Clinical Trials Logo

Airway clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Airway.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06245668 Recruiting - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

SaCoVLM™ Video Laryngeal Mask Versus LMA Supreme

Start date: April 1, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Our study aimed to compare two different laryngeal masks, SaCoVLM™ Video Laryngeal Mask and blind placement with LMA Supreme, in adult patients undergoing short elective surgeries. The aim is to optimize the use of commonly used laryngeal masks in clinical practice and examine the differences in oropharyngeal leak pressures.

NCT ID: NCT04385576 Recruiting - COVID-19 Clinical Trials

Taiwan "Aerosol Box" Versus UMMC "Intubation Box"

Start date: May 15, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study compares two intubation boxes, that is the Taiwan "Aerosol Box" versus the UMMC "Intubation Box". The importance of this intubation box has come to light recently in view of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fact that intubation is an aerosol-generating procedure. Risks of the healthcare worker attending to the airway of COVID-19 patients is high and the intubation box aims to minimize that and reduce contamination of the environment. The original design of the "Aerosol Box" has limitations and is not easily used by intubators. This study evaluates the clinical usefulness of an innovation of the "Aerosol Box" design that is made to be more ergonomic and increases the rate of successful intubation. Anaesthetists with more than 5 years of clinical experience in intubating airways as well as more than 20 successful intubations using videolaryngoscopy , will be available to participate. This study will employ manikin and will be a randomized cross-over trial, conducted in UM.

NCT ID: NCT02210338 Recruiting - Intubation Clinical Trials

A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope

Start date: August 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study aims to determine the better device to facilitate intubation in patients with a limited neck movement and small mouth opening. This may help anesthesiology as well as emergency medicine practitioners and departments to decide when choosing between these two conceptually similar device. The hypothesis to be tested is that the C-MAC® is more superior when compared to the Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope in success of intubation, time to intubation and complication rate in patients with a fixed cervical collar.