View clinical trials related to Anaphylaxis.
Filter by:Anaphylaxis elicited by accidental intake of the offending food constitutes a major health risk to the food allergic patient. Current advice for the food allergic patient is to avoid the offending food allergen and to carry an epinephrine autoinjector. However, novel treatments altering the clinical reactivity to the offending food thereby diminishing the risk of anaphylaxis are much needed. A correlation between the level of specific IgE in serum towards the offending food and the clinical sensitivity of the patient has been suggested. The clinical threshold for a food allergic reaction to occur is therefore hypothesized to increase by reducing the level of specific IgE to the relevant food allergen. Therapy with Omalizumab has proven efficacious in lowering the level of IgE in serum but a high pre-treatment level of total IgE in serum potentially hampers the efficacy in a number of patients, as seen especially in patients with concomitant atopic dermatitis. The aim of this study is to investigate if the combination of initial IgE specific immunoadsorption combined with subsequent treatment with Omalizumab will increase the clinical threshold to the culprit food and thus prevent medical emergencies (anaphylaxis) in patients with severe food allergy.
Anaphylaxis is a hypersensitivity reaction systemic, generalized, severe, life-threatening that may result from exposure to a triggering factor. The prevalence of anaphylaxis is 0.05 to 2% in the general population. Most reactions appear within 30 minutes after contact with the triggering factor and last up to 6 hours. The main triggering factors are: 1/food, 2/hymenopteran bites, 3/drugs. The main treatment is the early administration of adrenaline by Intramuscular route on medical prescription or by AAI (adrenaline auto-injector) associated with the exclusion of the allergen. Adrenaline treatment should be administered as soon as possible, a failure or delay in the use of adrenaline is a risk factor for death. Anaphylaxis is a chronic disease and the patient must be informed from the first episode about the risk of recurrence and the risk of death he is exposed to. Patient education is essential for the complete removal of the triggering factor, recognition of anaphylaxis symptoms and use of AAI. The risk of recurrence is high given the difficulty to completely eliminate the favourable factor (mainly food causes and hymenopteran bites): 1/3 of deaths from food anaphylaxis occur at home, and the peak mortality rate is between 10 and 30 years old. The diagnosis of anaphylaxis can be difficult because the symptomatology can be so varied. It is under-diagnosed, which leads to a lack of medical care and therefore an under-prescription of AAI. Some American studies identifying emergency room visits for anaphylaxis find that in less than 30% of cases there is a prescription for AAI, in less than 40% of advices about triggering factor's eviction and in less than 20% a guidance to an allergology consultation. In France, the HAS published in 2013 a procedure to be followed after the treatment of a suspected anaphylaxis: the patient's management must be diagnostic, therapeutic and educational. It must be systematically based on three axes: - the prescription of AAI with an explanation of its use, - the provision of written information on the mechanism and symptoms of anaphylaxis, attitude to be followed in event of an anaphylactic reaction, and need for eviction if the allergen has been identified, - guidance to an allergology consultation. Therapeutic education for anaphylactic patients is essential given the risk involved. In an American study, it was shown that only 60% of teens and young adults suffering from food allergies report having AAI systematically with them. Information and education is therefore essential for these patients.
Anaphylaxis is an allergic reaction potentially fatal. The treatment is based on injection of epinephrin as soon as possible. Guidelines by the World Allergic Organisation highlight the importance of medical follow-up. This follow-up consists of an allergy consultation, the prescription and demonstration of epinephrin auto-injector and the implementation of specific measures in schools. There is no study about the recurrence of anaphylactic reaction outside the hospital. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the allergy follow-up of children after anaphylactic reaction. The secondary objective is to evaluate the use of medical advice in case of recurrence of anaphylactic reaction. Investigators will use a phone call questionnaire for parents of children who underwent an anaphylactic reaction between the 1st July 2014 and the 31st June 2016 treated in the Paediatric Emergency Department in Femme-Mère-Enfant Hospital in Lyon in France. 179 children could be included in the study.
Study clinical characteristics and phenotypes of patients diagnosed with NSAID sensitivity in Thailand
This registry aims to monitor the safety of Xueshuantong Injection and to identify the potential risk factors for the adverse drug reactions.
The purpose of this study is to establish the rationale for the practice of performing an oral reintroduction test without previous skin tests in children at low risk of IgE-mediated reaction or drug-induced toxidermia, and to confirm the criteria for a drug reintroduction test could be performed without previous skin tests, without subsequent risk of reaction for the child. The primary endpoint will be the risk of a severe IgE-mediated or delayed hypersensitivity reaction in children who received beta-lactam drug reintroduction protocol prior to skin testing.
Anaphylaxis is an acute serious allergic reaction, with multi-organ system manifestations caused by the release of chemical mediators and it is potentially fatal . Between 5% and 14% of patients may experience a recurrence of anaphylaxis 8-12 hours after the initial presentation, called biphasic (late-phase) . The mainstay of treatment for children experiencing anaphylaxis remains adrenaline and H1-antihistamines. Corticosteroids are not life-saving and do not have an immediate effect on the symptoms of anaphylaxis but may help reduce or prevent a biphasic "late phase" reaction . The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral glucocorticoids in prevention of the second phase or biphasic reaction of anaphylaxis, as compared to placebo in children, presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PEC Al-Sadd) with mild to moderate anaphylaxis (Prospective Study). Patients will be randomized to either one of the two treatment: Treatment 1: Dexamethasone 0.6mg/kg oral. Treatment 2 : Placebo All patients will be urgently treated for anaphylaxis according to guideline protocol. Enrolled patients will be given one of the study medications orally, and he /she will observe in the observation room with cardiac monitor and close monitoring by nurse. The treating physician will discharge patient when he/she looks well, breathing comfortably, has oxygen saturation >94%, stable blood pressure and no gastrointestinal or neurological manifestation. Discharge patients will be sent home on anti-histamine (cetirizine) for 5days. All patients will be followed up for one week post discharge by a phone call asking about the general condition, relapse of symptoms, or need for readmission.
- To study Major allergen in Wheat anaphylaxis in Thai population - To study and compare demographic data between group of wheat anaphylaxis
Activation of mast cells in the immune system is known to cause allergic reactions sometimes with severe systemic symptoms. The investigators have recently developed a blood-based mast cell activation diagnostic test in which levels of functional activation in-vitro in primary cultured mast cells generated from the peripheral blood of single individuals can be assessed. It is the hypothesis that the test can be used to predict the potential state of in-vivo mast cell activation in any individual based on the functional activation profiles exhibited by their cultured mast cells. The investigators now wish to translate their in-vitro findings in a pilot study to disease groups where mast cell activation is expected to be high. These include highly allergic individuals; those with chronic idiopathic urticaria; those with mastocytosis; and those with the mast cell activation syndrome. Furthermore, they will use the functional genomics approach to identify gene expression biomarkers that are correlated with such diseases. The results will be compared with data that have been collected from a cohort of healthy control blood donors.
Perioperative anaphylaxis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Most textbooks describe it as a rare event of the order of 1 in 10 to 1 in 20,000 general anaesthetic cases. However, a recent study in the United Kingdom suggested that 1 in 350 cases have features suspicious of perioperative anaphylaxis. This study suggests that perioperative anaphylaxis may be under recognised and under reported. When perioperative anaphylaxis is recognised, it would be ideal to carry out investigations firstly to confirm the diagnosis of anaphylaxis and secondly to identify the causative agent. The latter can be difficult in the context of anaesthesia where the patient is exposed to several drugs and other reagents in a short space of time. One of the interesting aspects of perioperative anaphylaxis is that there is variability in its epidemiology between different countries, for example between the United Kingdom, France, Scandinavia and Australia and New Zealand. There are currently no data from Egypt to include in such comparisons and to inform clinical practice. As well as being at risk if a drug allergen is not identified, patients can also be at risk from an incorrect allergy label. The most common example of this is penicillin allergy where fewer than 10% of patients with a history of penicillin allergy are found to be allergic. Incorrect penicillin allergy labels are potentially harmful for patients attending for surgery because the label independently increases the risk of developing infection to resistant organisms, longer hospital stays and mortality.