View clinical trials related to Anaphylaxis.
Filter by:Diagnostic accuracy and quality of management in anaphylactic shock is assessed in three conditions: expected, unexpected with no distractor, unexpected with distractor
Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal condition with a prevalence between 0.05 and 2% in the general population. This is therefore a frequent reason for emergency visits. Its diagnosis is mainly based on the NIAID / FAAN2 criteria, developed in 2006. The treatment of the condition consists of administration of intramuscular (or intravenous) epinephrine and the hemodynamic support of the patient, if necessary. Various other agents are frequently administered (class I and II antihistamines, corticosteroids) but their role is recognized to be less central than that of epinephrine. The relevance of corticosteroids in reducing the risk of rebound reaction is even questioned. After anaphylaxis, a serious phenomenon called a "biphasic reaction" can occur. This reaction is the return of symptoms of anaphylaxis resolution of the initial episode. The theoretical risk of a rebound reaction, or biphasic reaction, is conventionally described up to 72 hours after the initial anaphylactic event. Biphasic reaction is defined as a recurrence or occurrence of new signs or symptoms after resolution of the initial reaction, without re-exposure to the allergen. The potential occurrence of a biphasic reaction often warrants observation of patients for several hours in emergency departments following management of the initial anaphylaxis. Although recommendations and guidelines generally suggest observation times of four to six hours, there is no clear consensus or convincing evidence to guide this conduct. It sometimes even is suggested to observe patients for up to 24 hours. Problem: To date, there are no prognostic factors to identify a patient at greater risk who would benefit from such an observation. As these reactions are a relatively rare phenomenon (i.e. 4 to 5%, but which could go up to 20% according to some sources and the symptoms observed are usually less significant than during the initial presentation, it is therefore possible that a prolonged observation period may not be necessary for some patients who do not have high risk factors for biphasic reaction. In the current context of the growing number of people in emergency rooms and limited ressources, it seems essential to identify low risk patients in order to discharge them quicker and safely by limiting unnecessary observation periods. Objective: Identify and evaluate in a prospective manner previously derived (literature review and preliminary rules derivation already completed) clinical decision rules that are simple, generalizable and valid which could therefore become an interesting assets for the modern practice of emergency medicine as regards to post anaphylaxis rebound reaction risk stratification. It appears likely that some patients who have suffered an anaphylactic reaction could be safely discharged much earlier than in current practices. The rules would give clear guidelines to clinicians especially those working in lower flow settings, where clinical experience with the disease is less developed. Ultimately, these rules would also be relevant for teaching purposes for the various learners who do internships in emergency rooms.
A Study to Compare the Bioavailability of Epinephrine following a Single Nasal Dose of FMXIN002 Microspheres Powder with Epinephrine 0.3 mg Intramuscular Injection in Adult Subjects with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis with and without Nasal Allergen Challenge
The FARE Patient Registry will serve as a prospective, observational food allergy reporting system that stores detailed health and other basic information about patients' real-world experiences with food allergies, to encourage open sharing of de-identified data and participation in clinical trials. The FARE Patient Registry intends to make and support scientific discoveries by enabling the food allergy community to participate directly in research.
Research in acute care faces many challenges, including enrollment challenges, legal limitations in data sharing, limited funding, and lack of singular ownership of the domain of acute care. To overcome some of these challenges, the Center of Acute Care of the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands, has established a de novo data-, image- and biobank named "Acutelines". Acutelines is initiated to improve recognition and treatment of acute diseases and obtain insight in the consequences of acute diseases, including factors predicting its outcome. Thereby, Acutelines contributes to development of personalized treatment and improves prediction of patient outcomes after an acute admission.
Research on health literacy among caregivers of children with IgE-mediated allergy at risk of anaphylaxis (life-threatening allergic reaction). Health literacy is a person's ability to understand health information so that they can maintain or improve their health and quality of life (of themself and children). The aim of the study is to test the general knowledge of anaphylaxis. Furthermore we test the extent to which caregivers consider themselves able to recognize and to treat anaphylaxis.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the function and reliability of a non-invasive, skin-like electronic sensor. We hypothesize that this skin sensor will address an unmet need to wirelessly, noninvasively, and rapidly assess critical vital signs and other measures essential to healthcare monitoring for patients with asthma and anaphylaxis.
Anaphylaxis is a severe life-threatening reaction following exposure to an antigen. Its incidence is progressively increasing in the general population over years, accompanied with an increased number of hospitalizations. Although rare, this condition is often associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. The mortality rate has been recently estimated at 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88) per million per year in the French adult population. Age, chronic medication and cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities have been reported to increase the risk of a severe reaction. Obesity, age and cardiovascular comorbidities have been identified as risk factors for fatal anaphylaxis. However, the risk factors for death after ICU admission have not been elucidated yet.
There is an ongoing debate whether antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers and/or angiotensin converting Enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors comprises a risk factor for more severe and more frequent side-effects during venom immunotherapy (VIT). In the literature, data are controversial and originate from case reports or statistically underpowered studies; the number of included patients was usually high but the proportion of patients on antihypertensive treatment was low ranging from 2-11%. The study was conducted as a prospective, observational, European multicenter study. 1425 patients, aged from 35 to 85 years, with a history of an anaphylactic reaction due to bee or wasp stings, were included. The medical history was recorded as well as laboratory parameters and data of the VIT-updosing phase. One year after reaching the maintenance dose, possible side-effects during VIT as well as the outcome of field stings or sting challenges were documented.
To assess the drug exposure profile in systemic circulation of Primatene Mist by inhalation, versus Epinephrine by intramuscular injection, and ProAir HFA by inhalation in healthy adults.