Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05678985
Other study ID # H20-00780
Secondary ID PJT-169159
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 17, 2020
Est. completion date January 2025

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source University of British Columbia
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objectives of this study are to: 1) evaluate whether Choose to Move (CTM) Phase 4 improves health outcomes in older adults who participate and 2) assess whether CTM Phase 4 is delivered as planned and what factors support or inhibit its delivery at scale. CTM Phase 4 is a 3-month, choice-based program for low active older adults being scaled-up across British Columbia (BC), Canada. The goals of CTM are to enhance physical activity, mobility and social connectedness in older adults living in BC, Canada.


Description:

Choose to Move (CTM) Phase 4 is a 3-month, choice-based program for low active older adults being scaled-up in phases across British Columbia (BC), Canada. Within CTM (Phase 4), trained activity coaches support older adults in two ways. First, in a one-on-one consultation, activity coaches help participants to set goals and create action plans for physical activity tailored to each person's interests and abilities. Older adults can choose to participate in individual or group-based activities. Second, activity coaches facilitate 8 group meetings with small groups of participants. Activity coaches and recreation departments across BC are trained and provided with resources to deliver CTM. Objectives: 1. To assess the impact (effectiveness) of CTM (Phase 4) delivered at scale on the physical activity, mobility, and social connectedness of older adults (Part I - Impact Evaluation) 2. To assess whether CTM (Phase 4) was implemented as planned (fidelity) and investigate factors that support or inhibit its implementation at scale (Part II - Implementation Evaluation). Study Design: The investigators use a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation (Curran et al 2012) pre-post study design to evaluate CTM. The investigators use multiple methods (quantitative and qualitative) and collect data at 0 (baseline), 3 (post-intervention), 6 (3 months post-intervention), 15 (12 months post-intervention) and 27 (24 months post-intervention) months to assess impact and implementation of CTM.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 1000
Est. completion date January 2025
Est. primary completion date January 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 60 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria (older adults): - =60 years of age - demonstrate readiness for physical activity via the PAR-Q+ questionnaire, Get Active Questionnaire, or a letter of recommendation from their physician - <150 min/week physical activity - English speaking - Able to connect to the Zoom or GoToMeeting platform via phone or internet in order to participate in virtual group meetings (for online programs only) Exclusion Criteria (older adults): - Previous participation in CTM Inclusion Criteria (delivery partners): - Activity coaches will be English speaking, British Columbia Recreation and Parks Association (BCRPA) registered older adult fitness leaders or kinesiologists who are delivering CTM at participating centres - Recreation Managers and Coordinators affiliated with participating centres delivering CTM - Provincial Partners (e.g., individuals/partners who make strategic and/or policy decisions) at partner organizations delivering Choose to Move Activity Coach inclusion criteria: - Able to connect to the Zoom or GoToMeeting platform via internet (video and audio required in order to see and hear participants) for online programs - Able to connect to the Zoom or GoToMeeting platform via phone or internet in order to participate in virtual group meetings (for online programs only) - Currently (or recently completed) participating in CTM evaluation

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
Choose to Move
As described under study arm description.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Robert H.N. Ho Research Centre, University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of British Columbia Active Aging Society, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (14)

Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. — View Citation

EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. — View Citation

Holt, D.T., Armenakis, A.A., Feild, H.S., & Harris, S.G. Readiness for Organizational Change: the systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2007; 43(2): 232-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295

Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574. — View Citation

Lau, E. Y., Wandersman, A.H., & Pate, R. R. Factors Influencing Implementation of Youth Physical Activity Interventions: An Expert Perspective. Translational Journal of the ACSM: July 1, 2016 - Volume 1 - Issue 7 - p 60-70 doi: 10.1249/TJX.0000000000000006

Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, Iliffe S, von Renteln Kruse W, Beck JC, Stuck AE. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):503-13. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.4.503. — View Citation

Marshall AL, Miller YD, Burton NW, Brown WJ. Measuring total and domain-specific sitting: a study of reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jun;42(6):1094-102. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c5ec18. — View Citation

Milton K, Bull FC, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):203-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395. Epub 2010 May 19. — View Citation

Rejeski WJ, Rushing J, Guralnik JM, Ip EH, King AC, Manini TM, Marsh AP, McDermott MM, Fielding RA, Newman AB, Tudor-Locke C, Gill TM; LIFE Study Group. The MAT-sf: identifying risk for major mobility disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 May;70(5):641-6. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv003. Epub 2015 Feb 13. — View Citation

Simonsick EM, Newman AB, Visser M, Goodpaster B, Kritchevsky SB, Rubin S, Nevitt MC, Harris TB; Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Mobility limitation in self-described well-functioning older adults: importance of endurance walk testing. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Aug;63(8):841-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.8.841. — View Citation

Vancouver Coastal Health, Fraser Health, University of British Columbia. My Health My Community Survey. 2014. https://myhealthmycommunity.org/

Veroff, J., Kulka, R. A., & Douvan, E. A. M. (1981). Mental health in America: patterns of help-seeking from, 1957 to 1976: patterns of help-seeking from 1957 to 1976. Basic Books.

Warburton, D. E., Jamnik, V. K., Bredin, S. S., & Gledhill, N. (2011). The physical activity readiness questionnaire for everyone (PAR-Q+) and electronic physical activity readiness medical examination (ePARmed-X+). The Health & Fitness Journal of Canada, 4(2), 3-17.

Ware, J. E. (1989). SF-36 health status questionnaire. Boston, MA: Institute for the Improvement of Medical Care and Health, New England Medical Center Hospital, Quality Quest Inc.

* Note: There are 14 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Reach-individual The number of participants engaged in the intervention will be obtained from program records. 3-months
Other Reach-organizational The number of organizations and activity coaches delivering the intervention will be obtained from program records. 3-months
Other Dose delivered The amount of intervention delivered will be assessed via survey (designed in house). Lower scores indicate that a lower dose of the intervention was delivered than planned. 3-months
Other Fidelity (survey) Fidelity to planned delivery will be assessed via survey (designed in house). Higher scores indicate better adherence to planned delivery. 3-months
Other Fidelity (interview/focus group) Fidelity to planned delivery will be assessed via interview/focus group. 3-months
Other Participant responsiveness (survey) Program satisfaction will be assessed via participant survey (designed in house). Higher scores indicate higher participant satisfaction with the intervention. 3-months
Other Participant responsiveness (interview) Program satisfaction will be assessed via interview. 3-months
Other Adaptation (survey) Adaptation of the intervention and its delivery will be assessed via survey (designed in house). 3-months
Other Adaptation (interview/focus group) Adaptation of the intervention and its delivery will be assessed via interview/focus groups. 3-months
Other Contextual factors influencing implementation (survey) Contextual factors influencing implementation (community level factors, provider characteristics, characteristics of the innovation, the prevention delivery system, organizational capacity and the prevention support system) will be assessed via survey (designed in house). 3-months
Other Contextual factors influencing implementation (interview/focus group) Contextual factors influencing implementation (community level factors, provider characteristics, characteristics of the innovation, the prevention delivery system, organizational capacity and the prevention support system) will be assessed via interviews/focus groups. 3-months
Other Cost Program delivery costs will be recorded using a cost capture template. 3-months
Other Change in Organizational Readiness (Organizational Readiness Rubric) Organizational readiness (OR) will be assessed via survey (Organizational Readiness Rubric; ORR). The ORR comprises 14 items, each scored from 1-5. Higher mean scores indicate greater organizational readiness. 0, 3-months
Other Change in Organizational Readiness (Readiness for Organizational Change Scale) Organizational readiness (OR) will be assessed via survey (Readiness for Organizational Change Scale; ROCS). ROCS includes 25 items, each scored on a 5-point scale (1= strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Higher mean scores indicate greater organizational readiness for change. 0, 3-months
Other Organizational Readiness (OR) (interview/focus group) Organizational readiness (OR) will be assessed via interview. 0, 3-months
Primary Change in physical activity The single item physical activity questionnaire will be used to measure physical activity. Output variable is self-reported number of days/week =30 min physical activity in the past week (range 0-7). 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in capacity for mobility Two items will assess participants' ability to walk a quarter of a mile and up 10 steps. The output variable is self-reported presence of mobility-disability (no/any difficulty walking 400m or climbing one flight of stairs). 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in physical functioning The Physical Functioning Subscale of the SF-36 will be used to assess the physical function aspect of mobility. The measure asks participants to rate if their health limits them in performing 10 different activities. The output variable is an average score (range 0-100) of physical functioning, where a higher score indicates a more favourable health state. 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in mobility The Mobility Assessment Tool-Short Form (MAT-sf) will be used to assess mobility. MAT-sf is a validated, short form video-animated tool to assess participant self-perception of mobility. Only participants with an internet connection are able to complete this measure. The output variable is a self-perception of mobility score (range 23.45-67.61) where a higher score indicates greater perceived mobility. 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in loneliness The three-item loneliness scale will be used to assess loneliness. Participants rate three aspects of loneliness. The output variable is loneliness score (range 3-9); lower scores indicate lower levels of loneliness. 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in social isolation A three-item questionnaire adapted from two questions on social contact frequency will be used to assess social isolation. The output variable is social isolation score (range 0-15); higher scores indicate lower levels of social isolation. 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in social network A six-item questionnaire will be used to assess social network. The output variable is an equally weighted sum (range 0-30) where higher scores indicate more social engagement. 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in social connectedness A single item will be used to assess sense of belonging as an indicator of social connectedness. The output variable is sense of belonging score (range 1-4) where lower scores indicate a stronger sense of belonging. 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in sitting time A five-item questionnaire will be used to assess change in sitting time (hours and minutes) each day in the following domains: (a) while travelling to and from places (e.g., work, shops); (b) while at work; (c) while watching television; (d) while using a computer at home; and (e) at leisure not including watching television (e.g., visiting friends, movies, eating out) on a weekday and a weekend day. The output variables are sitting hours per day across 5 domains. 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in screen time A single item will be used to assess screen time. The output variable is hours of screen time per day. 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L Profile) Health status will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L. Participants report on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression on a scale from 1-5 (level of perceived problems) for each item. Responses are used to create a 5-digit number which will be used descriptively (11111 indicates no problems on any of the five dimensions whereas 55555 indicates extreme problems on all five dimensions). 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L Level Sum Score) Health status (EQ-5D-5L Level Sum Score) will be assessed with the EQ-5D-5L. Participants report on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression on a scale from 1-5 (level of perceived problems) for each item. The Level Sum Score uses the 5-digit profile to create a numeric score, with scores ranging from 5-25 (lower levels indicate lower levels of perceived problems). 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
Secondary Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale) Health status will be assessed with the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale. Participants report on their health on a visual analogue scale from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health). 0, 3, 6, 15, 27-months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05433233 - Effects of Lifestyle Walking on Blood Pressure in Older Adults With Hypertension N/A
Recruiting NCT06032065 - Sequential Multiple Assessment Randomized Trial of Exercise for PAD: SMART Exercise for PAD (SMART PAD) Phase 3
Completed NCT05293730 - Trial of the Impact of the Electronic Frailty Integrated With Social Needs N/A
Recruiting NCT03932162 - Gene Expression Changes In Young and Geriatric Skin Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04064528 - Effects of Age on Amino Acid Delivery to Tendon N/A
Completed NCT03366129 - Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in People With White Matter Hyperintensities Who Have Had a Stroke
Completed NCT06029920 - Influence of Overground Walking on Biomarkers, Cognitive Function, and Quality of Life in Elderly With Mild Cognitive Impairment N/A
Recruiting NCT05543980 - Leg Heat Therapy in Elderly Individuals Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05566938 - Study to Design a Precision Nutrition Strategy at a Group Level in the Elderly N/A
Completed NCT04894929 - Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Monitoring of Functional Improvement N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06071130 - Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04641663 - Multi-target Dietary Supplement Tolerability in an Aging Population (MTDSST) N/A
Completed NCT04088006 - The Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Injection on Skin Moisturization and Elasticity N/A
Completed NCT03695081 - Patient Pathway Pharmacist - Optimal Drug-related Care N/A
Recruiting NCT05424263 - Acetate and Age-associated Arterial Dysfunction Phase 2
Completed NCT05601713 - Mitigating Heat-induced Physiological Strain and Discomfort in Older Adults Via Lower Limb Immersion and Neck Cooling N/A
Completed NCT04551339 - Zinc Versus Multivitamin Micronutrient Supplementation in the Setting of COVID-19 N/A
Recruiting NCT04997577 - Speech Perception and High Cognitive Demand N/A
Completed NCT05922475 - Efficacy of Pre-sleep or Post-exercise Protein During 12 Weeks of Resistance Exercise Training N/A
Completed NCT04015479 - Peanut Protein Supplementation to Augment Muscle Growth and Improve Markers of Muscle Quality and Health in Older Adults N/A