View clinical trials related to Anesthesia; Adverse Effect.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to compare the impact of common (standard of care) language vs positive language used by clinicians during inhalational induction of anesthesia on anxiety and negative behaviors in children. This is a prospective randomized parallel group trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the common/standard language group or the positive language group.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare electroencephalogram (EEG) guided propofol sedation versus standard care in paediatric patients aged 6-16 undergoing oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are whether EEG guided propofol sedation will result in: - faster wake up time - reduced time to discharge - reduced cumulative propofol dosage - lower incidence of intraoperative adverse events - no difference in intraoperative undesirable movement - lower incidence and severity of emergence delirium - lower intraoperative depth of sedation Participants will wear an EEG sensor (Sedline) prior to undergoing propofol sedation until they wake up post procedure.
Intravenous anesthesia has been widely used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In the past decade, many practices have been carried out under the propofol-based monitored anesthesia care without endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing ERCP. Ciprofol is a newly developed intravenous anesthetic with a potency 4-5 times than that of propofol. Ciprofol seems a promising anesthetic agent for intravenous anesthesia but the evidence supported its application in ERCP is still limited.
More than half a million children have an anaesthetic each year in the UK. Though anaesthesia is usually thought to be safe and necessary to improve health, concerns remain the effects that the drugs used may have on brain development in children and the potential long-term consequences for health. The two techniques used to keep someone asleep during anaesthesia are either giving the appropriate drugs through a small plastic tube into a vein or introducing different drugs into the lungs in gas form. Gene expression is the process by which instructions in DNA are used to make products such as proteins. Anaesthetic drugs may change how a child's genes are expressedÍž a process called epigenetics. Studies have shown that different anaesthetic drugs can cause epigenetic changes in animals and affect the processing ability of their brains. This study will focus on children aged under 3 undergoing general anaesthesia for planned hypospadias surgery (a developmental condition where the look and function of the penis may not be completely normally). Participants will either receive their general anaesthetic in gas form or through directly into their veins - both techniques are commonly used. A small blood sample (between 1 and 2 teaspoons) will be collected at the start and end of the operation whilst under anaesthetic. Samples will be analysed to look for any changes in signals on DNA (epigenetic changes) and other markers. Further analysis may then look at other measures of gene expression and additional processes/markers that could be affected. There is relatively less medical research carried out in children and this work will show whether this type of study is possible in this age-group and provide information for future trials. It will help towards improving our understanding of the effects of anaesthesia ultimately help doctors and families make better informed decisions.
To assess mortality and morbidity associated to anesthesia interventions
Studying the hemodynamic effects of titrated subarachnoid anesthesia versus conventional single-shot subarachnoid anesthesia
The goal of this RCT is to demonstrate that, in neonatal anesthesia, the use of Lung Ultrasound (LUS) to guide choice of best Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (Peep) - the one that efficiently avoids lung atelectasis - leads to better gas exchange in the lung thus can lead to reduction of FiO2 applied to ventilatory setting in order to achieve same peripheral saturations of oxygen (SpO2). Specific aims of the study are: 1. to determine if LUS-guided PEEP choice in neonatal anesthesia, compared to standard PEEP choice, can lead to reduction of FiO2 applied to the ventilatory setting in order to maintain same SpO2s. 2. to determine if patients treated with LUS-guided PEEP will develop less postoperative pulmonary complications in the first 24 hours. 3. to compare static respiratory system compliance between groups. 4. to determine if there is a significant difference in hemodynamic parameters and amount of fluids infused or need for vasopressors between the two groups.
We asked to a staff of digestive endoscopy and of the operating room to interpret the EEG traces obtained from a single dry electrode device to estimate the level of anesthesia during colonoscopy. They are required to produce a rank value (1 to 3) proportional to the anesthesia level. The rank values of anesthesia evaluated through the EEG traces will be correlated to the typically used "bispectral index" values simultaneously acquired. The expected efficacy of a low-cost single dry-electrode EEG would allow the monitoring of the level of anesthesia during non operating room procedures such as colonoscopy.
To assess if perioperative consumption of opioids can be optimized with the assistance of a Nociception Level (NOL) monitor in breast surgery patients receiving pectoral and parasternal nerve blocks as supplementation to general anaesthesia. Hypothesis: 1. NOL monitor guidance optimizes perioperative analgesic consumption and postoperative length of stay and offers a better quality of recovery in breast surgery. 2. Intraoperative NOL monitoring can detect the efficacy of pectoralis and parasternal nerve blocks. 3. Incidence of persistent neuropathic pain after breast cancer surgery is lower in patients receiving lower doses of perioperative opioids.
Epidural analgesia is established as the gold standard in the management of post-surgical pain in multiple modalities, including the pediatric patient. It is a technique that is not without risks, but with multiple benefits such as less response to stress, less incidence of chronic pain after surgery, less incidence of nausea and vomiting and other adverse effects derived from opioids, faster recovery and increased patient and family satisfaction. However, as it has been mentioned, the epidural carries risks both in the technique itself (wet or intravascular puncture) and subsequently after the injection of medication that generates a sympathetic blockade with arterial hypotension and an increase in compensatory heart rate. Unlike in adult patients, in pediatric patients epidural and subarachnoid anesthesia are better tolerated hemodynamically due to less vagal and sympathetic activity and almost no systemic venodilation. This lower activity of the autonomic nervous system is due to its immaturity, which is why, with the growth of the infant, this anesthetic technique increasingly affects its hemodynamics, being similar to the adult at the age of 8-12 years. The study hypothesis does not differ from that stated in physiology books and studies, but the investigators seek to identify the direct correlation of age with the different hemodynamic parameters available with current technology (cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, blood pressure ) in pediatric patients after epidural anesthesia. The study will be carried out in pediatric patients undergoing major surgery that requires the placement of an epidural catheter and invasive blood pressure, without modifying in any way the usual practice of the responsible anesthesiologist. The patient's hemodynamic data will be collected at time 0 (prior to catheter placement), one minute, 5 and 10 minutes after the bolus of local anesthetic administered to measure the child's hemodynamic response and relate it to their age and development. .