice a day for at least seven days
The aim of this study is to compare the impact of common (standard of care) language vs positive language used by clinicians during inhalational induction of anesthesia on anxiety and negative behaviors in children. This is a prospective randomized parallel group trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the common/standard language group or the positive language group.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare electroencephalogram (EEG) guided propofol sedation versus standard care in paediatric patients aged 6-16 undergoing oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are whether EEG guided propofol sedation will result in: - faster wake up time - reduced time to discharge - reduced cumulative propofol dosage - lower incidence of intraoperative adverse events - no difference in intraoperative undesirable movement - lower incidence and severity of emergence delirium - lower intraoperative depth of sedation Participants will wear an EEG sensor (Sedline) prior to undergoing propofol sedation until they wake up post procedure.
Intravenous anesthesia has been widely used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In the past decade, many practices have been carried out under the propofol-based monitored anesthesia care without endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing ERCP. Ciprofol is a newly developed intravenous anesthetic with a potency 4-5 times than that of propofol. Ciprofol seems a promising anesthetic agent for intravenous anesthesia but the evidence supported its application in ERCP is still limited.
More than half a million children have an anaesthetic each year in the UK. Though anaesthesia is usually thought to be safe and necessary to improve health, concerns remain the effects that the drugs used may have on brain development in children and the potential long-term consequences for health. The two techniques used to keep someone asleep during anaesthesia are either giving the appropriate drugs through a small plastic tube into a vein or introducing different drugs into the lungs in gas form. Gene expression is the process by which instructions in DNA are used to make products such as proteins. Anaesthetic drugs may change how a child's genes are expressedÍž a process called epigenetics. Studies have shown that different anaesthetic drugs can cause epigenetic changes in animals and affect the processing ability of their brains. This study will focus on children aged under 3 undergoing general anaesthesia for planned hypospadias surgery (a developmental condition where the look and function of the penis may not be completely normally). Participants will either receive their general anaesthetic in gas form or through directly into their veins - both techniques are commonly used. A small blood sample (between 1 and 2 teaspoons) will be collected at the start and end of the operation whilst under anaesthetic. Samples will be analysed to look for any changes in signals on DNA (epigenetic changes) and other markers. Further analysis may then look at other measures of gene expression and additional processes/markers that could be affected. There is relatively less medical research carried out in children and this work will show whether this type of study is possible in this age-group and provide information for future trials. It will help towards improving our understanding of the effects of anaesthesia ultimately help doctors and families make better informed decisions.
To assess mortality and morbidity associated to anesthesia interventions
Studying the hemodynamic effects of titrated subarachnoid anesthesia versus conventional single-shot subarachnoid anesthesia
The goal of this RCT is to demonstrate that, in neonatal anesthesia, the use of Lung Ultrasound (LUS) to guide choice of best Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (Peep) - the one that efficiently avoids lung atelectasis - leads to better gas exchange in the lung thus can lead to reduction of FiO2 applied to ventilatory setting in order to achieve same peripheral saturations of oxygen (SpO2). Specific aims of the study are: 1. to determine if LUS-guided PEEP choice in neonatal anesthesia, compared to standard PEEP choice, can lead to reduction of FiO2 applied to the ventilatory setting in order to maintain same SpO2s. 2. to determine if patients treated with LUS-guided PEEP will develop less postoperative pulmonary complications in the first 24 hours. 3. to compare static respiratory system compliance between groups. 4. to determine if there is a significant difference in hemodynamic parameters and amount of fluids infused or need for vasopressors between the two groups.